All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nadia.Derbey@bull.net
To: efault@gmx.de
Cc: manfred@colorfullife.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, xemul@openvz.org,
	Nadia Derbey <Nadia.Derbey@bull.net>
Subject: [PATCH 13/13] Get rid of ipc_lock_down()
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 18:17:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080411162003.663883000@bull.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20080411161702.460410000@bull.net

[-- Attachment #1: remove_ipc_lock_down.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4605 bytes --]

[PATCH 13/13]

With the previous patch ipc_lock() becomes lockless.
So there is no need anymore for ipc_lock_down()-like routines.

Signed-off-by: Nadia Derbey <Nadia.Derbey@bull.net>

---
 ipc/shm.c  |   21 +++------------------
 ipc/util.c |   52 +---------------------------------------------------
 ipc/util.h |    6 ------
 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6.25-rc8-mm1/ipc/util.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.25-rc8-mm1.orig/ipc/util.h	2008-04-11 17:14:32.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc8-mm1/ipc/util.h	2008-04-11 18:18:44.000000000 +0200
@@ -102,11 +102,6 @@ void* ipc_rcu_alloc(int size);
 void ipc_rcu_getref(void *ptr);
 void ipc_rcu_putref(void *ptr);
 
-/*
- * ipc_lock_down: called with rw_mutex held
- * ipc_lock: called without that lock held
- */
-struct kern_ipc_perm *ipc_lock_down(struct ipc_ids *, int);
 struct kern_ipc_perm *ipc_lock(struct ipc_ids *, int);
 
 void kernel_to_ipc64_perm(struct kern_ipc_perm *in, struct ipc64_perm *out);
@@ -155,7 +150,6 @@ static inline void ipc_unlock(struct ker
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
-struct kern_ipc_perm *ipc_lock_check_down(struct ipc_ids *ids, int id);
 struct kern_ipc_perm *ipc_lock_check(struct ipc_ids *ids, int id);
 int ipcget(struct ipc_namespace *ns, struct ipc_ids *ids,
 			struct ipc_ops *ops, struct ipc_params *params);
Index: linux-2.6.25-rc8-mm1/ipc/util.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.25-rc8-mm1.orig/ipc/util.c	2008-04-11 18:17:08.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc8-mm1/ipc/util.c	2008-04-11 18:19:45.000000000 +0200
@@ -720,56 +720,6 @@ struct kern_ipc_perm *ipc_lock(struct ip
 	return out;
 }
 
-/**
- * ipc_lock_down - Lock an ipc structure with rw_sem held
- * @ids: IPC identifier set
- * @id: ipc id to look for
- *
- * Look for an id in the ipc ids ridr and lock the associated ipc object.
- *
- * The ipc object is locked on exit.
- *
- * This is the routine that should be called when the rw_mutex is already
- * held, i.e. ridr tree protected.
- */
-
-struct kern_ipc_perm *ipc_lock_down(struct ipc_ids *ids, int id)
-{
-	struct kern_ipc_perm *out;
-	int lid = ipcid_to_idx(id);
-
-	rcu_read_lock();
-	out = ridr_find(&ids->ipcs_ridr, lid);
-	if (out == NULL) {
-		rcu_read_unlock();
-		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
-	}
-
-	spin_lock(&out->lock);
-
-	/*
-	 * No need to verify that the structure is still valid since the
-	 * rw_mutex is held.
-	 */
-	return out;
-}
-
-struct kern_ipc_perm *ipc_lock_check_down(struct ipc_ids *ids, int id)
-{
-	struct kern_ipc_perm *out;
-
-	out = ipc_lock_down(ids, id);
-	if (IS_ERR(out))
-		return out;
-
-	if (ipc_checkid(out, id)) {
-		ipc_unlock(out);
-		return ERR_PTR(-EIDRM);
-	}
-
-	return out;
-}
-
 struct kern_ipc_perm *ipc_lock_check(struct ipc_ids *ids, int id)
 {
 	struct kern_ipc_perm *out;
@@ -841,7 +791,7 @@ struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcctl_pre_down(st
 	int err;
 
 	down_write(&ids->rw_mutex);
-	ipcp = ipc_lock_check_down(ids, id);
+	ipcp = ipc_lock_check(ids, id);
 	if (IS_ERR(ipcp)) {
 		err = PTR_ERR(ipcp);
 		goto out_up;
Index: linux-2.6.25-rc8-mm1/ipc/shm.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.25-rc8-mm1.orig/ipc/shm.c	2008-04-11 18:13:13.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc8-mm1/ipc/shm.c	2008-04-11 18:20:44.000000000 +0200
@@ -112,23 +112,8 @@ void __init shm_init (void)
 }
 
 /*
- * shm_lock_(check_)down routines are called in the paths where the rw_mutex
- * is held to protect access to the idr tree.
- */
-static inline struct shmid_kernel *shm_lock_down(struct ipc_namespace *ns,
-						int id)
-{
-	struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp = ipc_lock_down(&shm_ids(ns), id);
-
-	if (IS_ERR(ipcp))
-		return (struct shmid_kernel *)ipcp;
-
-	return container_of(ipcp, struct shmid_kernel, shm_perm);
-}
-
-/*
  * shm_lock_(check_) routines are called in the paths where the rw_mutex
- * is not held.
+ * is not necessarily held.
  */
 static inline struct shmid_kernel *shm_lock(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int id)
 {
@@ -211,7 +196,7 @@ static void shm_close(struct vm_area_str
 
 	down_write(&shm_ids(ns).rw_mutex);
 	/* remove from the list of attaches of the shm segment */
-	shp = shm_lock_down(ns, sfd->id);
+	shp = shm_lock(ns, sfd->id);
 	BUG_ON(IS_ERR(shp));
 	shp->shm_lprid = task_tgid_vnr(current);
 	shp->shm_dtim = get_seconds();
@@ -935,7 +920,7 @@ invalid:
 
 out_nattch:
 	down_write(&shm_ids(ns).rw_mutex);
-	shp = shm_lock_down(ns, shmid);
+	shp = shm_lock(ns, shmid);
 	BUG_ON(IS_ERR(shp));
 	shp->shm_nattch--;
 	if(shp->shm_nattch == 0 &&

--

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-04-11 16:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-11 16:17 [PATCH 00/13] Re: Scalability requirements for sysv ipc Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 01/13] duplicate idr code Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 02/13] Change ridr structure Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 03/13] Fix ridr_pre_get() Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 04/13] Fix ridr_alloc_layer() Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 05/13] Fix free_layer() Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 06/13] Fix sub_alloc() Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 07/13] Fix get_empty_slot() Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 08/13] Fix ridr_get_new_above_int() Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 09/13] Fix ridr_remove() Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 10/13] Fix ridr_find() Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 11/13] Integrate the ridr code Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 12/13] Integrate the ridr code into IPC code Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` Nadia.Derbey [this message]
2008-04-11 16:27 ` [PATCH 00/13] Re: Scalability requirements for sysv ipc Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-14  5:18   ` Nadia Derbey
2008-04-14  7:15     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-14  8:33       ` Nadia Derbey
2008-04-14 10:52         ` Nadia Derbey
2008-04-14 18:54         ` Manfred Spraul
2008-04-15  6:13           ` Nadia Derbey
2008-04-19 23:28         ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-04-21  8:07           ` Nadia Derbey
2008-04-21 14:44             ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-04-14 13:54 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-04-14 15:01   ` Nadia Derbey
2008-04-19 23:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-04-19 23:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-04-21  5:59   ` Nadia Derbey
2008-04-29 14:35   ` Nadia Derbey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080411162003.663883000@bull.net \
    --to=nadia.derbey@bull.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=xemul@openvz.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.