All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Possible GPL violation in Linux-based IPTV set top box
@ 2008-05-05  3:47 Robert Kelly III
  2008-05-05  4:40 ` Arjan van de Ven
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Robert Kelly III @ 2008-05-05  3:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel; +Cc: legal

The company I work for, SkyAngel, has recently swapped from satelite broadcast 
to IPTV. The set top box we are using runs Linux according to NeuLion, our 
partner company who supplies the STB. When we distribute the set top boxes, 
however, there is no disclaimer of warranty, copy of the GPL, offer for 
source code, or any mention of Linux as far as I can find. Isn't this a 
violation of the GPL and your copyright? I have raised concerns about the 
situation, but everyone here seems convinced it is somehow ok. 

What should be done about this? I am not sure who would be responsible as it 
seems NeuLion or some associate makes the STB and takes care of the software, 
but we sell it to our customers. Is there any possible way I might have 
missed that this could actually be permissible?

Robert A. Kelly III

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: Possible GPL violation in Linux-based IPTV set top box
  2008-05-05  3:47 Possible GPL violation in Linux-based IPTV set top box Robert Kelly III
@ 2008-05-05  4:40 ` Arjan van de Ven
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Arjan van de Ven @ 2008-05-05  4:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Robert Kelly III; +Cc: linux-kernel, legal

On Sun, 4 May 2008 23:47:24 -0400
Robert Kelly III <bluethegrappler@gmail.com> wrote:

> The company I work for, SkyAngel, has recently swapped from satelite
> broadcast to IPTV. The set top box we are using runs Linux according
> to NeuLion, our partner company who supplies the STB. When we
> distribute the set top boxes, however, there is no disclaimer of
> warranty, copy of the GPL, offer for source code, or any mention of
> Linux as far as I can find. Isn't this a violation of the GPL and
> your copyright? I have raised concerns about the situation, but
> everyone here seems convinced it is somehow ok. 
> 
> What should be done about this? I am not sure who would be
> responsible as it seems NeuLion or some associate makes the STB and
> takes care of the software, but we sell it to our customers. Is there
> any possible way I might have missed that this could actually be
> permissible?

you should ask a lawyer, not here; your question is offtopic for this
list... there's no lawyers here.

Or if that's a really big step, you could ask Harald Welte or the
Software Freedom Law Center; both have a lot of experience with this
sort of thing.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-05-05  4:40 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-05-05  3:47 Possible GPL violation in Linux-based IPTV set top box Robert Kelly III
2008-05-05  4:40 ` Arjan van de Ven

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.