All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
To: Ric Wheeler <ric@emc.com>
Cc: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] Implement barrier support for single device DM devices
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 02:45:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080219024533.GC4066@agk.fab.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47B98D8A.7090506@emc.com>

On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 08:52:10AM -0500, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> I understand that. Most of the time, dm or md devices are composed of 
> uniform components which will uniformly support (or not) the cache flush 
> commands used by barriers.
 
As a dm developer, it's "almost none of the time" because trivial
configurations aren't the ones that require lots of testing effort.

Let's stop arguing over "most of the time":-)

As Andi points out, there are certainly enough real-world users of
"single linear or crypt target using one physical device" for it to be
worth our supporting it.

Alasdair
-- 
agk@redhat.com

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
To: Ric Wheeler <ric@emc.com>
Cc: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>,
	device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] Re: [PATCH] Implement barrier support for single device DM devices
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 02:45:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080219024533.GC4066@agk.fab.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47B98D8A.7090506@emc.com>

On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 08:52:10AM -0500, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> I understand that. Most of the time, dm or md devices are composed of 
> uniform components which will uniformly support (or not) the cache flush 
> commands used by barriers.
 
As a dm developer, it's "almost none of the time" because trivial
configurations aren't the ones that require lots of testing effort.

Let's stop arguing over "most of the time":-)

As Andi points out, there are certainly enough real-world users of
"single linear or crypt target using one physical device" for it to be
worth our supporting it.

Alasdair
-- 
agk@redhat.com

  reply	other threads:[~2008-02-19  2:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-15 12:08 [PATCH] Implement barrier support for single device DM devices Andi Kleen
2008-02-15 12:20 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2008-02-15 13:07   ` Michael Tokarev
2008-02-15 14:20     ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-15 14:12       ` Alasdair G Kergon
2008-02-15 14:12         ` [dm-devel] " Alasdair G Kergon
2008-02-15 15:34         ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-15 15:34           ` [dm-devel] " Andi Kleen
2008-02-15 15:31           ` Alan Cox
2008-02-15 15:31             ` [dm-devel] " Alan Cox
2008-02-18 12:48         ` Ric Wheeler
2008-02-18 12:48           ` [dm-devel] " Ric Wheeler
2008-02-18 13:24           ` Michael Tokarev
2008-02-18 13:52             ` Ric Wheeler
2008-02-18 13:52               ` [dm-devel] " Ric Wheeler
2008-02-19  2:45               ` Alasdair G Kergon [this message]
2008-02-19  2:45                 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2008-05-16 19:55                 ` Mike Snitzer
2008-05-16 19:55                   ` [dm-devel] " Mike Snitzer
2008-05-16 21:48                   ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-16 21:48                     ` [dm-devel] " Andi Kleen
2008-02-18 22:16             ` David Chinner
2008-02-19  2:56               ` Alasdair G Kergon
2008-02-19  2:56                 ` [dm-devel] " Alasdair G Kergon
2008-02-19  5:36                 ` David Chinner
2008-02-19  5:36                   ` David Chinner
2008-02-19  9:43                 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-19  9:43                   ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-19  7:19               ` Jeremy Higdon
2008-02-19  7:19                 ` [dm-devel] " Jeremy Higdon
2008-02-19  7:58                 ` Michael Tokarev
2008-02-20 13:38                 ` Ric Wheeler
2008-02-20 13:38                   ` [dm-devel] " Ric Wheeler
2008-02-21  3:29                 ` Neil Brown
2008-02-21  3:29                   ` [dm-devel] " Neil Brown
2008-02-21  3:39               ` Neil Brown
2008-02-17 23:31     ` David Chinner
2008-02-19  2:39     ` Alasdair G Kergon
2008-02-19  2:39       ` Alasdair G Kergon
2008-02-19 11:12       ` David Chinner
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-09-11 14:12 Mat

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080219024533.GC4066@agk.fab.redhat.com \
    --to=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
    --cc=ric@emc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.