From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25 regression: powertop says 120K wakeups/sec
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:36:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200803281636.04029.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080328225604.GA7136@linux-os.sc.intel.com>
On Friday 28 March 2008, Venki Pallipadi wrote:
> I think I figured out the bug...
>
> Can you try the below patch and confirm that it works (over upstream - ignore
> the earlier revert patch I sent to you).
That seems to do the job ... thanks! One more regression
fixed, it feels like RC7 is almost done. :)
It still says odd things about C0 vs C1 though: powertop
says 100% of the time is in C0, but this patch would seem
to be irrelevant if that were true.
- Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-28 23:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-22 20:24 2.6.25 regression: powertop says 120K wakeups/sec David Brownell
2008-03-23 0:35 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-23 18:04 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-03-28 19:01 ` David Brownell
2008-03-28 19:13 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-03-28 19:13 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-03-28 19:44 ` David Brownell
2008-03-28 20:30 ` Venki Pallipadi
2008-03-28 21:09 ` David Brownell
2008-03-28 21:55 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-03-28 21:55 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-03-28 22:09 ` David Brownell
2008-03-28 22:56 ` Venki Pallipadi
2008-03-28 23:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-28 23:07 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-03-28 23:07 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-03-31 17:42 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-31 18:34 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-03-31 18:34 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-03-28 23:36 ` David Brownell [this message]
2008-03-28 23:51 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-03-28 23:51 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-03-29 0:15 ` David Brownell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-04-24 8:51 Daniel Klaffenbach
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200803281636.04029.david-b@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.