From: "Jörn Engel" <joern@logfs.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: LogFS merge
Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 22:33:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080502203352.GC24080@logfs.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080502153114.GA7376@infradead.org>
On Fri, 2 May 2008 11:31:14 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 05:49:38PM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > You probably want an ACK from the VFS maintainers before aiming at
> > mainline. But it surely makes sense to ask Andrew to pull it in -mm
> > now.
>
> Definitively wants a re-review with all the bits from last time fixed.
>
> How did the inode_lock abuse get fixed, btw? That one was rather
> lethal.
That wart is still itching. I thought I'd need a core patch to remove
it, but looking at it again, I might get away with a private spinlock.
Will get fixed.
Jörn
--
Happiness isn't having what you want, it's wanting what you have.
-- unknown
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Jörn Engel" <joern@logfs.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: LogFS merge
Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 22:33:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080502203352.GC24080@logfs.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080502153114.GA7376@infradead.org>
On Fri, 2 May 2008 11:31:14 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 05:49:38PM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > You probably want an ACK from the VFS maintainers before aiming at
> > mainline. But it surely makes sense to ask Andrew to pull it in -mm
> > now.
>
> Definitively wants a re-review with all the bits from last time fixed.
>
> How did the inode_lock abuse get fixed, btw? That one was rather
> lethal.
That wart is still itching. I thought I'd need a core patch to remove
it, but looking at it again, I might get away with a private spinlock.
Will get fixed.
Jörn
--
Happiness isn't having what you want, it's wanting what you have.
-- unknown
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-02 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-02 13:32 LogFS merge Jörn Engel
2008-05-02 14:49 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-05-02 14:49 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-05-02 15:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-02 20:33 ` Jörn Engel [this message]
2008-05-02 20:33 ` Jörn Engel
2008-05-02 16:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-05-02 21:47 ` Jörn Engel
2008-05-02 17:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-02 20:21 ` Jörn Engel
2008-05-02 20:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-02 21:31 ` Jörn Engel
2008-05-02 21:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-02 21:58 ` Jörn Engel
2008-05-03 7:03 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-05-03 9:11 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-03 9:18 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-05-03 9:37 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-03 9:44 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-05-03 11:06 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-03 17:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-03 17:59 ` Offtopic to: " David Collier-Brown
2008-05-02 17:29 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-02 21:34 ` Jörn Engel
2008-05-05 20:31 ` Andrew Morton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-05-03 9:29 matthieu castet
2008-05-03 12:00 ` Jörn Engel
2008-05-03 12:00 ` Jörn Engel
2008-05-04 16:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-04 16:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-04 18:04 ` Josh Boyer
2008-05-04 18:04 ` Josh Boyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080502203352.GC24080@logfs.org \
--to=joern@logfs.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.