All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: hugh@veritas.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, npiggin@suse.de, riel@redhat.com,
	mztabzr@0pointer.de, mpm@selenic.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: MADV_WILLNEED implementation for anonymous memory
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 01:47:02 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080131014702.705f1040.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1201772118.28547.254.camel@lappy>

On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:35:18 +0100 Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:

> 
> On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 01:12 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> > Implementation-wise: make_pages_present() _can_ be converted to do this. 
> > But it's a lot of patching, and the result will be a cleaner, faster and
> > smaller core MM.  Whereas your approach is easy, but adds more code and
> > leaves the old stuff slow-and-dirty.
> > 
> > Guess which approach is preferred? ;)
> 
> Ok, I'll look at using make_pages_present().

Am still curious to know what inspired this change.  What are the use
cases?  Performance testing results, etc?

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: hugh@veritas.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, npiggin@suse.de, riel@redhat.com,
	mztabzr@0pointer.de, mpm@selenic.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: MADV_WILLNEED implementation for anonymous memory
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 01:47:02 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080131014702.705f1040.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1201772118.28547.254.camel@lappy>

On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:35:18 +0100 Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:

> 
> On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 01:12 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> > Implementation-wise: make_pages_present() _can_ be converted to do this. 
> > But it's a lot of patching, and the result will be a cleaner, faster and
> > smaller core MM.  Whereas your approach is easy, but adds more code and
> > leaves the old stuff slow-and-dirty.
> > 
> > Guess which approach is preferred? ;)
> 
> Ok, I'll look at using make_pages_present().

Am still curious to know what inspired this change.  What are the use
cases?  Performance testing results, etc?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-31  9:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-30 17:28 [PATCH] mm: MADV_WILLNEED implementation for anonymous memory Peter Zijlstra
2008-01-30 17:28 ` [PATCH] mm: MADV_WILLNEED implementation for anonymous memory, " Peter Zijlstra
2008-01-30 18:15 ` [PATCH] " Matt Mackall
2008-01-30 18:15   ` Matt Mackall
2008-01-30 22:40 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-30 22:40   ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-31  8:44   ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-01-31  8:44     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-01-31  9:12     ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-31  9:12       ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-31  9:35       ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-01-31  9:35         ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-01-31  9:47         ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-01-31  9:47           ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-31  9:53           ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-01-31  9:53             ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-01-31 10:05             ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-31 10:05               ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-31 10:10               ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-01-31 10:10                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-01-31 10:18                 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-31 10:18                   ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-31 10:15             ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-31 10:15               ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-31 10:19               ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-31 10:19                 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-31 11:06                 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-31 11:06                   ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-31 10:52                   ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-31 10:52                     ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-31 11:32                     ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-31 11:32                       ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-31 11:09                       ` Rik van Riel
2008-01-31 11:09                         ` Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080131014702.705f1040.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=mztabzr@0pointer.de \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.