Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86: modify show_shared_cpu_map in intel_cacheinfo v3

[Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>]

Mike, in response to a suggestion from Bert, wrote:
> I have to subvert the cpumask interface a bit, but the resultant
> code size is about 7 instructions smaller.

I should have read ahead to this discussion, before responding
a minute ago with my suggestion using:

  typedef enum { print_as_mask, print_as_list } map_printer_t;

I slightly dislike the subversion of the cpumask interface,
and slightly -do- like the 7 instructions saved.

Either of these variants (my typedef or Berts function pointer)
would be fine by me, as you prefer, Mike.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.940.382.4214