All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@google.com>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	thockin@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org,
	joe@perches.com, nil@google.com, matthew@wil.cx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [ETHTOOL]: Add support for large eeproms
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:15:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080425011540.GA30152@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4810EBC5.4060508@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Hi Breno,

My bad. You are correct. There is a bug. In the ethtool user-space app, tg3
and natsemi over-ride the default implementation of dump_eeprom(). In both
tg3_dump_eeprom() and natsemi_dump_eeprom(), there is a magic number check
which is not present in the default implementation.

When fixing the ethtool interface to read large EEPROMs, I snipped the code
which copied the ethtool_eeprom structure back to user-space. I thought it
was read-only. Oops. Looks like tg3 and natsemi are over-writing the magic
number field and then checking it in user-space.

The fix is simple. Add the ethtool_eeprom copy back. I will test and send out
a patch shortly.

Thanks much for finding this:)

Regards,
Mandeep

Breno Leitao (leitao@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> Mandeep,
> 
> Mandeep Singh Baines wrote:
> >I suspect you may have mis-applied the patch. The patch changes both
> >set_eeprom and get_eeprom. I think you may have modified get_eeprom to call
> >ops->set_eeprom instead of ops->get_eeprom. If not, please send me 
> >ethtool.c
> >and tg3.c and I can take a look.
> 
> Well, IMHO the patch is correctly applied as I could see. I just got the 
> David's tree and run a diff between the ethtool.c files (from David's 
> tree and mine), and I get the following differences. Note that I just 
> add a printk() there to "debug" what was going on.
> 
> static int ethtool_get_eeprom(struct net_device *dev, void __user *useraddr)
> {
>        struct ethtool_eeprom eeprom;
> -       const struct ethtool_ops *ops = dev->ethtool_ops;
> +       struct ethtool_ops *ops = dev->ethtool_ops;
>        void __user *userbuf = useraddr + sizeof(eeprom);
>        u32 bytes_remaining;
>        u8 *data;
>        int ret = 0;
> 
> +       printk("<1> ethtool_get_eeprom()\n");
>        if (!ops->get_eeprom || !ops->get_eeprom_len)
>                return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> 
> @@ -330,12 +330,13 @@ static int ethtool_get_eeprom(struct net
> static int ethtool_set_eeprom(struct net_device *dev, void __user 
> *useraddr)
> {
>        struct ethtool_eeprom eeprom;
> -       const struct ethtool_ops *ops = dev->ethtool_ops;
> +       struct ethtool_ops *ops = dev->ethtool_ops;
>        void __user *userbuf = useraddr + sizeof(eeprom);
>        u32 bytes_remaining;
>        u8 *data;
>        int ret = 0;
> 
> +       printk("<1> ethtool_set_eeprom()\n");
>        if (!ops->set_eeprom || !ops->get_eeprom_len)
>                return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> 
> 
> The patched ethtool.c is at  http://rafb.net/p/fWXNwk28.html and tg3.c 
> is at http://rapidshare.com/files/110139941/tg3.c.html
> 
> --
> Breno Leitão
> leitao@linux.vnet.ibm.com

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-25  1:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1207195123.23161.291.camel@localhost>
2008-04-03 18:00 ` [PATCH] [ETHTOOL]: Add support for large eeproms Mandeep Singh Baines
2008-04-04  0:03   ` Joe Perches
2008-04-04  1:41     ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2008-04-12  9:10       ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-14 18:03         ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2008-04-15  7:31           ` David Miller
2008-04-15 17:07             ` Tim Hockin
2008-04-16  2:23               ` David Miller
2008-04-24 18:17                 ` Breno Leitao
2008-04-24 19:01                   ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2008-04-24 20:21                     ` Breno Leitao
2008-04-25  1:15                       ` Mandeep Singh Baines [this message]
2008-04-15 17:39             ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2008-04-16  2:24           ` David Miller
2008-04-03  2:12 Mandeep Singh Baines

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080425011540.GA30152@google.com \
    --to=msb@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=leitao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nil@google.com \
    --cc=thockin@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.