From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [git patches] ocfs2 update
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 20:48:20 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080207124745.4868e108.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080207200944.GQ22671@ca-server1.us.oracle.com>
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 12:09:44 -0800
Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com> wrote:
> /*
> - * dlm_register_domain: one-time setup per "domain"
> + * Compare a requested locking protocol version against the current one.
> + *
> + * If the major numbers are different, they are incompatible.
> + * If the current minor is greater than the request, they are incompatible.
> + * If the current minor is less than or equal to the request, they are
> + * compatible, and the requester should run at the current minor version.
> + */
> +static int dlm_protocol_compare(struct dlm_protocol_version *existing,
> + struct dlm_protocol_version *request)
> +{
> + if (existing->pv_major != request->pv_major)
> + return 1;
> +
> + if (existing->pv_minor > request->pv_minor)
> + return 1;
> +
> + if (existing->pv_minor < request->pv_minor)
> + request->pv_minor = existing->pv_minor;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
It's somewhat obnoxious that what appears to be a straightforward
compare-two-things-and-return-result function will actually modify one of
the things which it is allegedly comparing.
Please integrate checkpatch into your processes - this one had a few little
glitches.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [git patches] ocfs2 update
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 12:47:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080207124745.4868e108.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080207200944.GQ22671@ca-server1.us.oracle.com>
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 12:09:44 -0800
Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com> wrote:
> /*
> - * dlm_register_domain: one-time setup per "domain"
> + * Compare a requested locking protocol version against the current one.
> + *
> + * If the major numbers are different, they are incompatible.
> + * If the current minor is greater than the request, they are incompatible.
> + * If the current minor is less than or equal to the request, they are
> + * compatible, and the requester should run at the current minor version.
> + */
> +static int dlm_protocol_compare(struct dlm_protocol_version *existing,
> + struct dlm_protocol_version *request)
> +{
> + if (existing->pv_major != request->pv_major)
> + return 1;
> +
> + if (existing->pv_minor > request->pv_minor)
> + return 1;
> +
> + if (existing->pv_minor < request->pv_minor)
> + request->pv_minor = existing->pv_minor;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
It's somewhat obnoxious that what appears to be a straightforward
compare-two-things-and-return-result function will actually modify one of
the things which it is allegedly comparing.
Please integrate checkpatch into your processes - this one had a few little
glitches.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-07 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-07 12:11 [Ocfs2-devel] [git patches] ocfs2 update Mark Fasheh
2008-02-07 20:09 ` Mark Fasheh
2008-02-07 20:47 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-02-07 20:48 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Andrew Morton
2008-02-07 13:38 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Mark Fasheh
2008-02-07 21:37 ` Mark Fasheh
2008-02-07 14:29 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Joel Becker
2008-02-07 22:29 ` Joel Becker
2008-02-07 22:17 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-07 22:17 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080207124745.4868e108.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.fasheh@oracle.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.