From: Holger Macht <hmacht@suse.de>
To: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: Set flag DOCK_UNDOCKING when triggered via sysfs
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:14:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080313181456.GC26183@homac.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080313102757.435c9d1a@appleyard>
On Thu 13. Mar - 10:27:57, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:40:35 +0100
> Holger Macht <hmacht@suse.de> wrote:
>
> > On Di 11. Mär - 22:35:22, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 01:07:27 +0100 Holger Macht <hmacht@suse.de>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > begin_undock() is only called when triggered via a acpi notify
> > > > handler (pressing the undock button on the dock station), but
> > > > complete_undock() is always called after the eject. So if a
> > > > undock is triggered through a sysfs write, the flag
> > > > DOCK_UNDOCKING has to be set for the dock station, too. Otherwise
> > > > this will freeze the system hard.
> > > >
> > >
> > > We prefer not to make systems freeze hard.
> > >
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/dock.c b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
> > > > index 307cef6..fa44fb9 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/acpi/dock.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
> > > > @@ -710,6 +710,7 @@ static ssize_t write_undock(struct device
> > > > *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, if (!count)
> > > > return -EINVAL;
> > > >
> > > > + begin_undock(dock_station);
> > > > ret = handle_eject_request(dock_station,
> > > > ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST); return ret ? ret: count;
> > > > }
> > >
> > > I assume that this is needed in 2.6.24.x as well?
> >
> > I tested this, and no, I weren't able to reproduce on 2.6.24.
> >
> > Moreover, it seems that the freeze is related to some libata issue
> > because it only freezes when a drive is in the dock station.
> >
> > Nevertheless, I think the patch is correct. Maybe there's a race
> > involved somewhere I'm not aware of. I really like to wait for
> > Kristen to comment before pushing it into more trees.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Holger
> >
>
> Hum, I'm surprised this caused a freeze - you are sure this fixes your
> problem? This flag is never checked anywhere in the dock code, and if
> it's not set, it will not matter, it will still do the undock. The
> flags file is exported to user space via sysfs though, so maybe because
> the flag isn't being set, some user space script is doing something it
> shouldn't? The patch does seem correct though, so might as well add it.
No, now I know that it doesn't seem to be the root cause. It definitely
helps here, so it seems to be a race.
My userspace does not read the flags file and is doing something bad in
turn of it. The freeze is caused by HAL, which reads /dev/sr0 after
docking, but just before libata detaches the device. We're currently about
to fix this:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/11/418
However, it seems that the patch is not perfect yet :-(
> Acked-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Thanks,
Holger
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Holger Macht <hmacht@suse.de>
To: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: Set flag DOCK_UNDOCKING when triggered via sysfs
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:14:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080313181456.GC26183@homac.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080313102757.435c9d1a@appleyard>
On Thu 13. Mar - 10:27:57, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:40:35 +0100
> Holger Macht <hmacht@suse.de> wrote:
>
> > On Di 11. Mär - 22:35:22, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 01:07:27 +0100 Holger Macht <hmacht@suse.de>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > begin_undock() is only called when triggered via a acpi notify
> > > > handler (pressing the undock button on the dock station), but
> > > > complete_undock() is always called after the eject. So if a
> > > > undock is triggered through a sysfs write, the flag
> > > > DOCK_UNDOCKING has to be set for the dock station, too. Otherwise
> > > > this will freeze the system hard.
> > > >
> > >
> > > We prefer not to make systems freeze hard.
> > >
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/dock.c b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
> > > > index 307cef6..fa44fb9 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/acpi/dock.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
> > > > @@ -710,6 +710,7 @@ static ssize_t write_undock(struct device
> > > > *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, if (!count)
> > > > return -EINVAL;
> > > >
> > > > + begin_undock(dock_station);
> > > > ret = handle_eject_request(dock_station,
> > > > ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST); return ret ? ret: count;
> > > > }
> > >
> > > I assume that this is needed in 2.6.24.x as well?
> >
> > I tested this, and no, I weren't able to reproduce on 2.6.24.
> >
> > Moreover, it seems that the freeze is related to some libata issue
> > because it only freezes when a drive is in the dock station.
> >
> > Nevertheless, I think the patch is correct. Maybe there's a race
> > involved somewhere I'm not aware of. I really like to wait for
> > Kristen to comment before pushing it into more trees.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Holger
> >
>
> Hum, I'm surprised this caused a freeze - you are sure this fixes your
> problem? This flag is never checked anywhere in the dock code, and if
> it's not set, it will not matter, it will still do the undock. The
> flags file is exported to user space via sysfs though, so maybe because
> the flag isn't being set, some user space script is doing something it
> shouldn't? The patch does seem correct though, so might as well add it.
No, now I know that it doesn't seem to be the root cause. It definitely
helps here, so it seems to be a race.
My userspace does not read the flags file and is doing something bad in
turn of it. The freeze is caused by HAL, which reads /dev/sr0 after
docking, but just before libata detaches the device. We're currently about
to fix this:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/11/418
However, it seems that the patch is not perfect yet :-(
> Acked-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Thanks,
Holger
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-13 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-12 0:07 [PATCH] ACPI: Set flag DOCK_UNDOCKING when triggered via sysfs Holger Macht
2008-03-12 5:35 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-12 10:40 ` Holger Macht
2008-03-12 10:40 ` Holger Macht
2008-03-13 17:27 ` Kristen Carlson Accardi
2008-03-13 18:14 ` Holger Macht [this message]
2008-03-13 18:14 ` Holger Macht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080313181456.GC26183@homac.suse.de \
--to=hmacht@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kristen.c.accardi@intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.