From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
deller@gmx.de, jt@hpl.hp.com, rjw@sisk.pl,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] WAVELAN - compile-time check for struct sizes
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 10:49:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080207104912.c719deed.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080207155152.GA3025@tuxdriver.com>
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 10:51:52 -0500 "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 01:59:50PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 21:47:47 +0000
> > Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > > I assume that it's the second BUILD_BUG_ON() which is triggering?
> >
> > yup.
> >
> > > Given that:
> > >
> > > #define MMW_SIZE 37
> > >
> > > is not a multiple of sizeof(unsigned long) this is hardly surprising.
> > >
> > > If structures are used to define a layout of something and must not
> > > contain compiler padding, it must be packed. Given these structures
> > > contain just unsigned char, there's no concerns about >8bit loads
> > > becoming less efficient.
>
> Does a patch like this suffice? I haven't checked whether such a
> patch implies that the BUILD_BUG_ON()'s become unnecessary...
With your patch applied and arm allmodconfig, this
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(ha_t) != HA_SIZE);
triggers
Without your patch applied, these two
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(mmw_t) != MMW_SIZE);
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(ha_t) != HA_SIZE);
are triggering.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-07 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-13 14:16 [PATCH] WAVELAN - compile-time check for struct sizes Helge Deller
2008-02-03 6:45 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-06 20:50 ` Helge Deller
2008-02-06 21:04 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-06 21:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2008-02-06 21:59 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-07 15:51 ` John W. Linville
2008-02-07 16:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2008-02-07 18:49 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-02-07 19:08 ` John W. Linville
2008-02-07 19:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2008-02-07 20:02 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-07 20:46 ` John W. Linville
2008-02-07 21:27 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-13 12:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080207104912.c719deed.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=jt@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.