All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
	Sudhir Kumar <skumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@valinux.co.jp>,
	Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
	lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	taka@valinux.co.jp, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Move memory controller allocations to their own slabs (v3)
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:33:07 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080313140307.20133.30405.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> (raw)



Changelog v3

1. Remove HWCACHE_ALIGN

Changelog v2

1. Remove extra slab for mem_cgroup_per_zone

Move the memory controller data structure page_cgroup to its own slab cache.
It saves space on the system, allocations are not necessarily pushed to order
of 2 and should provide performance benefits. Users who disable the memory
controller can also double check that the memory controller is not allocating
page_cgroup's.

NOTE: Hugh Dickins brought up the issue of whether we want to mark page_cgroup
as __GFP_MOVABLE or __GFP_RECLAIMABLE. I don't think there is an easy
answer at the moment. page_cgroup's are associated with user pages,
they can be reclaimed once the user page has been reclaimed, so it might
make sense to mark them as __GFP_RECLAIMABLE. For now, I am leaving the
marking to default values that the slab allocator uses.

Comments?

Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---

 mm/memcontrol.c |   11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff -puN mm/memcontrol.c~memory-controller-move-to-own-slab mm/memcontrol.c
--- linux-2.6.25-rc5/mm/memcontrol.c~memory-controller-move-to-own-slab	2008-03-13 17:19:01.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc5-balbir/mm/memcontrol.c	2008-03-13 17:19:42.000000000 +0530
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
 #include <linux/backing-dev.h>
 #include <linux/bit_spinlock.h>
 #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/swap.h>
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
 #include <linux/fs.h>
@@ -35,6 +36,7 @@
 
 struct cgroup_subsys mem_cgroup_subsys;
 static const int MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_RETRIES = 5;
+static struct kmem_cache *page_cgroup_cache;
 
 /*
  * Statistics for memory cgroup.
@@ -560,7 +562,7 @@ retry:
 	}
 	unlock_page_cgroup(page);
 
-	pc = kzalloc(sizeof(struct page_cgroup), gfp_mask);
+	pc = kmem_cache_zalloc(page_cgroup_cache, gfp_mask);
 	if (pc == NULL)
 		goto err;
 
@@ -622,7 +624,7 @@ retry:
 		 */
 		res_counter_uncharge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE);
 		css_put(&mem->css);
-		kfree(pc);
+		kmem_cache_free(page_cgroup_cache, pc);
 		goto retry;
 	}
 	page_assign_page_cgroup(page, pc);
@@ -637,7 +639,7 @@ done:
 	return 0;
 out:
 	css_put(&mem->css);
-	kfree(pc);
+	kmem_cache_free(page_cgroup_cache, pc);
 err:
 	return -ENOMEM;
 }
@@ -695,7 +697,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_uncharge_page(struct pag
 		res_counter_uncharge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE);
 		css_put(&mem->css);
 
-		kfree(pc);
+		kmem_cache_free(page_cgroup_cache, pc);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -989,6 +991,7 @@ mem_cgroup_create(struct cgroup_subsys *
 	if (unlikely((cont->parent) == NULL)) {
 		mem = &init_mem_cgroup;
 		init_mm.mem_cgroup = mem;
+		page_cgroup_cache = KMEM_CACHE(page_cgroup, SLAB_PANIC);
 	} else
 		mem = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mem_cgroup), GFP_KERNEL);
 
_

-- 
	Warm Regards,
	Balbir Singh
	Linux Technology Center
	IBM, ISTL

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
	Sudhir Kumar <skumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@valinux.co.jp>,
	Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
	lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	taka@valinux.co.jp, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Move memory controller allocations to their own slabs (v3)
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:33:07 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080313140307.20133.30405.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> (raw)


Changelog v3

1. Remove HWCACHE_ALIGN

Changelog v2

1. Remove extra slab for mem_cgroup_per_zone

Move the memory controller data structure page_cgroup to its own slab cache.
It saves space on the system, allocations are not necessarily pushed to order
of 2 and should provide performance benefits. Users who disable the memory
controller can also double check that the memory controller is not allocating
page_cgroup's.

NOTE: Hugh Dickins brought up the issue of whether we want to mark page_cgroup
as __GFP_MOVABLE or __GFP_RECLAIMABLE. I don't think there is an easy
answer at the moment. page_cgroup's are associated with user pages,
they can be reclaimed once the user page has been reclaimed, so it might
make sense to mark them as __GFP_RECLAIMABLE. For now, I am leaving the
marking to default values that the slab allocator uses.

Comments?

Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---

 mm/memcontrol.c |   11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff -puN mm/memcontrol.c~memory-controller-move-to-own-slab mm/memcontrol.c
--- linux-2.6.25-rc5/mm/memcontrol.c~memory-controller-move-to-own-slab	2008-03-13 17:19:01.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc5-balbir/mm/memcontrol.c	2008-03-13 17:19:42.000000000 +0530
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
 #include <linux/backing-dev.h>
 #include <linux/bit_spinlock.h>
 #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/swap.h>
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
 #include <linux/fs.h>
@@ -35,6 +36,7 @@
 
 struct cgroup_subsys mem_cgroup_subsys;
 static const int MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_RETRIES = 5;
+static struct kmem_cache *page_cgroup_cache;
 
 /*
  * Statistics for memory cgroup.
@@ -560,7 +562,7 @@ retry:
 	}
 	unlock_page_cgroup(page);
 
-	pc = kzalloc(sizeof(struct page_cgroup), gfp_mask);
+	pc = kmem_cache_zalloc(page_cgroup_cache, gfp_mask);
 	if (pc == NULL)
 		goto err;
 
@@ -622,7 +624,7 @@ retry:
 		 */
 		res_counter_uncharge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE);
 		css_put(&mem->css);
-		kfree(pc);
+		kmem_cache_free(page_cgroup_cache, pc);
 		goto retry;
 	}
 	page_assign_page_cgroup(page, pc);
@@ -637,7 +639,7 @@ done:
 	return 0;
 out:
 	css_put(&mem->css);
-	kfree(pc);
+	kmem_cache_free(page_cgroup_cache, pc);
 err:
 	return -ENOMEM;
 }
@@ -695,7 +697,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_uncharge_page(struct pag
 		res_counter_uncharge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE);
 		css_put(&mem->css);
 
-		kfree(pc);
+		kmem_cache_free(page_cgroup_cache, pc);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -989,6 +991,7 @@ mem_cgroup_create(struct cgroup_subsys *
 	if (unlikely((cont->parent) == NULL)) {
 		mem = &init_mem_cgroup;
 		init_mm.mem_cgroup = mem;
+		page_cgroup_cache = KMEM_CACHE(page_cgroup, SLAB_PANIC);
 	} else
 		mem = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mem_cgroup), GFP_KERNEL);
 
_

-- 
	Warm Regards,
	Balbir Singh
	Linux Technology Center
	IBM, ISTL

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

             reply	other threads:[~2008-03-13 14:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-13 14:03 Balbir Singh [this message]
2008-03-13 14:03 ` [PATCH] Move memory controller allocations to their own slabs (v3) Balbir Singh
2008-03-14  2:56 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-14  2:56   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-14 11:16   ` Hugh Dickins
2008-03-14 11:16     ` Hugh Dickins
2008-03-17 11:25   ` Andy Whitcroft
2008-03-17 11:25     ` Andy Whitcroft

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080313140307.20133.30405.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=skumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=taka@valinux.co.jp \
    --cc=xemul@openvz.org \
    --cc=yamamoto@valinux.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.