All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
To: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	agl@us.ibm.com, wli@holomorphy.com, clameter@sgi.com, ak@suse.de,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, rientjes@google.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, eric.whitney@hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Mempolicy:  make dequeue_huge_page_vma() obey MPOL_BIND nodemask rework
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 09:35:37 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080307173537.GA24778@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1204838693.5294.102.camel@localhost>

On 06.03.2008 [16:24:53 -0500], Lee Schermerhorn wrote:
> 
> Fix for earlier patch:
> "mempolicy-make-dequeue_huge_page_vma-obey-bind-policy"
> 
> Against: 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 atop the above patch.
> 
> As suggested by Nish Aravamudan, remove the mpol_bind_nodemask()
> helper and return a pointer to the policy node mask from
> huge_zonelist for MPOL_BIND.  This hides more of the mempolicy
> quirks from hugetlb.
> 
> In making this change, I noticed that the huge_zonelist() stub
> for !NUMA wasn't nulling out the mpol.  Added that as well.

Hrm, I was thinking more of the following (on top of this patch):

diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index 4c5d41d..3790f5a 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -1298,9 +1298,7 @@ struct zonelist *huge_zonelist(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
 
 	*mpol = NULL;		/* probably no unref needed */
 	*nodemask = NULL;	/* assume !MPOL_BIND */
-	if (pol->policy == MPOL_BIND) {
-			*nodemask = &pol->v.nodes;
-	} else if (pol->policy == MPOL_INTERLEAVE) {
+	if (pol->policy == MPOL_INTERLEAVE) {
 		unsigned nid;
 
 		nid = interleave_nid(pol, vma, addr, HPAGE_SHIFT);
@@ -1310,10 +1308,12 @@ struct zonelist *huge_zonelist(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
 
 	zl = zonelist_policy(GFP_HIGHUSER, pol);
 	if (unlikely(pol != &default_policy && pol != current->mempolicy)) {
-		if (pol->policy != MPOL_BIND)
+		if (pol->policy != MPOL_BIND) {
 			__mpol_free(pol);	/* finished with pol */
-		else
+		} else {
 			*mpol = pol;	/* unref needed after allocation */
+			*nodemask = &pol->v.nodes;
+		}
 	}
 	return zl;
 }

but perhaps that won't do the right thing if pol == current->mempolicy
and pol->policy == MPOL_BIND. So something like:


diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index 4c5d41d..7eb77e0 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -1298,9 +1298,7 @@ struct zonelist *huge_zonelist(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
 
 	*mpol = NULL;		/* probably no unref needed */
 	*nodemask = NULL;	/* assume !MPOL_BIND */
-	if (pol->policy == MPOL_BIND) {
-			*nodemask = &pol->v.nodes;
-	} else if (pol->policy == MPOL_INTERLEAVE) {
+	if (pol->policy == MPOL_INTERLEAVE) {
 		unsigned nid;
 
 		nid = interleave_nid(pol, vma, addr, HPAGE_SHIFT);
@@ -1309,11 +1307,12 @@ struct zonelist *huge_zonelist(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
 	}
 
 	zl = zonelist_policy(GFP_HIGHUSER, pol);
-	if (unlikely(pol != &default_policy && pol != current->mempolicy)) {
-		if (pol->policy != MPOL_BIND)
-			__mpol_free(pol);	/* finished with pol */
-		else
+	if (unlikely(pol != &default_policy && pol != current->mempolicy
+						&& pol->policy != MPOL_BIND))
+		__mpol_free(pol);	/* finished with pol */
+	if (pol->policy == MPOL_BIND) {
 			*mpol = pol;	/* unref needed after allocation */
+			*nodemask = &pol->v.nodes;
 	}
 	return zl;
 }

Still not quite as clean, but I think it's best to keep the *mpol and
*nodemask assignments together, as if *mpol is being assigned, that's
the only time we should need to set *nodemask, right?

Thanks,
Nish

-- 
Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
IBM Linux Technology Center

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-07 17:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-27 21:47 [PATCH 0/6] Use two zonelists per node instead of multiple zonelists v11r3 Lee Schermerhorn, Mel Gorman
2008-02-27 21:47 ` [PATCH 1/6] Use zonelists instead of zones when direct reclaiming pages Lee Schermerhorn, Mel Gorman
2008-02-27 21:47 ` [PATCH 2/6] Introduce node_zonelist() for accessing the zonelist for a GFP mask Lee Schermerhorn, Mel Gorman
2008-02-27 21:47 ` [PATCH 3/6] Remember what the preferred zone is for zone_statistics Lee Schermerhorn, Mel Gorman
2008-02-27 22:00   ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-28 17:45     ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-29 14:19     ` Mel Gorman
2008-02-29  2:30   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-02-29 14:32     ` Mel Gorman
2008-02-27 21:47 ` [PATCH 4/6] Use two zonelist that are filtered by GFP mask Lee Schermerhorn, Mel Gorman
2008-02-28 21:32   ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-28 21:53     ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-29  2:37       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-02-29 14:50     ` Mel Gorman
2008-02-29 15:48       ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-29 21:07         ` Christoph Lameter
2008-03-04 18:01         ` Mel Gorman
2008-03-05 16:06           ` [PATCH] 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 - Mempolicy: make dequeue_huge_page_vma() obey MPOL_BIND nodemask Lee Schermerhorn
2008-03-05 18:03             ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-03-05 19:02               ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-03-06  1:04                 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-03-06 15:38                   ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-03-06 21:24                   ` [PATCH] Mempolicy: make dequeue_huge_page_vma() obey MPOL_BIND nodemask rework Lee Schermerhorn
2008-03-07 17:35                     ` Nishanth Aravamudan [this message]
2008-03-07 18:31                       ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-03-08  0:27                         ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-03-06  0:39             ` [PATCH] 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 - Mempolicy: make dequeue_huge_page_vma() obey MPOL_BIND nodemask Andrew Morton
2008-03-06 15:17               ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-03-06 18:41     ` [PATCH 4/6] Use two zonelist that are filtered by GFP mask Mel Gorman
2008-02-27 21:47 ` [PATCH 5/6] Have zonelist contains structs with both a zone pointer and zone_idx Lee Schermerhorn, Mel Gorman
2008-02-29  7:49   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-27 21:47 ` [PATCH 6/6] Filter based on a nodemask as well as a gfp_mask Lee Schermerhorn, Mel Gorman
2008-02-29  2:59   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-07 11:56     ` Mel Gorman
2008-02-29  8:48   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-27 21:53 ` [PATCH 0/6] Use two zonelists per node instead of multiple zonelists v11r3 Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-29 14:12 ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080307173537.GA24778@us.ibm.com \
    --to=nacc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
    --cc=agl@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=eric.whitney@hp.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.