From: "Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>
To: Mark Williamson <mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Cc: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] linux/balloon: don't allow ballooningdowna domain below a reasonable limit
Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 13:43:20 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080503134320203.00000041924@djm-pc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200805031832.05664.mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk>
> > MODEL C (guest provides info regularly):
>
> This has the advantage that it can interact with a policy
> implemented in dom0.
> e.g. it's easy to switch on and off automatic memory sizing
> for different
> machines, externally set per-domain minimums and maximums, weight the
> priority should multiple domains compete for the same memory, etc.
Yep, this needs some kind of manager on the domain0 side
for best (better?) results. The disadvantage is that the
communication has latency so by the time domain0 reacts
to a "I have idle memory" message with a "balloon down" message,
the VM might already need ballooning up.
Still this is really the only way to do any reasonably
complex cross-domain memory load balancing.
> > MODEL D (autoballooning):
(oops... I meant selfballooning... autoballooning for
domain0 already exists and seems different so I created
a different term)
> Presumably you'd intend to switch this on and off via
> Xenstore? And perhaps
> control the parameters of the autoballooning via Xenstore too?
Exactly. I don't have parameters in the initial patch, but
some way of controlling "balloon down slowly but balloon up
quickly" is a reasonable next step.
In the end, I envision some cross between the two where a
guest can react quickly to short-term memory pressure but
domain0 still manages each guest's dynamic memory "bracket"
based on QoS goals. But not in the first patch ;-)
Dan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-03 19:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-04 15:07 [PATCH] linux/balloon: don't allow ballooning down a domain below a reasonable limit Jan Beulich
2008-04-05 21:39 ` Keir Fraser
2008-04-07 7:10 ` [PATCH] linux/balloon: don't allow ballooningdown " Jan Beulich
2008-04-29 18:35 ` Dan Magenheimer
2008-04-30 6:29 ` [PATCH] linux/balloon: don't allow ballooningdowna " Jan Beulich
2008-04-30 16:04 ` Dan Magenheimer
2008-04-30 23:49 ` Dan Magenheimer
2008-05-01 7:01 ` Keir Fraser
2008-05-01 14:44 ` Dan Magenheimer
2008-05-01 16:36 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-01 16:56 ` Keir Fraser
2008-05-01 20:05 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-01 16:59 ` Dan Magenheimer
2008-05-01 21:18 ` Keir Fraser
2008-05-01 23:03 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-01 23:27 ` Dan Magenheimer
2008-05-02 7:05 ` Keir Fraser
2008-05-03 13:53 ` Dan Magenheimer
2008-05-03 14:11 ` Keir Fraser
2008-05-03 19:27 ` Dan Magenheimer
2008-05-03 17:32 ` Mark Williamson
2008-05-03 19:43 ` Dan Magenheimer [this message]
2008-05-12 22:19 ` [PATCH] linux/balloon: don't allowballooningdowna " Ian Pratt
2008-05-12 23:34 ` Dan Magenheimer
2008-05-13 10:35 ` Markus Hochholdinger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-05-02 19:30 [PATCH] linux/balloon:don't allow ballooningdowna " Jan Beulich
2008-05-02 22:22 ` Dan Magenheimer
2008-05-03 13:24 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2008-05-09 20:38 ` Dan Magenheimer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080503134320203.00000041924@djm-pc \
--to=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
--cc=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.