From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: hch@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, menage@google.com
Subject: Re: [patch 03/15] cgroup: dont call vfs_mkdir
Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 09:08:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080505130804.GA1809@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1Jszri-0005uq-4x@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 02:32:22PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > Looks correct but I don't think it's a good idea. Spreading more logic
> > into filesystems without a good reason is rarely a good idea.
>
> (Thanks for the review, Christoph)
>
> Agreed completely, but vfs_* aren't for filesystems to call, rather
> for entities calling _into_ filesystems from the outside. This is
> actually a very rare thing, so adding some extra logic for the sake of
> cleanliness should be OK.
>
> Now it can be argued, that cgroup_clone() is calling into the
> filesystem from the outside. But it's not really doing that, rather
> it's making an internal modification to a specific filesystem,
> triggered by some external action.
I don't think that matters. We're not about overly strict layering, and
especialy this kind where you call into a higher layer to get back into
the lower one is not harmful at all. For cgroup it's only a small
duplication, but e.g. I don't really like all the duplications in the
reiserfs case. Unless we have a very good reason why the useage of the
vfs_ function should go away from the filesystem code I don't think
we want this.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-05 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-05 9:54 [patch 00/15] VFS fixes and cleanups Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-05 9:54 ` [patch 01/15] ecryptfs: clean up (un)lock_parent Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-05 10:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-05 9:54 ` [patch 02/15] nfsd: clean up mnt_want_write calls Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-05 10:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-05 9:54 ` [patch 03/15] cgroup: dont call vfs_mkdir Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-05 11:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-05 12:32 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-05 13:08 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2008-05-05 13:29 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-05 13:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-05 13:43 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-05 13:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-05 13:57 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-05 17:22 ` Paul Menage
2008-05-05 9:54 ` [patch 04/15] reiserfs: dont call vfs_rmdir Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-05 9:54 ` [patch 05/15] reiserfs: dont call notify_change Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-05 9:54 ` [patch 06/15] sysfs: " Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-06 4:15 ` Greg KH
2008-05-06 6:28 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-06 6:48 ` Greg KH
2008-05-05 9:54 ` [patch 07/15] hpfs: " Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-08 0:42 ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-05-05 9:54 ` [patch 08/15] fat: " Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-05 19:45 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2008-05-06 8:49 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-06 9:27 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2008-05-05 9:54 ` [patch 09/15] vfs: immutable inode checking cleanup Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-05 11:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-05 9:54 ` [patch 10/15] vfs: truncate: dont check immutable twice Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-05 11:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-05 9:54 ` [patch 11/15] vfs: truncate: append-only checking cleanup Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-05 11:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-05 9:54 ` [patch 12/15] vfs: create file_truncate() helper Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-05 11:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-05 12:35 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-05 9:54 ` [patch 13/15] vfs: utimes cleanup Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-05 11:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-05 12:39 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-05 13:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-05 9:54 ` [patch 14/15] vfs: utimes immutable fix Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-05 11:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-05 9:54 ` [patch 15/15] vfs: splice remove_suid() cleanup Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-05 11:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-07 7:20 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080505130804.GA1809@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.