From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "Mark M. Hoffman" <mhoffman@lightlink.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lm-sensors <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] adt7473: New driver for Analog Devices
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:52:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080219105210.2b8b0960@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080218213234.GC5784@tree.beaverton.ibm.com>
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:32:34 -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Ok. I wonder if the nouveau people have any intention to
> reverse-engineer the i2c controller?
There's probably not much to reverse-engineer, the nvidiafb driver has
been supporting the I2C controllers (using software-driven bit-banging)
for a long time now. Maybe the hardware can do better but it's probably
not a big deal as I2C access on a graphics adapter isn't performance
critical.
--
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "Mark M. Hoffman" <mhoffman@lightlink.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lm-sensors <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] adt7473: New driver for Analog Devices ADT7473 sensor chip
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:52:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080219105210.2b8b0960@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080218213234.GC5784@tree.beaverton.ibm.com>
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:32:34 -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Ok. I wonder if the nouveau people have any intention to
> reverse-engineer the i2c controller?
There's probably not much to reverse-engineer, the nvidiafb driver has
been supporting the I2C controllers (using software-driven bit-banging)
for a long time now. Maybe the hardware can do better but it's probably
not a big deal as I2C access on a graphics adapter isn't performance
critical.
--
Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-19 9:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-19 3:41 [lm-sensors] [PATCH] adt7473: New driver for Analog Devices ADT7473 Darrick J. Wong
2007-12-19 3:41 ` [PATCH] adt7473: New driver for Analog Devices ADT7473 sensor chip Darrick J. Wong
2007-12-19 14:47 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] adt7473: New driver for Analog Devices Jean Delvare
2007-12-19 23:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2007-12-19 23:14 ` [PATCH] adt7473: New driver for Analog Devices ADT7473 sensor chip Darrick J. Wong
2008-02-17 20:02 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] adt7473: New driver for Analog Mark M. Hoffman
2008-02-17 20:02 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] adt7473: New driver for Analog Devices ADT7473 sensor chip Mark M. Hoffman
2008-02-18 21:32 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] adt7473: New driver for Analog Darrick J. Wong
2008-02-18 21:32 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] adt7473: New driver for Analog Devices ADT7473 sensor chip Darrick J. Wong
2008-02-19 9:52 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2008-02-19 9:52 ` Jean Delvare
2008-02-18 21:33 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2] adt7473: New driver for Analog Devices Darrick J. Wong
2008-02-18 21:33 ` [PATCH v2] adt7473: New driver for Analog Devices ADT7473 sensor chip Darrick J. Wong
2008-02-19 3:06 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2] adt7473: New driver for Analog Mark M. Hoffman
2008-02-19 3:06 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2] adt7473: New driver for Analog Devices ADT7473 sensor chip Mark M. Hoffman
2008-02-19 9:57 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2] adt7473: New driver for Analog Devices Jean Delvare
2008-02-19 9:53 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] " Jean Delvare
2008-02-19 9:53 ` [PATCH] adt7473: New driver for Analog Devices ADT7473 sensor chip Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080219105210.2b8b0960@hyperion.delvare \
--to=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=djwong@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=mhoffman@lightlink.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.