Re: multiboot2 vs. grub2 implementation

[Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>]

On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 05:23:44PM -0800, walt wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 14:23 -0600, jakllsch@kollasch.net wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 09:11:23AM -0800, walt wrote:
> > > jakllsch@kollasch.net wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> In the course of actually trying to use the MultibootDraft, I've 
> > >> discovered
> > >> some places where the draft and the grub2 implementation differ...
> > >
> > > Hi Jonathan,
> > >
> > > Are you using grub2/cvs with or without Bean's latest multiboot patch?
> > 
> > I tend not to be aware of these things.  I'm using stock sources.
> > 
> > > It still hasn't been committed, and I was about to ask about it anyway.
> > > Without that patch, multiboot doesn't work.
> > 
> > Hmm.
> 
> Agreed :o)  Bean's patch had some whitespace corruption anyway, so here
> it is again, diffed against today's latest cvs grub2:

If you just fixed whitespace, it is better if we just use patch -l or Bean
fixes it.  Otherwise it means more paperwork and legal stuff :-/

Bean, where you going to commit that patch?

-- 
Robert Millan

<GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
<DRM> What use is a phone call… if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)