Re: [PATCH] [6/7] Split large page mapping for AMD TSEG

[Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>]

On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 05:44:21PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > +
> > +	if (!direct_gbpages &&
> > +		c == &boot_cpu_data && c->x86 >= 0xf && c->x86 <= 0x11) {
> > +		unsigned long tseg;
> 
> Can we do this at some place which is only called once ?

Nothing obvious. We could add it, but then would need to add a (imho ugly)
vendor check there first.

I think it is better to have the cpu specific code all in one place.

> 
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Split up direct mapping around the TSEG SMM area.
> > +		 * Don't do it for gbpages because there seems very little
> > +		 * benefit in doing so.
> > +		 */
> > +		if (!rdmsrl_safe(MSR_K8_TSEG_ADDR, &tseg) &&
> 
>  warning: passing argument 2 of 'rdmsrl_safe' from incompatible pointer type  

Yes the type has to be updated after the earlier inline change.
Easiest you just do the trivial change yourself.

-Andi