* [patch 0/3] Update vgsplit to only reject splits involving active LVs.
@ 2008-04-10 3:15 dwysocha
2008-04-10 3:15 ` [patch 1/3] Add lv_is_active() to determine whether an lv is active dwysocha
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: dwysocha @ 2008-04-10 3:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lvm-devel
Prior to this change, a VG with any active LVs would cause vgsplit
to fail. However there should be no reason we cannot split a VG,
provided the LVs involved in the split are inactive.
Fixes bz 252041.
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [patch 1/3] Add lv_is_active() to determine whether an lv is active. 2008-04-10 3:15 [patch 0/3] Update vgsplit to only reject splits involving active LVs dwysocha @ 2008-04-10 3:15 ` dwysocha 2008-04-10 3:15 ` [patch 2/3] Update vgsplit to only restrict split with active LVs involved in split dwysocha 2008-04-10 3:15 ` [patch 3/3] Update vgsplit test to verify loosening of active LV restriction dwysocha 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: dwysocha @ 2008-04-10 3:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: lvm-devel An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: lvm2-add-lv-is-active.patch URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/lvm-devel/attachments/20080409/7eae9c4e/attachment.ksh> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [patch 2/3] Update vgsplit to only restrict split with active LVs involved in split. 2008-04-10 3:15 [patch 0/3] Update vgsplit to only reject splits involving active LVs dwysocha 2008-04-10 3:15 ` [patch 1/3] Add lv_is_active() to determine whether an lv is active dwysocha @ 2008-04-10 3:15 ` dwysocha 2008-04-10 3:15 ` [patch 3/3] Update vgsplit test to verify loosening of active LV restriction dwysocha 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: dwysocha @ 2008-04-10 3:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: lvm-devel An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: lvm2-vgsplit-loosen-active-lv-restriction.patch URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/lvm-devel/attachments/20080409/5b9f186a/attachment.ksh> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [patch 3/3] Update vgsplit test to verify loosening of active LV restriction. 2008-04-10 3:15 [patch 0/3] Update vgsplit to only reject splits involving active LVs dwysocha 2008-04-10 3:15 ` [patch 1/3] Add lv_is_active() to determine whether an lv is active dwysocha 2008-04-10 3:15 ` [patch 2/3] Update vgsplit to only restrict split with active LVs involved in split dwysocha @ 2008-04-10 3:15 ` dwysocha 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: dwysocha @ 2008-04-10 3:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: lvm-devel An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: lvm2-update-vgsplit-tests-loosen-lv-active-restriction.patch URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/lvm-devel/attachments/20080409/5eed8acf/attachment.ksh> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-04-10 3:15 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2008-04-10 3:15 [patch 0/3] Update vgsplit to only reject splits involving active LVs dwysocha 2008-04-10 3:15 ` [patch 1/3] Add lv_is_active() to determine whether an lv is active dwysocha 2008-04-10 3:15 ` [patch 2/3] Update vgsplit to only restrict split with active LVs involved in split dwysocha 2008-04-10 3:15 ` [patch 3/3] Update vgsplit test to verify loosening of active LV restriction dwysocha
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.