Re: [patch 0/4] Bootmem cleanups

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* Johannes Weiner <hannes@saeurebad.de> wrote:

> Hi Ingo,
> 
> I now dropped the node-crossing patches from my bootmem series and 
> here is what is left over.
> 
> They apply to Linus' current git 
> (0ff5ce7f30b45cc2014cec465c0e96c16877116e).
> 
> Please note that all parts affecting !X86_32_BORING_UMA_BOX are 
> untested!
> 
>  arch/alpha/mm/numa.c             |    8 ++--
>  arch/arm/mm/discontig.c          |   34 ++++++++++-----------
>  arch/ia64/mm/discontig.c         |   11 +++----
>  arch/m32r/mm/discontig.c         |    4 +--
>  arch/m68k/mm/init.c              |    4 +--
>  arch/mips/sgi-ip27/ip27-memory.c |    3 +-
>  arch/parisc/mm/init.c            |    3 +-
>  arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c           |    3 +-
>  arch/sh/mm/numa.c                |    5 +--
>  arch/sparc64/mm/init.c           |    3 +-
>  arch/x86/mm/discontig_32.c       |    3 +-
>  arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c            |    6 +---
>  include/linux/bootmem.h          |    7 +---
>  mm/bootmem.c                     |   59 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  mm/page_alloc.c                  |    4 +--
>  15 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-)

i've read them and the changes all look sane and well-structured - but 
the impact is way too cross-arch for this to even touch x86.git i guess. 
I suspect this is for -mm?

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

	Ingo