From: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
To: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>,
jeff@garzik.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: NEWEMAC: Remove "rgmii-interface" from rgmii matching table
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 10:35:54 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080206163554.GA18575@lixom.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080206102340.1cdf7f8d@zod.rchland.ibm.com>
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 10:23:40AM -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 10:01:57 -0600
> Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 01:21:59PM +0100, Stefan Roese wrote:
> > > With the removal the the "rgmii-interface" device_type property from the
> > > dts files, the newemac driver needs an update to only rely on compatible
> > > property.
> >
> > What about systems using an older dts, such as one kexec:ing from an
> > older kernel?
>
> Like what? Kexec doesn't work on 4xx yet.
Sure, but similar restrictions would apply for customers who have a
flashed device tree that want to boot a newer kernel. Deprecating old
device tree support is something that should be done very carefully.
> > Just because the device tree source is distributed in the kernel tree
> > doesn't mean it can give up backwards compatibility.
>
> We checked Axon, which is the only non-DTS machine that uses EMAC and
> it will work fine with this change.
Ah, ok. I remember discussions about this patch before then, sounds like
it's safe. I just triggered on the dts-centric patch description.
Objections withdrawn. :)
-Olof
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
To: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com>
Cc: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, jeff@garzik.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: NEWEMAC: Remove "rgmii-interface" from rgmii matching table
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 10:35:54 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080206163554.GA18575@lixom.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080206102340.1cdf7f8d@zod.rchland.ibm.com>
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 10:23:40AM -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 10:01:57 -0600
> Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 01:21:59PM +0100, Stefan Roese wrote:
> > > With the removal the the "rgmii-interface" device_type property from the
> > > dts files, the newemac driver needs an update to only rely on compatible
> > > property.
> >
> > What about systems using an older dts, such as one kexec:ing from an
> > older kernel?
>
> Like what? Kexec doesn't work on 4xx yet.
Sure, but similar restrictions would apply for customers who have a
flashed device tree that want to boot a newer kernel. Deprecating old
device tree support is something that should be done very carefully.
> > Just because the device tree source is distributed in the kernel tree
> > doesn't mean it can give up backwards compatibility.
>
> We checked Axon, which is the only non-DTS machine that uses EMAC and
> it will work fine with this change.
Ah, ok. I remember discussions about this patch before then, sounds like
it's safe. I just triggered on the dts-centric patch description.
Objections withdrawn. :)
-Olof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-06 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-06 12:21 [PATCH] net: NEWEMAC: Remove "rgmii-interface" from rgmii matching table Stefan Roese
2008-02-06 12:21 ` Stefan Roese
2008-02-06 12:49 ` Josh Boyer
2008-02-06 12:49 ` Josh Boyer
2008-02-11 16:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-02-11 16:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-02-06 16:01 ` Olof Johansson
2008-02-06 16:01 ` Olof Johansson
2008-02-06 16:23 ` Josh Boyer
2008-02-06 16:23 ` Josh Boyer
2008-02-06 16:35 ` Olof Johansson [this message]
2008-02-06 16:35 ` Olof Johansson
2008-02-07 2:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-02-07 2:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-01-16 9:37 Stefan Roese
2008-01-16 9:37 ` Stefan Roese
2008-01-16 9:39 ` David Gibson
2008-01-16 9:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-01-16 15:01 ` Josh Boyer
2008-01-16 15:01 ` Josh Boyer
2008-01-30 6:16 ` Stefan Roese
2008-01-30 6:16 ` Stefan Roese
2008-01-30 23:14 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-01-30 23:14 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-02-05 21:12 ` Josh Boyer
2008-02-05 21:12 ` Josh Boyer
2008-02-05 21:18 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-02-06 12:12 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-02-06 12:12 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-02-06 12:16 ` Stefan Roese
2008-02-06 12:16 ` Stefan Roese
2008-01-17 20:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080206163554.GA18575@lixom.net \
--to=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=jwboyer@gmail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sr@denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.