Re: [git pull] Input updates for 2.6.25-rc0

[Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@insightbb.com>]

On Wednesday 06 February 2008 01:32, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> Looks OK.  Minorish things from a quick scan:
> 
> 
> 
> tosakbd_scankeyboard() looks like it'll spend a perfectly wicked amount of
> time under spin_lock_irqsave().
>

I think you are right. I will check with Dmitry if it can be relaxed a bit.
 
> 
> 
> This code, in tosakbd_probe():
> 
> +fail2:
> +	while (--i >= 0)
> +		gpio_free(TOSA_GPIO_KEY_STROBE(i));
> +
> +	i = TOSA_KEY_SENSE_NUM;
> +fail:
> +	while (--i >= 0) {
> +		free_irq(gpio_to_irq(TOSA_GPIO_KEY_SENSE(i)), pdev);
> +		gpio_free(TOSA_GPIO_KEY_SENSE(i));
> +	}
> 
> looks like it'll free irqs and gpios which were never allocated (if i <
> TOSA_KEY_SENSE_NUM on entry).
>

Umm? There are 2 groups of gpios (sense and strobe) with sense group
registered first. Looks ok to me.
 
> 
> 
> +static int __devinit tosakbd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) {
> 
> please integrate checkpatch into your merging process.
>

Will do.
 
> 
> 
> 
> i8042_platform_init():
> 
> +#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
> 
> use #ifdef CONFIG_X86?
> 

I considered it but above was tested and in line with the style of the
rest of the file...
 
-- 
Dmitry