All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de, andi@firstfloor.org,
	hch@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] x86, fpu: split FPU state from task struct - v3
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 11:28:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080304102804.GA17681@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080303230335.892214000@linux-os.sc.intel.com>


* Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> wrote:

> Split the FPU save area from the task struct. This allows easy 
> migration of FPU context, and it's generally cleaner. It also allows 
> the following two optimizations:

hm, i didnt get a reply from you to:

    http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/3/47

I'm uneasy to apply patches without knowing whether previous problems 
are fixed. In the changelog there's a mention of:

  v3: Fixed the non-atomic calling sequence in atomic context.

is that the same bug?

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-03-04 10:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-03 23:02 [patch 1/2] x86, fpu: split FPU state from task struct - v3 Suresh Siddha
2008-03-03 23:02 ` [patch 2/2] x86, fpu: lazy allocation of FPU area " Suresh Siddha
2008-03-04  1:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-03-04  1:43     ` Suresh Siddha
2008-03-04 10:32       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-04 17:55         ` Suresh Siddha
2008-03-05 19:47           ` Pavel Machek
2008-03-06 15:51             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-06 19:10               ` Suresh Siddha
2008-03-06 20:24               ` Pavel Machek
2008-03-06 20:52                 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-07 12:29                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-07 13:06                   ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-03-07 13:18                     ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-07 13:20                       ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-03-07 13:27                         ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-05 19:48   ` Pavel Machek
2008-03-06 19:26     ` Suresh Siddha
2008-03-06 21:21       ` Pavel Machek
2008-03-04  1:18 ` [patch 1/2] x86, fpu: split FPU state from task struct " Christoph Hellwig
2008-03-04  1:36   ` Suresh Siddha
2008-03-04  8:20     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-06 12:39     ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-03-04 10:28 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-03-04 17:59   ` Suresh Siddha
2008-03-04 20:53     ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080304102804.GA17681@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.