All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	deller@gmx.de, jt@hpl.hp.com, rjw@sisk.pl,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] WAVELAN - compile-time check for struct sizes
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 14:08:42 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080207190842.GC3025@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080207104912.c719deed.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 10:49:12AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 10:51:52 -0500 "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 01:59:50PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 21:47:47 +0000
> > > Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > 
> > > > I assume that it's the second BUILD_BUG_ON() which is triggering?
> > > 
> > > yup.
> > > 
> > > > Given that:
> > > > 
> > > > #define MMW_SIZE        37
> > > > 
> > > > is not a multiple of sizeof(unsigned long) this is hardly surprising.
> > > > 
> > > > If structures are used to define a layout of something and must not
> > > > contain compiler padding, it must be packed.  Given these structures
> > > > contain just unsigned char, there's no concerns about >8bit loads
> > > > becoming less efficient.
> > 
> > Does a patch like this suffice?  I haven't checked whether such a
> > patch implies that the BUILD_BUG_ON()'s become unnecessary...
> 
> With your patch applied and arm allmodconfig, this
> 
>         BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(ha_t) != HA_SIZE);
> 
> triggers
> 
> Without your patch applied, these two
> 
>         BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(mmw_t) != MMW_SIZE);
>         BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(ha_t) != HA_SIZE);
> 
> are triggering.

The ha_t one triggers either way?  Hmmm...

Russell suggested that the ha_t and psa_t packed attributes were
unnecessary, so I'll include the reduced version just in case the
above is a typo.

---

From: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: [PATCH] wavelan: mark hardware interfacing structures as packed

Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/wavelan.h |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/wavelan.h b/drivers/net/wireless/wavelan.h
index 27172cd..fde4613 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/wavelan.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/wavelan.h
@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ struct mmw_t
 #define	MMW_EXT_ANT_INTERNAL	0x00	/* Internal antenna */
 #define	MMW_EXT_ANT_EXTERNAL	0x03	/* External antenna */
 #define	MMW_EXT_ANT_IQ_TEST	0x1C	/* IQ test pattern (set to 0) */
-};
+} __attribute__ ((packed));;
 
 #define	MMW_SIZE	37
 
@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ struct mmr_t
   unsigned char	mmr_unused4[1];		/* unused */
   unsigned char	mmr_fee_data_l;		/* Read data from EEPROM (low) */
   unsigned char	mmr_fee_data_h;		/* Read data from EEPROM (high) */
-};
+} __attribute__ ((packed));
 
 #define	MMR_SIZE	36
 
-- 
1.5.3.3

-- 
John W. Linville
linville@tuxdriver.com

  reply	other threads:[~2008-02-07 19:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-13 14:16 [PATCH] WAVELAN - compile-time check for struct sizes Helge Deller
2008-02-03  6:45 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-06 20:50   ` Helge Deller
2008-02-06 21:04     ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-06 21:47       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2008-02-06 21:59         ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-07 15:51           ` John W. Linville
2008-02-07 16:06             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2008-02-07 18:49             ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-07 19:08               ` John W. Linville [this message]
2008-02-07 19:50                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2008-02-07 20:02                 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-07 20:46                   ` John W. Linville
2008-02-07 21:27                     ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-13 12:17                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080207190842.GC3025@tuxdriver.com \
    --to=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=jt@hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.