All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chr <chunkeey@web.de>
To: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>Christian Kujau
	<lists@nerdbynature.de>
Cc: Samuel Tardieu <sam@rfc1149.net>,
	device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: INFO: task mount:11202 blocked for more than 120 seconds
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:33:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200803132233.47516.chunkeey@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0803131444480.7433@sheep.housecafe.de>

On Thursday 13 March 2008 14:45:39 Christian Kujau wrote:
> and so does -git8 and -git9...sigh :(

hmm, I can boot any of these -rcX-gitY kernels (but not without some stuck 
tasks after about a hour or so...)

but back: I tried lockdep and ran into this: (debug blocker)

pktcdvd: writer pktcdvd0 mapped to sr0

=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
2.6.25-rc5-git3 #2
---------------------------------------------
scsi_id/8262 is trying to acquire lock:
 (&bdev->bd_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff802a8e51>] do_open+0x7b/0x2c0

but task is already holding lock:
 (&bdev->bd_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff802a8e51>] do_open+0x7b/0x2c0

other info that might help us debug this:
2 locks held by scsi_id/8262:
 #0:  (&bdev->bd_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff802a8e51>] do_open+0x7b/0x2c0
 #1:  (&ctl_mutex#2){--..}, at: [<ffffffff88231af2>] pkt_open+0x26/0x516 
[pktcdvd]

stack backtrace:
Pid: 8262, comm: scsi_id Not tainted 2.6.25-rc5-git3 #2

Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff8024ffe4>] __lock_acquire+0x8c9/0xc72
 [<ffffffff804bb23e>] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0xf9/0x105
 [<ffffffff8025079f>] lock_acquire+0x5e/0x77
 [<ffffffff802a8e51>] ? do_open+0x7b/0x2c0
 [<ffffffff804bb336>] mutex_lock_nested+0xe1/0x270
 [<ffffffff802a8e51>] ? do_open+0x7b/0x2c0
 [<ffffffff802a8e51>] do_open+0x7b/0x2c0
 [<ffffffff802a9116>] __blkdev_get+0x80/0x92
 [<ffffffff802a9133>] blkdev_get+0xb/0xd
 [<ffffffff88231b6b>] :pktcdvd:pkt_open+0x9f/0x516
 [<ffffffff802a8e84>] do_open+0xae/0x2c0
 [<ffffffff802a92a4>] ? blkdev_open+0x0/0x6a
 [<ffffffff804bcbab>] ? _spin_unlock+0x26/0x2a
 [<ffffffff802a92a4>] ? blkdev_open+0x0/0x6a
 [<ffffffff802a92db>] blkdev_open+0x37/0x6a
 [<ffffffff80282571>] __dentry_open+0xe6/0x1c0
 [<ffffffff802826e4>] nameidata_to_filp+0x2e/0x40
 [<ffffffff8028272f>] do_filp_open+0x39/0x4b
 [<ffffffff804bcbab>] ? _spin_unlock+0x26/0x2a
 [<ffffffff8028246f>] ? get_unused_fd_flags+0x10d/0x11c
 [<ffffffff80282792>] do_sys_open+0x51/0xd9
 [<ffffffff80282843>] sys_open+0x1b/0x1d
 [<ffffffff8020b22b>] system_call_after_swapgs+0x7b/0x80

soooo.....?

scsi_id/8262 is trying to acquire lock:
 (&bdev->bd_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff802a8e51>] do_open+0x7b/0x2c0

but task is already holding lock:
 (&bdev->bd_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff802a8e51>] do_open+0x7b/0x2c0

sounds a bit strange? Is this a SMP related problem after all?
(*disabled pktcddvd for now... to see if still locks)

Regards,
	Chr...

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chr <chunkeey@web.de>
To: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>,
	Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Cc: Samuel Tardieu <sam@rfc1149.net>,
	device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: INFO: task mount:11202 blocked for more than 120 seconds
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:33:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200803132233.47516.chunkeey@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0803131444480.7433@sheep.housecafe.de>

On Thursday 13 March 2008 14:45:39 Christian Kujau wrote:
> and so does -git8 and -git9...sigh :(

hmm, I can boot any of these -rcX-gitY kernels (but not without some stuck 
tasks after about a hour or so...)

but back: I tried lockdep and ran into this: (debug blocker)

pktcdvd: writer pktcdvd0 mapped to sr0

=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
2.6.25-rc5-git3 #2
---------------------------------------------
scsi_id/8262 is trying to acquire lock:
 (&bdev->bd_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff802a8e51>] do_open+0x7b/0x2c0

but task is already holding lock:
 (&bdev->bd_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff802a8e51>] do_open+0x7b/0x2c0

other info that might help us debug this:
2 locks held by scsi_id/8262:
 #0:  (&bdev->bd_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff802a8e51>] do_open+0x7b/0x2c0
 #1:  (&ctl_mutex#2){--..}, at: [<ffffffff88231af2>] pkt_open+0x26/0x516 
[pktcdvd]

stack backtrace:
Pid: 8262, comm: scsi_id Not tainted 2.6.25-rc5-git3 #2

Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff8024ffe4>] __lock_acquire+0x8c9/0xc72
 [<ffffffff804bb23e>] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0xf9/0x105
 [<ffffffff8025079f>] lock_acquire+0x5e/0x77
 [<ffffffff802a8e51>] ? do_open+0x7b/0x2c0
 [<ffffffff804bb336>] mutex_lock_nested+0xe1/0x270
 [<ffffffff802a8e51>] ? do_open+0x7b/0x2c0
 [<ffffffff802a8e51>] do_open+0x7b/0x2c0
 [<ffffffff802a9116>] __blkdev_get+0x80/0x92
 [<ffffffff802a9133>] blkdev_get+0xb/0xd
 [<ffffffff88231b6b>] :pktcdvd:pkt_open+0x9f/0x516
 [<ffffffff802a8e84>] do_open+0xae/0x2c0
 [<ffffffff802a92a4>] ? blkdev_open+0x0/0x6a
 [<ffffffff804bcbab>] ? _spin_unlock+0x26/0x2a
 [<ffffffff802a92a4>] ? blkdev_open+0x0/0x6a
 [<ffffffff802a92db>] blkdev_open+0x37/0x6a
 [<ffffffff80282571>] __dentry_open+0xe6/0x1c0
 [<ffffffff802826e4>] nameidata_to_filp+0x2e/0x40
 [<ffffffff8028272f>] do_filp_open+0x39/0x4b
 [<ffffffff804bcbab>] ? _spin_unlock+0x26/0x2a
 [<ffffffff8028246f>] ? get_unused_fd_flags+0x10d/0x11c
 [<ffffffff80282792>] do_sys_open+0x51/0xd9
 [<ffffffff80282843>] sys_open+0x1b/0x1d
 [<ffffffff8020b22b>] system_call_after_swapgs+0x7b/0x80

soooo.....?

scsi_id/8262 is trying to acquire lock:
 (&bdev->bd_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff802a8e51>] do_open+0x7b/0x2c0

but task is already holding lock:
 (&bdev->bd_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff802a8e51>] do_open+0x7b/0x2c0

sounds a bit strange? Is this a SMP related problem after all?
(*disabled pktcddvd for now... to see if still locks)

Regards,
	Chr...

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-13 21:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-07 20:32 INFO: task mount:11202 blocked for more than 120 seconds Christian Kujau
2008-03-07 22:40 ` David Chinner
2008-03-07 23:46   ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-08  1:54     ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-09  6:15       ` 2.6.25-rc hangs (was: INFO: task mount:11202 blocked for more than 120 seconds) Christian Kujau
2008-03-09 16:44         ` 2.6.25-rc hangs Eric Sandeen
2008-03-09 18:05           ` Christian Kujau
     [not found]             ` <47D42AD6.10500@sandeen.net>
2008-03-09 18:49               ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-12 18:06                 ` Samuel Tardieu
2008-03-12 21:02                   ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-09 21:34     ` INFO: task mount:11202 blocked for more than 120 seconds David Chinner
2008-03-09 21:34       ` David Chinner
2008-03-10  1:46       ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-12 18:03       ` Samuel Tardieu
2008-03-12 19:53         ` Chr
2008-03-12 23:07           ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-13 13:45             ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-13 21:33               ` Chr [this message]
2008-03-13 21:33                 ` Chr
2008-03-13 21:54                 ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-14  0:15                   ` Chr
2008-03-12 18:03       ` Samuel Tardieu
2008-03-14  9:27       ` Milan Broz
2008-03-14  9:27         ` Milan Broz
2008-03-14 23:58         ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-16 20:33           ` David Chinner
2008-03-16 20:33             ` David Chinner
2008-03-15  0:08         ` Chr
2008-03-15 13:32           ` [dm-crypt] " Chr
2008-03-15 21:34             ` Chr
2008-03-16 13:08               ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-17 17:36                 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2008-03-17 17:36                   ` Alasdair G Kergon
2008-03-17 18:36                   ` Chr
     [not found]                     ` <200803171936.22260.chunkeey-S0/GAf8tV78@public.gmane.org>
2008-03-18 17:46                       ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-18 17:46                         ` [dm-crypt] " Christian Kujau
2008-03-18  0:56                   ` Herbert Xu
2008-03-18  0:56                     ` Herbert Xu
2008-03-18  4:07                     ` Milan Broz
2008-03-18  4:07                       ` Milan Broz
2008-03-22  2:52                   ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-27  8:21                     ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-26 16:57                   ` Chr

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200803132233.47516.chunkeey@web.de \
    --to=chunkeey@web.de \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lists@nerdbynature.de \
    --cc=sam@rfc1149.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.