From: bruno randolf <bruno@thinktube.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org, mcgrof@gmail.com,
jirislaby@gmail.com, mickflemm@gmail.com,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com,
flamingice@sourmilk.net, jbenc@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: enable IBSS merging
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:25:01 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200802121225.02045.bruno@thinktube.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1202341955.9965.26.camel@johannes.berg>
On Thursday 07 February 2008 08:52:35 Johannes Berg wrote:
> Looks fine, one last question:
> > + if (mactime <=3D timestamp) {
> > + if (CONFIG_MAC80211_IBSS_DEBUG || net_ratelimit())
> > + printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: beacon TSF higher than "
> > + "local TSF - IBSS merge with BSSID %s\n",
> > + dev->name, print_mac(mac, mgmt->bssid));
>
> I'd rewrite that as timestamp >=3D mactime and rename the two variabl=
es
> (maybe beacon_timestamp and phy_timestamp or so?), but that's not too
> important.
i'll do that, sure.
> However, in any case "<=3D" seems wrong, shouldn't we only=20
> merge when it's actually higher? If your hardware/firmware has synced
> properly and the PHY delay is accounted for properly etc. then every
> beacon from the own BSS will fulfil the =3D=3D part of the condition,=
no?
true. i was not aware that the beacon timestamp is taking PHY delays in=
to=20
account and wrongly asumed that the RX timestamp should always be a bit=
=20
later.
(which is also what i saw on my atheros hardware: we usually get the RX=
=20
timestamp about 60 to 300 usec later than the beacon timestamp, but it'=
s=20
quite likely that we have not calibrated everything 100% correctly.)
> Also, the beacon timestamp is defined as follows:
>
> A STA sending a beacon shall set the value of the beacon=E2=80=
=99s
> timestamp so that it equals the value of the STA=E2=80=99s TS=
=46 timer at
> the time that the data symbol containing the first bit of the
> timestamp is transmitted to the PHY plus the transmitting STA=
=E2=80=99s
> delays through its local PHY from the MAC-PHY interface to it=
s
> interface with the WM [e.g., antenna, light-emitting diode (L=
ED)
> emission surface].
>
> (IEEE 802.11 11.1.2)
>
> Since we define the RX timestamp to be when the first data symbol of =
the
> frame hits the PHY, we here have to take into account the offset betw=
een
> the two, at 1 MBit that's 192 (=3D24 bytes * 8 usecs/byte) usecs earl=
ier
> than the beacon timestamp.
>
> On the other hand, you're unlikely to hit that window, but I suppose =
it
> warrants at least a comment.
thats a very good point! if everything was calibrated properly and all =
delays=20
taken into account *exactly* that would cause us to go thru a merge all=
the=20
time, on every received beacon. i think we have to take that into accou=
nt,=20
for different bitrates. what about something like:
timestamp >=3D ( mactime + (24 * 8 / beacon_phy_rate_in_mbps ))
i'll resend my patch adding that and the other proposed changes soon.
bruno
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireles=
s" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-12 3:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-05 10:49 [PATCH 0/2] ibss merge resend Bruno Randolf
2008-02-05 10:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] mac80211: move function ieee80211_sta_join_ibss() Bruno Randolf
2008-02-05 10:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] mac80211: enable IBSS merging Bruno Randolf
2008-02-05 11:08 ` Johannes Berg
2008-02-06 2:46 ` [PATCH] addressing johannes latest comments and adding a channel check Bruno Randolf
2008-02-06 2:59 ` [ath5k-devel] " bruno randolf
2008-02-06 2:49 ` [PATCH] mac80211: enable IBSS merging Bruno Randolf
2008-02-06 23:52 ` Johannes Berg
2008-02-08 9:25 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-02-12 3:25 ` bruno randolf [this message]
2008-02-12 9:50 ` Johannes Berg
2008-02-14 6:19 ` bruno randolf
2008-02-14 14:12 ` Johannes Berg
2008-02-12 9:52 ` Johannes Berg
2008-02-14 10:19 ` bruno randolf
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-02-15 15:09 [PATCH 3/3] " Johannes Berg
2008-02-16 2:29 ` [PATCH] " Bruno Randolf
2008-02-17 9:11 ` Johannes Berg
2008-02-18 1:42 ` bruno randolf
2008-02-18 11:15 ` Johannes Berg
2008-02-18 2:03 ` bruno randolf
2008-02-18 11:16 ` Johannes Berg
2008-02-08 9:41 Joerg Pommnitz
2008-01-18 12:52 Bruno Randolf
2008-01-20 10:17 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-01-20 10:43 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-01-21 1:52 ` bruno randolf
2008-01-21 16:05 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-01-22 19:47 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-01-22 19:54 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-01-22 20:32 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-01-22 20:51 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-01-22 23:16 ` Adam Baker
2008-01-22 23:25 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-01-23 14:49 ` Johannes Berg
2008-01-24 5:51 ` bruno randolf
2008-01-21 1:57 ` bruno randolf
2008-01-23 14:48 ` Johannes Berg
2008-01-23 17:22 ` Dan Williams
2008-01-24 3:49 ` bruno randolf
2008-01-24 3:26 ` bruno randolf
2008-01-24 16:55 ` Johannes Berg
2008-01-25 8:01 ` bruno randolf
2008-02-02 23:22 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-02-05 1:50 ` bruno randolf
2008-02-05 1:56 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-02-06 10:01 ` Johannes Berg
2008-02-06 4:34 ` Jouni Malinen
2008-02-06 18:33 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-02-06 20:10 ` John W. Linville
2008-02-07 3:58 ` Jouni Malinen
2008-02-08 9:22 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-02-12 2:00 ` bruno randolf
2008-02-15 1:06 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-02-15 1:40 ` bruno randolf
2008-02-07 3:52 ` Jouni Malinen
2008-02-08 9:10 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-01-24 5:43 ` bruno randolf
2008-01-24 8:51 ` Kalle Valo
2008-01-24 14:27 ` Johannes Berg
2008-01-24 14:30 ` Johannes Berg
2008-01-25 6:16 ` bruno randolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200802121225.02045.bruno@thinktube.com \
--to=bruno@thinktube.com \
--cc=ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org \
--cc=flamingice@sourmilk.net \
--cc=jbenc@suse.cz \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=mcgrof@gmail.com \
--cc=mickflemm@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.