All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>,
	linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	takata-TMSiXQfHlQjsTix1lMzHGQ@public.gmane.org,
	linux-m32r-rQhvJZKUsGBRYuoOT4C5/9i2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org,
	Linux-Arch <linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add thread_info_cache_init() to all archs
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:19:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080413171953.bde5e9ac.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080410032354.90CB1DDF0F-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>

On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:22:56 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> Some architecture need to maintain a kmem cache for thread info
> structures. (next patch adds that to powerpc to fix an alignment
> problem).
> 
> There is no good arch callback to use to initialize that cache
> that I can find, so this adds a new one and adds an empty macro
> for when it's not implemented.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> 
> So we have the choice here between:
> 
>  - the ifdef on the func name that I did, consistent with what
> I did before for iomap, which iirc Linus liked
> 
>  - add some more ARCH_HAS_* or HAVE_* (yuck)
> 
>  - add an empty definition to all archs .h (pain in the neck but I
> can do it, though it will be an annoying patch to keep around)
> 
>  - do a weak function (will slightly bloat everybody for no good reason)
> 
> So unless there is strong complaints, I'd like to stick to my
> current approach.
> 
>  include/linux/sched.h |    4 ++++
>  init/main.c           |    1 +
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> --- linux-work.orig/init/main.c	2008-04-10 13:11:06.000000000 +1000
> +++ linux-work/init/main.c	2008-04-10 13:11:19.000000000 +1000
> @@ -623,6 +623,7 @@ asmlinkage void __init start_kernel(void
>  	if (efi_enabled)
>  		efi_enter_virtual_mode();
>  #endif
> +	thread_info_cache_init();
>  	fork_init(num_physpages);
>  	proc_caches_init();
>  	buffer_init();
> Index: linux-work/include/linux/sched.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-work.orig/include/linux/sched.h	2008-04-10 13:11:44.000000000 +1000
> +++ linux-work/include/linux/sched.h	2008-04-10 13:12:05.000000000 +1000
> @@ -1893,6 +1893,10 @@ static inline unsigned long *end_of_stac
>  
>  #endif
>  
> +#ifndef thread_info_cache_init
> +#define thread_info_cache_init	do { } while(0)
> +#endif

This trick does cause a bit of a problem: it is undefined which arch header
file is to provide the alternative definition of thread_info_cache_init.

So we can (and have) ended up in the situation where the override appears
in different files on different architectures and various screwups ensue.

So I'd suggest that we have a bigfatcomment telling implementors which file
the override should be implemented in.  And make sure that this arch file is
directly included from within sched.h.

I have a suspicion that we can still get in a mess if .c files include the
per-arch file and don't include sched.h, but I forget where this happened
and why it broke stuff.

Sigh.  A nice, coded-in-C implementation within each and every architecture
remains the best implementation, and all the little tricks-to-save-typing
have failure modes.

otoh, if only one .c file will ever call this function then I think that
all problems are solved by

a) moving the above ifdeffery into the .c file
b) adding a comment explaining which arch file must provide the override
c) directly including that file from within the .c file.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@ozlabs.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, takata@linux-m32r.org,
	linux-m32r@ml.linux-m32r.org,
	Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add thread_info_cache_init() to all archs
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:19:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080413171953.bde5e9ac.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20080414001953.l5mH2xd4RnkQHw-ECyGlipVx2OU8L53pyUK_G1vc7vo@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080410032354.90CB1DDF0F@ozlabs.org>

On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:22:56 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@ozlabs.org> wrote:

> Some architecture need to maintain a kmem cache for thread info
> structures. (next patch adds that to powerpc to fix an alignment
> problem).
> 
> There is no good arch callback to use to initialize that cache
> that I can find, so this adds a new one and adds an empty macro
> for when it's not implemented.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> ---
> 
> So we have the choice here between:
> 
>  - the ifdef on the func name that I did, consistent with what
> I did before for iomap, which iirc Linus liked
> 
>  - add some more ARCH_HAS_* or HAVE_* (yuck)
> 
>  - add an empty definition to all archs .h (pain in the neck but I
> can do it, though it will be an annoying patch to keep around)
> 
>  - do a weak function (will slightly bloat everybody for no good reason)
> 
> So unless there is strong complaints, I'd like to stick to my
> current approach.
> 
>  include/linux/sched.h |    4 ++++
>  init/main.c           |    1 +
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> --- linux-work.orig/init/main.c	2008-04-10 13:11:06.000000000 +1000
> +++ linux-work/init/main.c	2008-04-10 13:11:19.000000000 +1000
> @@ -623,6 +623,7 @@ asmlinkage void __init start_kernel(void
>  	if (efi_enabled)
>  		efi_enter_virtual_mode();
>  #endif
> +	thread_info_cache_init();
>  	fork_init(num_physpages);
>  	proc_caches_init();
>  	buffer_init();
> Index: linux-work/include/linux/sched.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-work.orig/include/linux/sched.h	2008-04-10 13:11:44.000000000 +1000
> +++ linux-work/include/linux/sched.h	2008-04-10 13:12:05.000000000 +1000
> @@ -1893,6 +1893,10 @@ static inline unsigned long *end_of_stac
>  
>  #endif
>  
> +#ifndef thread_info_cache_init
> +#define thread_info_cache_init	do { } while(0)
> +#endif

This trick does cause a bit of a problem: it is undefined which arch header
file is to provide the alternative definition of thread_info_cache_init.

So we can (and have) ended up in the situation where the override appears
in different files on different architectures and various screwups ensue.

So I'd suggest that we have a bigfatcomment telling implementors which file
the override should be implemented in.  And make sure that this arch file is
directly included from within sched.h.

I have a suspicion that we can still get in a mess if .c files include the
per-arch file and don't include sched.h, but I forget where this happened
and why it broke stuff.

Sigh.  A nice, coded-in-C implementation within each and every architecture
remains the best implementation, and all the little tricks-to-save-typing
have failure modes.

otoh, if only one .c file will ever call this function then I think that
all problems are solved by

a) moving the above ifdeffery into the .c file
b) adding a comment explaining which arch file must provide the override
c) directly including that file from within the .c file.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@ozlabs.org>
Cc: Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-m32r@ml.linux-m32r.org, takata@linux-m32r.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add thread_info_cache_init() to all archs
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:19:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080413171953.bde5e9ac.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080410032354.90CB1DDF0F@ozlabs.org>

On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:22:56 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@ozlabs.org> wrote:

> Some architecture need to maintain a kmem cache for thread info
> structures. (next patch adds that to powerpc to fix an alignment
> problem).
> 
> There is no good arch callback to use to initialize that cache
> that I can find, so this adds a new one and adds an empty macro
> for when it's not implemented.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> ---
> 
> So we have the choice here between:
> 
>  - the ifdef on the func name that I did, consistent with what
> I did before for iomap, which iirc Linus liked
> 
>  - add some more ARCH_HAS_* or HAVE_* (yuck)
> 
>  - add an empty definition to all archs .h (pain in the neck but I
> can do it, though it will be an annoying patch to keep around)
> 
>  - do a weak function (will slightly bloat everybody for no good reason)
> 
> So unless there is strong complaints, I'd like to stick to my
> current approach.
> 
>  include/linux/sched.h |    4 ++++
>  init/main.c           |    1 +
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> --- linux-work.orig/init/main.c	2008-04-10 13:11:06.000000000 +1000
> +++ linux-work/init/main.c	2008-04-10 13:11:19.000000000 +1000
> @@ -623,6 +623,7 @@ asmlinkage void __init start_kernel(void
>  	if (efi_enabled)
>  		efi_enter_virtual_mode();
>  #endif
> +	thread_info_cache_init();
>  	fork_init(num_physpages);
>  	proc_caches_init();
>  	buffer_init();
> Index: linux-work/include/linux/sched.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-work.orig/include/linux/sched.h	2008-04-10 13:11:44.000000000 +1000
> +++ linux-work/include/linux/sched.h	2008-04-10 13:12:05.000000000 +1000
> @@ -1893,6 +1893,10 @@ static inline unsigned long *end_of_stac
>  
>  #endif
>  
> +#ifndef thread_info_cache_init
> +#define thread_info_cache_init	do { } while(0)
> +#endif

This trick does cause a bit of a problem: it is undefined which arch header
file is to provide the alternative definition of thread_info_cache_init.

So we can (and have) ended up in the situation where the override appears
in different files on different architectures and various screwups ensue.

So I'd suggest that we have a bigfatcomment telling implementors which file
the override should be implemented in.  And make sure that this arch file is
directly included from within sched.h.

I have a suspicion that we can still get in a mess if .c files include the
per-arch file and don't include sched.h, but I forget where this happened
and why it broke stuff.

Sigh.  A nice, coded-in-C implementation within each and every architecture
remains the best implementation, and all the little tricks-to-save-typing
have failure modes.

otoh, if only one .c file will ever call this function then I think that
all problems are solved by

a) moving the above ifdeffery into the .c file
b) adding a comment explaining which arch file must provide the override
c) directly including that file from within the .c file.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@ozlabs.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	<linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>, <takata@linux-m32r.org>,
	<linux-m32r@ml.linux-m32r.org>,
	Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add thread_info_cache_init() to all archs
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:19:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080413171953.bde5e9ac.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080410032354.90CB1DDF0F@ozlabs.org>

On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:22:56 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@ozlabs.org> wrote:

> Some architecture need to maintain a kmem cache for thread info
> structures. (next patch adds that to powerpc to fix an alignment
> problem).
> 
> There is no good arch callback to use to initialize that cache
> that I can find, so this adds a new one and adds an empty macro
> for when it's not implemented.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> ---
> 
> So we have the choice here between:
> 
>  - the ifdef on the func name that I did, consistent with what
> I did before for iomap, which iirc Linus liked
> 
>  - add some more ARCH_HAS_* or HAVE_* (yuck)
> 
>  - add an empty definition to all archs .h (pain in the neck but I
> can do it, though it will be an annoying patch to keep around)
> 
>  - do a weak function (will slightly bloat everybody for no good reason)
> 
> So unless there is strong complaints, I'd like to stick to my
> current approach.
> 
>  include/linux/sched.h |    4 ++++
>  init/main.c           |    1 +
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> --- linux-work.orig/init/main.c	2008-04-10 13:11:06.000000000 +1000
> +++ linux-work/init/main.c	2008-04-10 13:11:19.000000000 +1000
> @@ -623,6 +623,7 @@ asmlinkage void __init start_kernel(void
>  	if (efi_enabled)
>  		efi_enter_virtual_mode();
>  #endif
> +	thread_info_cache_init();
>  	fork_init(num_physpages);
>  	proc_caches_init();
>  	buffer_init();
> Index: linux-work/include/linux/sched.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-work.orig/include/linux/sched.h	2008-04-10 13:11:44.000000000 +1000
> +++ linux-work/include/linux/sched.h	2008-04-10 13:12:05.000000000 +1000
> @@ -1893,6 +1893,10 @@ static inline unsigned long *end_of_stac
>  
>  #endif
>  
> +#ifndef thread_info_cache_init
> +#define thread_info_cache_init	do { } while(0)
> +#endif

This trick does cause a bit of a problem: it is undefined which arch header
file is to provide the alternative definition of thread_info_cache_init.

So we can (and have) ended up in the situation where the override appears
in different files on different architectures and various screwups ensue.

So I'd suggest that we have a bigfatcomment telling implementors which file
the override should be implemented in.  And make sure that this arch file is
directly included from within sched.h.

I have a suspicion that we can still get in a mess if .c files include the
per-arch file and don't include sched.h, but I forget where this happened
and why it broke stuff.

Sigh.  A nice, coded-in-C implementation within each and every architecture
remains the best implementation, and all the little tricks-to-save-typing
have failure modes.

otoh, if only one .c file will ever call this function then I think that
all problems are solved by

a) moving the above ifdeffery into the .c file
b) adding a comment explaining which arch file must provide the override
c) directly including that file from within the .c file.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-04-14  0:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-10  3:22 [PATCH 1/2] Add thread_info_cache_init() to all archs Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-04-10  3:22 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-04-10  3:22 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-04-10  3:22 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
     [not found] ` <20080410032354.90CB1DDF0F-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-10 21:46   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-04-10 21:46     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-04-14  0:19   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-04-14  0:19     ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-14  0:19     ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-14  0:19     ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-14  0:38     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-04-14  0:38       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-04-14  2:13       ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-14  2:13         ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-14  2:13         ` Andrew Morton
     [not found]         ` <20080413191338.9776ebd0.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-18  3:58           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-04-18  3:58             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-04-18  3:58             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-04-18  4:19             ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  4:19               ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  4:19               ` Andrew Morton
     [not found]               ` <20080417211905.8ff769fa.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-18  4:38                 ` Michael Ellerman
2008-04-18  4:38                   ` Michael Ellerman
2008-04-18  6:44                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-04-18  6:44                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-04-18  6:44                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-05-21 17:56                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-05-21 17:56                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-05-21 18:41                     ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-21 18:41                       ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-21 19:06                       ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-21 19:06                         ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-21 20:38                         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-05-21 20:38                           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-05-21 19:44                       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-05-21 19:44                         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-05-21 20:52                         ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-21 20:52                           ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  4:21             ` Kyle McMartin
2008-04-18  4:21               ` Kyle McMartin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-04-10 23:36 Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-04-10 23:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-04-10 23:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-04-10 23:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080413171953.bde5e9ac.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm-de/tnxtf+jlsfhdxvbkv3wd2fqjk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=benh-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-m32r-rQhvJZKUsGBRYuoOT4C5/9i2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=paulus-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=takata-TMSiXQfHlQjsTix1lMzHGQ@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.