From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: "Bert Wesarg" <bert.wesarg@googlemail.com>
Cc: travis@sgi.com, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, gregkh@suse.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: add cpus_scnprintf function v3
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:27:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080410112736.6c5ee654.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <36ca99e90804100914n4b08cc9di9a6ab8b936f25644@mail.gmail.com>
Bert wrote:
> My statement from above doesn't reflect my opinion. I'm still in
> flavor with the mask output. And from this discussion, I found a new
> point for the mask output: its bounded ;-)
Ok
> I just wanted to note, that these new list attributes would be the
> only way to 'change' the api, ie. introduce a new api and deprecate
> the old one, and not change the format of the present api.
Agreed
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.940.382.4214
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-10 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-08 18:43 [PATCH 0/3] x86: add cpus_scnprintf function v3 Mike Travis
2008-04-08 18:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86: modify show_shared_cpu_map in intel_cacheinfo v3 Mike Travis
2008-04-08 19:36 ` Bert Wesarg
2008-04-08 20:44 ` Mike Travis
2008-04-10 14:03 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-10 17:24 ` Bert Wesarg
2008-04-10 17:36 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-10 13:57 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-08 18:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] cpumask: use new cpus_scnprintf function v3 Mike Travis
2008-04-08 19:40 ` Bert Wesarg
2008-04-08 20:46 ` Mike Travis
2008-04-09 15:53 ` Bert Wesarg
2008-04-10 12:49 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-10 0:32 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-10 12:13 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-10 14:05 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-08 18:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] cpumask: add show cpu map functions v2 Mike Travis
2008-04-08 19:32 ` Bert Wesarg
2008-04-08 20:52 ` Mike Travis
2008-04-09 17:39 ` Bert Wesarg
2008-04-10 0:29 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-10 6:05 ` Bert Wesarg
2008-04-10 14:13 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-08 19:33 ` [PATCH 0/3] x86: add cpus_scnprintf function v3 Bert Wesarg
2008-04-08 20:54 ` Mike Travis
2008-04-10 15:03 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-09 15:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-09 17:51 ` Bert Wesarg
2008-04-09 20:39 ` Greg KH
2008-04-09 20:52 ` Bert Wesarg
2008-04-09 21:14 ` Greg KH
2008-04-09 21:21 ` Bert Wesarg
2008-04-09 20:59 ` Mike Travis
2008-04-09 21:02 ` Bert Wesarg
2008-04-09 21:15 ` Greg KH
2008-04-10 0:18 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-10 12:10 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-10 16:14 ` Bert Wesarg
2008-04-10 16:27 ` Paul Jackson [this message]
2008-04-10 17:30 ` Greg KH
2008-04-10 17:36 ` Bert Wesarg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080410112736.6c5ee654.pj@sgi.com \
--to=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bert.wesarg@googlemail.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.