From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: "Thomas, Sujith" <sujith.thomas@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>,
"Mark M. Hoffman" <mhoffman@lightlink.com>,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>,
"Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org,
Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Richard Hughes <hughsient@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: The new thermal management sysfs class, and hwmon
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:56:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080215115614.GA31489@srcf.ucam.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <05B550FD4BD2014E841D83547B62600802AA6977@bgsmsx411.gar.corp.intel.com>
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 04:34:34PM +0530, Thomas, Sujith wrote:
> Len had mentioned in one of his responses that there is scope for
> evolving
> and we can do that. As you pointed out if there are
> differences in the way temperatures are reported out, we can go ahead
> and
> fix it.
That's fine, but it *needs* to be done before 2.6.25 is released.
Otherwise we're stuck with the broken one forever, which is somewhat
longer than ideal.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: "Thomas, Sujith" <sujith.thomas@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>,
"Mark M. Hoffman" <mhoffman@lightlink.com>,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>,
"Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org,
Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Richard Hughes <hughsient@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] The new thermal management sysfs class, and hwmon
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:56:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080215115614.GA31489@srcf.ucam.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <05B550FD4BD2014E841D83547B62600802AA6977@bgsmsx411.gar.corp.intel.com>
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 04:34:34PM +0530, Thomas, Sujith wrote:
> Len had mentioned in one of his responses that there is scope for
> evolving
> and we can do that. As you pointed out if there are
> differences in the way temperatures are reported out, we can go ahead
> and
> fix it.
That's fine, but it *needs* to be done before 2.6.25 is released.
Otherwise we're stuck with the broken one forever, which is somewhat
longer than ideal.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-15 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-03 2:26 The new thermal management sysfs class, and hwmon Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-02-03 2:26 ` [lm-sensors] " Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-02-03 9:31 ` Zhang Rui
2008-02-03 9:31 ` [lm-sensors] " Zhang Rui
2008-02-03 16:44 ` Mark M. Hoffman
2008-02-03 16:44 ` [lm-sensors] " Mark M. Hoffman
2008-02-03 17:50 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-02-03 17:50 ` [lm-sensors] " Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-02-05 10:14 ` Thomas, Sujith
2008-02-05 10:26 ` [lm-sensors] " Thomas, Sujith
2008-02-05 13:57 ` Mark M. Hoffman
2008-02-05 13:57 ` [lm-sensors] " Mark M. Hoffman
2008-02-05 14:55 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-02-05 14:55 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-02-07 7:01 ` Len Brown
2008-02-07 7:01 ` Len Brown
2008-02-07 12:30 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-02-07 12:30 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-02-06 5:23 ` Thomas, Sujith
2008-02-06 5:35 ` [lm-sensors] " Thomas, Sujith
2008-02-13 15:10 ` Thomas Renninger
2008-02-13 15:10 ` [lm-sensors] " Thomas Renninger
2008-02-14 14:08 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-02-14 14:08 ` [lm-sensors] " Matthew Garrett
2008-02-15 11:04 ` Thomas, Sujith
2008-02-15 11:16 ` [lm-sensors] " Thomas, Sujith
2008-02-15 11:56 ` Matthew Garrett [this message]
2008-02-15 11:56 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-02-15 12:19 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-02-15 12:19 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-02-22 5:47 ` zhangrui
2008-02-22 5:47 ` [lm-sensors] " zhangrui
2008-02-22 8:00 ` Hans de Goede
2008-02-22 8:00 ` Hans de Goede
2008-02-22 8:33 ` Zhang, Rui
2008-02-22 8:33 ` Zhang, Rui
2008-02-22 10:54 ` Hans de Goede
2008-02-22 10:54 ` Hans de Goede
2008-02-23 7:43 ` Len Brown
2008-02-23 7:43 ` Len Brown
2008-02-23 8:29 ` Jean Delvare
2008-02-23 8:29 ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
2008-02-24 22:52 ` Zhang, Rui
2008-02-24 22:52 ` [lm-sensors] " Zhang, Rui
2008-02-25 8:53 ` Hans de Goede
2008-02-25 8:53 ` [lm-sensors] " Hans de Goede
2008-02-23 20:39 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-02-23 20:39 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-02-07 6:41 ` Len Brown
2008-02-07 6:41 ` [lm-sensors] " Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080215115614.GA31489@srcf.ucam.org \
--to=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=hughsient@gmail.com \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=mhoffman@lightlink.com \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=sujith.thomas@intel.com \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.