From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: Balaji Rao <balajirrao@gmail.com>
Cc: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>,
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Mark kobjects as unitialized
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 22:33:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080309063308.GA5297@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200803090337.16253.balajirrao@gmail.com>
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 03:37:16AM +0530, Balaji Rao wrote:
> On Thursday 06 March 2008 11:35:59 pm Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 11:20:50PM +0530, Balaji Rao wrote:
> > > On Thursday 06 March 2008 10:35:14 pm Greg KH wrote:
> > > <snip>
> > > > Where exactly in the code does that happen? kobjects should not be
> > > > "reused" as that implies that they are static, and not dynamically
> > > > allocated, right?
> > > >
> > > > Which kobject is this?
> > > Yes, its static. Here's the code from virt/kvm_main.c:1269
> > >
> > > static struct sys_device kvm_sysdev = {
> > > .id = 0,
> > > .cls = &kvm_sysdev_class,
> > > };
> > >
> > > this sys_device is being registered/unregistered when kvm-intel is
> > > loaded/unloaded.
> >
> > Ah, ok. I'll add this patch then.
> >
> > > > Ugh, is this the sys_device stuff? I hate that code...
> > > >
> > > Yes it is! But, why do you hate it ?
> >
> > For reasons like this :)
> >
> > kobjects should not be static. the sysdevice stuff was a hack when it
> > was originally created and never touched since the mid 2.5 days. It
> > needs to be fixed up a lot, and is on my TODO list, slowly getting
> > closer to the top...
> Hi,
>
> This patch does not fix it all! The problem is in fact more involved. I also get these BUG reports when I reload kvm-intel.
>
> BUG kmalloc-8: Object already free
> [ 74.696570] -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [ 74.696596]
> [ 74.697310] INFO: Allocated in strndup_user+0x30/0x62 age=587 cpu=2 pid=1439
> [ 74.697845] INFO: Freed in kobject_set_name_vargs+0x29/0x32 age=559 cpu=3 pid=1439
> [ 74.698008] INFO: Slab 0xc16f93a0 used=10 fp=0xf7c9d2d8 flags=0x10000c3
> [ 74.698008] INFO: Object 0xf7c9d1f8 @offset=504 fp=0xf7c9d578
>
> This happens because, sysdev_class_register assigns a name to the
> kobject, and kfrees the old name if any. The poisoned 'name' object
> persists in case of statically allocated kobjects and as its passed to
> kfree again when re registered, we get the above warning.
>
> So, AFAICS the best way to solve this is by fixing the kobject users
> (kvm, oprofile etc.) to use dynamic kobjects instead of static ones or
> memset the kobject to zero before passing it to sysdev_register.
I like the memset idea, how about this patch instead?
thanks,
greg k-h
--- a/drivers/base/sys.c
+++ b/drivers/base/sys.c
@@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ int sysdev_class_register(struct sysdev_
pr_debug("Registering sysdev class '%s'\n",
kobject_name(&cls->kset.kobj));
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cls->drivers);
+ memset(&cls->kset.kobj, 0x00, sizeof(struct kobject));
cls->kset.kobj.parent = &system_kset->kobj;
cls->kset.kobj.ktype = &ktype_sysdev_class;
cls->kset.kobj.kset = system_kset;
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: Balaji Rao <balajirrao@gmail.com>
Cc: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Mark kobjects as unitialized
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 22:33:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080309063308.GA5297@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200803090337.16253.balajirrao@gmail.com>
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 03:37:16AM +0530, Balaji Rao wrote:
> On Thursday 06 March 2008 11:35:59 pm Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 11:20:50PM +0530, Balaji Rao wrote:
> > > On Thursday 06 March 2008 10:35:14 pm Greg KH wrote:
> > > <snip>
> > > > Where exactly in the code does that happen? kobjects should not be
> > > > "reused" as that implies that they are static, and not dynamically
> > > > allocated, right?
> > > >
> > > > Which kobject is this?
> > > Yes, its static. Here's the code from virt/kvm_main.c:1269
> > >
> > > static struct sys_device kvm_sysdev = {
> > > .id = 0,
> > > .cls = &kvm_sysdev_class,
> > > };
> > >
> > > this sys_device is being registered/unregistered when kvm-intel is
> > > loaded/unloaded.
> >
> > Ah, ok. I'll add this patch then.
> >
> > > > Ugh, is this the sys_device stuff? I hate that code...
> > > >
> > > Yes it is! But, why do you hate it ?
> >
> > For reasons like this :)
> >
> > kobjects should not be static. the sysdevice stuff was a hack when it
> > was originally created and never touched since the mid 2.5 days. It
> > needs to be fixed up a lot, and is on my TODO list, slowly getting
> > closer to the top...
> Hi,
>
> This patch does not fix it all! The problem is in fact more involved. I also get these BUG reports when I reload kvm-intel.
>
> BUG kmalloc-8: Object already free
> [ 74.696570] -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [ 74.696596]
> [ 74.697310] INFO: Allocated in strndup_user+0x30/0x62 age=587 cpu=2 pid=1439
> [ 74.697845] INFO: Freed in kobject_set_name_vargs+0x29/0x32 age=559 cpu=3 pid=1439
> [ 74.698008] INFO: Slab 0xc16f93a0 used=10 fp=0xf7c9d2d8 flags=0x10000c3
> [ 74.698008] INFO: Object 0xf7c9d1f8 @offset=504 fp=0xf7c9d578
>
> This happens because, sysdev_class_register assigns a name to the
> kobject, and kfrees the old name if any. The poisoned 'name' object
> persists in case of statically allocated kobjects and as its passed to
> kfree again when re registered, we get the above warning.
>
> So, AFAICS the best way to solve this is by fixing the kobject users
> (kvm, oprofile etc.) to use dynamic kobjects instead of static ones or
> memset the kobject to zero before passing it to sysdev_register.
I like the memset idea, how about this patch instead?
thanks,
greg k-h
--- a/drivers/base/sys.c
+++ b/drivers/base/sys.c
@@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ int sysdev_class_register(struct sysdev_
pr_debug("Registering sysdev class '%s'\n",
kobject_name(&cls->kset.kobj));
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cls->drivers);
+ memset(&cls->kset.kobj, 0x00, sizeof(struct kobject));
cls->kset.kobj.parent = &system_kset->kobj;
cls->kset.kobj.ktype = &ktype_sysdev_class;
cls->kset.kobj.kset = system_kset;
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-09 6:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-06 16:53 [PATCH] Mark kobjects as unitialized Balaji Rao
2008-03-06 16:53 ` Balaji Rao
2008-03-06 17:05 ` Greg KH
2008-03-06 17:05 ` Greg KH
2008-03-06 17:50 ` Balaji Rao
2008-03-06 17:50 ` Balaji Rao
2008-03-06 18:05 ` Greg KH
2008-03-06 18:05 ` Greg KH
2008-03-07 8:56 ` [kvm-devel] " Avi Kivity
2008-03-07 8:56 ` Avi Kivity
2008-03-08 22:07 ` Balaji Rao
2008-03-09 5:06 ` Greg KH
2008-03-09 5:06 ` Greg KH
2008-03-09 6:16 ` Greg KH
2008-03-09 6:16 ` Greg KH
2008-03-09 6:17 ` Balaji Rao
2008-03-09 6:17 ` Balaji Rao
2008-03-09 6:33 ` Greg KH [this message]
2008-03-09 6:33 ` Greg KH
2008-03-09 6:36 ` Balaji Rao
2008-03-09 6:36 ` Balaji Rao
2008-03-09 7:03 ` Greg KH
2008-03-09 7:03 ` Greg KH
2008-03-09 7:21 ` Balaji Rao
2008-03-09 7:21 ` Balaji Rao
2008-03-09 10:49 ` Mikael Pettersson
2008-03-09 10:49 ` Mikael Pettersson
2008-03-10 17:20 ` Greg KH
2008-03-10 17:20 ` Greg KH
2008-03-10 15:52 ` Greg KH
2008-03-10 15:52 ` Greg KH
2008-03-10 16:05 ` Balaji Rao
2008-03-10 16:05 ` Balaji Rao
2008-03-10 17:20 ` Greg KH
2008-03-10 17:20 ` Greg KH
2008-03-06 18:34 ` patch kobjects-mark-cleaned-up-kobjects-as-unitialized.patch added to gregkh-2.6 tree gregkh
2008-03-09 4:58 ` patch patches/driver-core/kobjects-mark-cleaned-up-kobjects-as-unitialized.patch " gregkh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080309063308.GA5297@suse.de \
--to=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=balajirrao@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikpe@it.uu.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.