From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
kernelnewbies-bounce@nl.linux.org
Subject: Re: script to find incorrect tests on unsigneds
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 14:49:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080419144952.GM20637@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0804182101200.14832@ask.diku.dk>
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 09:08:55PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> I found 63 occurrences of this problem with the following semantic match
> (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/):
>
> @@ unsigned int i; @@
>
> * i < 0
>
> I looked through all of the results by hand, and they all seem to be
> problems. In many cases, it seems like the variable should not be
> unsigned as it is used to hold the return value of a function that might
> return a negative error code, but I haven't looked into this in detail.
>
> In the output below, the lines that begin with a single start contain a
> test of whether an unsigned variable or structure field is less than 0.
> The output is actually generated with diff, but I converted the -s to *s
> to avoid confusion.
> diff -u -p a/fs/ext3/inode.c b/fs/ext3/inode.c
> *** a/fs/ext3/inode.c 2008-03-12 14:13:14.000000000 +0100
> @@ -1263,7 +1263,7 @@ static int ext3_ordered_write_end(struct
> EXT3_I(inode)->i_disksize = new_i_size;
> copied = ext3_generic_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied,
> page, fsdata);
> * if (copied < 0)
> ret = copied;
> }
> ret2 = ext3_journal_stop(handle);
> @@ -1291,7 +1291,7 @@ static int ext3_writeback_write_end(stru
>
> copied = ext3_generic_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied,
> page, fsdata);
> * if (copied < 0)
> ret = copied;
>
> ret2 = ext3_journal_stop(handle);
> diff -u -p a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> *** a/fs/ext4/inode.c 2008-03-12 14:13:14.000000000 +0100
> @@ -1303,7 +1303,7 @@ static int ext4_ordered_write_end(struct
> EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize = new_i_size;
> copied = ext4_generic_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied,
> page, fsdata);
> * if (copied < 0)
> ret = copied;
> }
> ret2 = ext4_journal_stop(handle);
> @@ -1331,7 +1331,7 @@ static int ext4_writeback_write_end(stru
>
> copied = ext4_generic_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied,
> page, fsdata);
> * if (copied < 0)
> ret = copied;
>
> ret2 = ext4_journal_stop(handle);
Fix comparisons of an unsigned int against 0
It's not really feasible to change 'copied' into a signed int, and while
we could cast it for the purposes of this comparison, I think this
rearrangement of the tests is actually clearer than the original.
Reported-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
diff --git a/fs/ext3/inode.c b/fs/ext3/inode.c
index eb95670..60f504b 100644
--- a/fs/ext3/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext3/inode.c
@@ -1261,18 +1261,16 @@ static int ext3_ordered_write_end(struct file *file,
new_i_size = pos + copied;
if (new_i_size > EXT3_I(inode)->i_disksize)
EXT3_I(inode)->i_disksize = new_i_size;
- copied = ext3_generic_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied,
+ ret = ext3_generic_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied,
page, fsdata);
- if (copied < 0)
- ret = copied;
}
ret2 = ext3_journal_stop(handle);
- if (!ret)
+ if (ret >= 0 && ret2)
ret = ret2;
unlock_page(page);
page_cache_release(page);
- return ret ? ret : copied;
+ return ret;
}
static int ext3_writeback_write_end(struct file *file,
@@ -1289,18 +1287,15 @@ static int ext3_writeback_write_end(struct file *file,
if (new_i_size > EXT3_I(inode)->i_disksize)
EXT3_I(inode)->i_disksize = new_i_size;
- copied = ext3_generic_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied,
+ ret = ext3_generic_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied,
page, fsdata);
- if (copied < 0)
- ret = copied;
-
ret2 = ext3_journal_stop(handle);
- if (!ret)
+ if (ret >= 0 && ret2)
ret = ret2;
unlock_page(page);
page_cache_release(page);
- return ret ? ret : copied;
+ return ret;
}
static int ext3_journalled_write_end(struct file *file,
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 945cbf6..69b29c6 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -1301,18 +1301,16 @@ static int ext4_ordered_write_end(struct file *file,
new_i_size = pos + copied;
if (new_i_size > EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize)
EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize = new_i_size;
- copied = ext4_generic_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied,
+ ret = ext4_generic_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied,
page, fsdata);
- if (copied < 0)
- ret = copied;
}
ret2 = ext4_journal_stop(handle);
- if (!ret)
+ if (ret >= 0 && ret2)
ret = ret2;
unlock_page(page);
page_cache_release(page);
- return ret ? ret : copied;
+ return ret;
}
static int ext4_writeback_write_end(struct file *file,
@@ -1329,18 +1327,16 @@ static int ext4_writeback_write_end(struct file *file,
if (new_i_size > EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize)
EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize = new_i_size;
- copied = ext4_generic_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied,
+ ret = ext4_generic_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied,
page, fsdata);
- if (copied < 0)
- ret = copied;
ret2 = ext4_journal_stop(handle);
- if (!ret)
+ if (ret >= 0 && ret2)
ret = ret2;
unlock_page(page);
page_cache_release(page);
- return ret ? ret : copied;
+ return ret;
}
static int ext4_journalled_write_end(struct file *file,
--
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
kernelnewbies-bounce@nl.linux.org
Subject: Re: script to find incorrect tests on unsigneds
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 08:49:52 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080419144952.GM20637@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0804182101200.14832@ask.diku.dk>
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 09:08:55PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> I found 63 occurrences of this problem with the following semantic match
> (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/):
>
> @@ unsigned int i; @@
>
> * i < 0
>
> I looked through all of the results by hand, and they all seem to be
> problems. In many cases, it seems like the variable should not be
> unsigned as it is used to hold the return value of a function that might
> return a negative error code, but I haven't looked into this in detail.
>
> In the output below, the lines that begin with a single start contain a
> test of whether an unsigned variable or structure field is less than 0.
> The output is actually generated with diff, but I converted the -s to *s
> to avoid confusion.
> diff -u -p a/fs/ext3/inode.c b/fs/ext3/inode.c
> *** a/fs/ext3/inode.c 2008-03-12 14:13:14.000000000 +0100
> @@ -1263,7 +1263,7 @@ static int ext3_ordered_write_end(struct
> EXT3_I(inode)->i_disksize = new_i_size;
> copied = ext3_generic_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied,
> page, fsdata);
> * if (copied < 0)
> ret = copied;
> }
> ret2 = ext3_journal_stop(handle);
> @@ -1291,7 +1291,7 @@ static int ext3_writeback_write_end(stru
>
> copied = ext3_generic_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied,
> page, fsdata);
> * if (copied < 0)
> ret = copied;
>
> ret2 = ext3_journal_stop(handle);
> diff -u -p a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> *** a/fs/ext4/inode.c 2008-03-12 14:13:14.000000000 +0100
> @@ -1303,7 +1303,7 @@ static int ext4_ordered_write_end(struct
> EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize = new_i_size;
> copied = ext4_generic_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied,
> page, fsdata);
> * if (copied < 0)
> ret = copied;
> }
> ret2 = ext4_journal_stop(handle);
> @@ -1331,7 +1331,7 @@ static int ext4_writeback_write_end(stru
>
> copied = ext4_generic_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied,
> page, fsdata);
> * if (copied < 0)
> ret = copied;
>
> ret2 = ext4_journal_stop(handle);
Fix comparisons of an unsigned int against 0
It's not really feasible to change 'copied' into a signed int, and while
we could cast it for the purposes of this comparison, I think this
rearrangement of the tests is actually clearer than the original.
Reported-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
diff --git a/fs/ext3/inode.c b/fs/ext3/inode.c
index eb95670..60f504b 100644
--- a/fs/ext3/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext3/inode.c
@@ -1261,18 +1261,16 @@ static int ext3_ordered_write_end(struct file *file,
new_i_size = pos + copied;
if (new_i_size > EXT3_I(inode)->i_disksize)
EXT3_I(inode)->i_disksize = new_i_size;
- copied = ext3_generic_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied,
+ ret = ext3_generic_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied,
page, fsdata);
- if (copied < 0)
- ret = copied;
}
ret2 = ext3_journal_stop(handle);
- if (!ret)
+ if (ret >= 0 && ret2)
ret = ret2;
unlock_page(page);
page_cache_release(page);
- return ret ? ret : copied;
+ return ret;
}
static int ext3_writeback_write_end(struct file *file,
@@ -1289,18 +1287,15 @@ static int ext3_writeback_write_end(struct file *file,
if (new_i_size > EXT3_I(inode)->i_disksize)
EXT3_I(inode)->i_disksize = new_i_size;
- copied = ext3_generic_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied,
+ ret = ext3_generic_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied,
page, fsdata);
- if (copied < 0)
- ret = copied;
-
ret2 = ext3_journal_stop(handle);
- if (!ret)
+ if (ret >= 0 && ret2)
ret = ret2;
unlock_page(page);
page_cache_release(page);
- return ret ? ret : copied;
+ return ret;
}
static int ext3_journalled_write_end(struct file *file,
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 945cbf6..69b29c6 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -1301,18 +1301,16 @@ static int ext4_ordered_write_end(struct file *file,
new_i_size = pos + copied;
if (new_i_size > EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize)
EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize = new_i_size;
- copied = ext4_generic_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied,
+ ret = ext4_generic_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied,
page, fsdata);
- if (copied < 0)
- ret = copied;
}
ret2 = ext4_journal_stop(handle);
- if (!ret)
+ if (ret >= 0 && ret2)
ret = ret2;
unlock_page(page);
page_cache_release(page);
- return ret ? ret : copied;
+ return ret;
}
static int ext4_writeback_write_end(struct file *file,
@@ -1329,18 +1327,16 @@ static int ext4_writeback_write_end(struct file *file,
if (new_i_size > EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize)
EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize = new_i_size;
- copied = ext4_generic_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied,
+ ret = ext4_generic_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied,
page, fsdata);
- if (copied < 0)
- ret = copied;
ret2 = ext4_journal_stop(handle);
- if (!ret)
+ if (ret >= 0 && ret2)
ret = ret2;
unlock_page(page);
page_cache_release(page);
- return ret ? ret : copied;
+ return ret;
}
static int ext4_journalled_write_end(struct file *file,
--
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-19 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-18 16:15 script to find incorrect tests on unsigneds Roel Kluin
2008-04-18 19:08 ` Julia Lawall
2008-04-19 14:05 ` esp_scsi incorrect unsigned test Matthew Wilcox
2008-04-19 14:05 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-04-19 14:16 ` James Bottomley
2008-04-19 14:16 ` James Bottomley
2008-04-20 0:59 ` David Miller
2008-04-20 0:59 ` David Miller
2008-04-19 14:17 ` u14-3f " Matthew Wilcox
2008-04-19 14:17 ` Matthew Wilcox
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0804182101200.14832-QfmoRoYWmW9knbxzx/v8hQ@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-19 14:24 ` script to find incorrect tests on unsigneds Matthew Wilcox
2008-04-19 14:24 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-04-19 14:49 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2008-04-19 14:49 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-04-18 19:36 ` Julia Lawall
2008-04-19 13:29 ` walter harms
2008-04-19 13:43 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-04-19 15:20 ` Julia Lawall
2008-04-19 15:43 ` Julia Lawall
2008-04-22 21:06 ` Julia Lawall
2008-04-22 21:28 ` Roel Kluin
2008-04-23 5:47 ` Julia Lawall
2008-04-23 9:26 ` Roel Kluin
2008-04-23 9:30 ` Roel Kluin
2008-04-23 9:54 ` Julia Lawall
2008-04-23 10:02 ` Julia Lawall
2008-04-23 10:26 ` Roel Kluin
2008-04-23 14:02 ` Roel Kluin
2008-04-23 14:05 ` Roel Kluin
2008-04-23 14:11 ` Roel Kluin
2008-04-23 14:24 ` Julia Lawall
2008-04-23 16:01 ` Roel Kluin
2008-04-23 17:59 ` Roel Kluin
2008-04-23 18:58 ` Julia Lawall
2008-04-23 19:12 ` Julia Lawall
2008-04-23 19:36 ` Roel Kluin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080419144952.GM20637@parisc-linux.org \
--to=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=12o3l@tiscali.nl \
--cc=julia@diku.dk \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernelnewbies-bounce@nl.linux.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.