From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25 regression: powertop says 120K wakeups/sec
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:44:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200803281244.27012.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <924EFEDD5F540B4284297C4DC59F3DEEC83CDD@orsmsx423.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Friday 28 March 2008, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
> >> > I noticed this with 2.6.25-rc2 (if not before), and the problem
> >> > is still there with 2.6.25-rc6-git (as of this AM).
> >
> >A 2.6.24 kernel I still had stashed away didn't act odd; the
> >problem joined us before 2.6.25-rc1 was tagged.
> >
>
> There was a fix that went in recently (one or two days back) that should
> have fixed this.
> Commit 8e92b6605da989
>
> Can you check with latest git to see whether this is still a problem?
The problem is still there in GIT as of this morning, which
includes 8e92b6605da989 ...
Comments on why bc71bec91f9875ef825d12104acf3bf4ca215fa4 seems
to be causing this? I think it's just bad reports getting to
userspace, rather than an actual 120K wakeups/second. (The
report is of course not always 120K, but it's usually in that
range.)
- Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-28 19:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-22 20:24 2.6.25 regression: powertop says 120K wakeups/sec David Brownell
2008-03-23 0:35 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-23 18:04 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-03-28 19:01 ` David Brownell
2008-03-28 19:13 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-03-28 19:13 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-03-28 19:44 ` David Brownell [this message]
2008-03-28 20:30 ` Venki Pallipadi
2008-03-28 21:09 ` David Brownell
2008-03-28 21:55 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-03-28 21:55 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-03-28 22:09 ` David Brownell
2008-03-28 22:56 ` Venki Pallipadi
2008-03-28 23:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-28 23:07 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-03-28 23:07 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-03-31 17:42 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-31 18:34 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-03-31 18:34 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-03-28 23:36 ` David Brownell
2008-03-28 23:51 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-03-28 23:51 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-03-29 0:15 ` David Brownell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-04-24 8:51 Daniel Klaffenbach
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200803281244.27012.david-b@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.