All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nadia Derbey <Nadia.Derbey@bull.net>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: efault@gmx.de, manfred@colorfullife.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, xemul@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] Re: Scalability requirements for sysv ipc
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 07:59:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <480C2D36.5050503@bull.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080419232539.GE20138@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 06:17:02PM +0200, Nadia.Derbey@bull.net wrote:
> 
>>
>>Here is finally the ipc ridr-based implementation I was talking about last
>>week (see http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/4/208).
>>I couldn't avoid much of the code duplication, but at least made things
>>incremental.
>>
>>Does somebody now a test suite that exists for the idr API, that I could
>>run on this new api?
>>
>>Mike, can you try to run it on your victim: I had such a hard time building
>>this patch, that I couldn't re-run the test on my 8-core with this new
>>version. So the last results I have are for 2.6.25-rc3-mm1.
>>
>>Also, I think a careful review should be done to avoid introducing yet other
>>problems :-(
>>
>>*WARNING*: this patch contains a fix for idr.c
>>           I know, I'm doing things bad, but I only saw the problem this
>>           afternoon.
>>
>>It should be applied on linux-2.6.25-rc8-mm1, in the following order:
>>
>>[ PATCH 01/13 ] : copy_idr_code.patch
>>[ PATCH 02/13 ] : change_ridr_struct.patch
>>[ PATCH 03/13 ] : ridr_pre_get.patch
>>[ PATCH 04/13 ] : ridr_alloc_layer.patch
>>[ PATCH 05/13 ] : ridr_free_layer.patch
>>[ PATCH 06/13 ] : ridr_sub_alloc.patch
>>[ PATCH 07/13 ] : ridr_get_empty_slot.patch
>>[ PATCH 08/13 ] : ridr_get_new.patch
>>[ PATCH 09/13 ] : ridr_remove.patch
>>[ PATCH 10/13 ] : ridr_find.patch
>>[ PATCH 11/13 ] : ridr_integrate.patch
>>[ PATCH 12/13 ] : ipc_use_ridr.patch
>>[ PATCH 13/13 ] : remove_ipc_lock_down.patch
> 
> 
> And some more comments on the resulting ridr.c.  Note that we might in
> fact want to keep the rcu_assign_pointer() calls that I complain about --
> see Johannes Berg's posting about making sparse smarter about RCU.
> 

Paul,

Thanks a lot for the review, but I have in any case to rework my 
patches: I have left calls to sleeping functions inside the 
ridr_pre_get() / ridr_preget_end() section which is a very bad thing. 
I'll rework everything and resend.

Regards,
Nadia

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-21  5:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-11 16:17 [PATCH 00/13] Re: Scalability requirements for sysv ipc Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 01/13] duplicate idr code Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 02/13] Change ridr structure Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 03/13] Fix ridr_pre_get() Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 04/13] Fix ridr_alloc_layer() Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 05/13] Fix free_layer() Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 06/13] Fix sub_alloc() Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 07/13] Fix get_empty_slot() Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 08/13] Fix ridr_get_new_above_int() Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 09/13] Fix ridr_remove() Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 10/13] Fix ridr_find() Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 11/13] Integrate the ridr code Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 12/13] Integrate the ridr code into IPC code Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:17 ` [PATCH 13/13] Get rid of ipc_lock_down() Nadia.Derbey
2008-04-11 16:27 ` [PATCH 00/13] Re: Scalability requirements for sysv ipc Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-14  5:18   ` Nadia Derbey
2008-04-14  7:15     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-14  8:33       ` Nadia Derbey
2008-04-14 10:52         ` Nadia Derbey
2008-04-14 18:54         ` Manfred Spraul
2008-04-15  6:13           ` Nadia Derbey
2008-04-19 23:28         ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-04-21  8:07           ` Nadia Derbey
2008-04-21 14:44             ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-04-14 13:54 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-04-14 15:01   ` Nadia Derbey
2008-04-19 23:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-04-19 23:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-04-21  5:59   ` Nadia Derbey [this message]
2008-04-29 14:35   ` Nadia Derbey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=480C2D36.5050503@bull.net \
    --to=nadia.derbey@bull.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=xemul@openvz.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.