From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] ARM: always select HAVE_IDE
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 12:33:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080419113356.GA6974@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080417132507.GA9314@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 04:25:07PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> You have a point that one might argue that avr32 should also select
> HAVE_IDE and get an asm/ide.h .
>
> The main difference between avr32 and arm is that on arm there are a
> bunch of platforms that actually want to use drivers/ide/ at the moment,
> and the fine-grained select's we have at the moment don't bring any real
> gain.
>
> I do actually not care much how this gets resolved (we could even
> ditch HAVE_IDE and provide asm/ide.h on all architectures) if there's
> general agreement that this is the way to go.
That is probably a more correct approach.
Consider that if you do have PCMCIA, then you can plug a CF card in and,
therefore, you have an IDE interface in the system. So, selecting
HAVE_IDE if PCMCIA is enabled is entirely reasonable. What isn't so
reasonable is not providing asm/ide.h if your architecture has the
possibility of supporting PCMCIA.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-19 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-14 14:16 [2.6 patch] PCMCIA mustn't select HAVE_IDE Adrian Bunk
2008-04-14 14:16 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-04-14 17:53 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-04-15 20:15 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-04-15 21:23 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-04-15 21:28 ` Russell King
2008-04-15 21:42 ` Russell King
2008-04-15 21:42 ` Russell King
2008-04-15 21:52 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-04-15 22:03 ` Russell King
2008-04-15 22:10 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-04-15 22:39 ` Russell King
2008-04-15 23:26 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-04-15 23:26 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-04-17 9:37 ` [2.6 patch] ARM: always " Adrian Bunk
2008-04-17 9:59 ` Russell King
2008-04-17 10:48 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-04-17 11:00 ` Russell King
2008-04-17 13:25 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-04-19 11:33 ` Russell King [this message]
2008-04-27 18:32 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-04-27 20:29 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-04-27 21:06 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-04-17 12:38 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-04-27 17:53 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-04-15 21:26 ` [2.6 patch] PCMCIA mustn't " Russell King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080419113356.GA6974@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.