All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@eu.citrix.com>
To: "Han, Weidong" <weidong.han@intel.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, "Kay,
	Allen M" <allen.m.kay@intel.com>,
	Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>,
	"Xu, Anthony" <anthony.xu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [VTD] Separate VT-d page table from P2M table
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:40:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080422094001.GI4416@implementation.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <08DF4D958216244799FC84F3514D70F00145BFB2@pdsmsx415.ccr.corp.intel.com>

Han, Weidong, le Tue 22 Apr 2008 17:34:11 +0800, a écrit :
> Separate VT-d page table is by default. Shared VT-d page table may be
> easy and good in some cases. So we let them co-exist now. If shared VT-d
> page table is not necessary and useless, we can remove it easily in
> future.

But why unsharing it at all?  Is there any bonus except using more
memory? :)

Samuel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-04-22  9:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-22  8:36 [PATCH] [VTD] Separate VT-d page table from P2M table Han, Weidong
2008-04-22  9:17 ` Keir Fraser
2008-04-22  9:34   ` Han, Weidong
2008-04-22  9:37     ` Keir Fraser
2008-04-22 11:49       ` Han, Weidong
2008-04-22 11:57         ` Ian Pratt
2008-04-22 12:17           ` Han, Weidong
2008-04-22 12:20             ` Keir Fraser
2008-04-22 12:31               ` Han, Weidong
2008-04-22 14:51                 ` Espen Skoglund
2008-04-22 15:02                   ` [PATCH] [VTD] Separate VT-d page table fromP2M table Han, Weidong
2008-04-22 15:43               ` [PATCH] [VTD] Separate VT-d page table from P2M table Li, Xin B
2008-04-22 17:44                 ` Keir Fraser
2008-04-22  9:40     ` Samuel Thibault [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-04-28  8:08 Han, Weidong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080422094001.GI4416@implementation.uk.xensource.com \
    --to=samuel.thibault@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=allen.m.kay@intel.com \
    --cc=anthony.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=weidong.han@intel.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.