From: Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Konstantin Baydarov <kbaidarov@ru.mvista.com>,
OpenIPMI Developers <openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4/8] IPMI: Don't grab locks in run-to-completion mode
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:27:49 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080213162749.GD9830@minyard.local> (raw)
From: Konstantin Baydarov <kbaidarov@ru.mvista.com>
This patch prevents deadlocks in IPMI panic handler caused by msg_lock
in smi_info structure and waiting_msgs_lock in ipmi_smi structure.
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Baydarov <kbaidarov@ru.mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
---
Index: linux-2.6.24/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.24.orig/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
+++ linux-2.6.24/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
@@ -289,7 +289,8 @@ static enum si_sm_result start_next_msg(
/* No need to save flags, we aleady have interrupts off and we
already hold the SMI lock. */
- spin_lock(&(smi_info->msg_lock));
+ if (!smi_info->run_to_completion)
+ spin_lock(&(smi_info->msg_lock));
/* Pick the high priority queue first. */
if (!list_empty(&(smi_info->hp_xmit_msgs))) {
@@ -329,7 +330,8 @@ static enum si_sm_result start_next_msg(
rv = SI_SM_CALL_WITHOUT_DELAY;
}
out:
- spin_unlock(&(smi_info->msg_lock));
+ if (!smi_info->run_to_completion)
+ spin_unlock(&(smi_info->msg_lock));
return rv;
}
Index: linux-2.6.24/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.24.orig/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
+++ linux-2.6.24/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
@@ -351,8 +351,16 @@ struct ipmi_smi
/* Invalid data in an event. */
unsigned int invalid_events;
+
/* Events that were received with the proper format. */
unsigned int events;
+
+ /*
+ * run_to_completion duplicate of smb_info, smi_info
+ * and ipmi_serial_info structures. Used to decrease numbers of
+ * parameters passed by "low" level IPMI code.
+ */
+ int run_to_completion;
};
#define to_si_intf_from_dev(device) container_of(device, struct ipmi_smi, dev)
@@ -3451,8 +3459,9 @@ static int handle_new_recv_msg(ipmi_smi_
void ipmi_smi_msg_received(ipmi_smi_t intf,
struct ipmi_smi_msg *msg)
{
- unsigned long flags;
+ unsigned long flags = 0; /* keep us warning-free. */
int rv;
+ int run_to_completion;
if ((msg->data_size >= 2)
@@ -3501,21 +3510,30 @@ void ipmi_smi_msg_received(ipmi_smi_t
/* To preserve message order, if the list is not empty, we
tack this message onto the end of the list. */
- spin_lock_irqsave(&intf->waiting_msgs_lock, flags);
+ run_to_completion = intf->run_to_completion;
+ barrier();
+ if (!run_to_completion)
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&intf->waiting_msgs_lock, flags);
if (!list_empty(&intf->waiting_msgs)) {
list_add_tail(&msg->link, &intf->waiting_msgs);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&intf->waiting_msgs_lock, flags);
+ if (!run_to_completion)
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&intf->waiting_msgs_lock, flags);
goto out;
}
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&intf->waiting_msgs_lock, flags);
+ if (!run_to_completion)
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&intf->waiting_msgs_lock, flags);
rv = handle_new_recv_msg(intf, msg);
if (rv > 0) {
/* Could not handle the message now, just add it to a
list to handle later. */
- spin_lock_irqsave(&intf->waiting_msgs_lock, flags);
+ run_to_completion = intf->run_to_completion;
+ barrier();
+ if (!run_to_completion)
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&intf->waiting_msgs_lock, flags);
list_add_tail(&msg->link, &intf->waiting_msgs);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&intf->waiting_msgs_lock, flags);
+ if (!run_to_completion)
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&intf->waiting_msgs_lock, flags);
} else if (rv == 0) {
ipmi_free_smi_msg(msg);
}
@@ -3884,6 +3902,7 @@ static void send_panic_events(char *str)
/* Interface is not ready. */
continue;
+ intf->run_to_completion = 1;
/* Send the event announcing the panic. */
intf->handlers->set_run_to_completion(intf->send_info, 1);
i_ipmi_request(NULL,
@@ -4059,6 +4078,7 @@ static int panic_event(struct notifier_b
/* Interface is not ready. */
continue;
+ intf->run_to_completion = 1;
intf->handlers->set_run_to_completion(intf->send_info, 1);
}
next reply other threads:[~2008-02-13 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-13 16:27 Corey Minyard [this message]
2008-02-13 23:22 ` [PATCH 4/8] IPMI: Don't grab locks in run-to-completion mode Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080213162749.GD9830@minyard.local \
--to=minyard@acm.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=kbaidarov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.