From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
Tomas Winkler <tomasw@gmail.com>, Helmut Schaa <hschaa@suse.de>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5] mac80211: fix NULL pointer dereference in ieee80211_compatible_rates
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 10:20:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080520142012.GA1106@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4832D661.60902@lwfinger.net>
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 08:47:13AM -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> Johannes Berg wrote:
>>>> Thing is, I'm not totally convinced it is wrong to the code while it may
>>>> or may not be wrong...
>>> Doesn't should be bss pinned int he bss list if you are associating to
>>> it. If it's not there you don't have access to it's info It looks very
>>> wrong to me.
>>
>> Well, yes, it is a bit odd.
>>
>>>> I think this patch should go in first as it
>>>> actually fixes the oops, and then we can discuss the merits of adding a
>>>> warning there separately. Maybe after we look a bit at the code and try
>>>> to figure out whether it can still happen after that patch from
>>>> Abhijeet.
>>> I'm not sure if this patch is complete without this warning. What is
>>> in the else statement is a hack and it should be obvious.
>>
>> Considering that the message won't help us at all, why bother? We know
>> it's triggering, we know this might be a problem, and we know we can
>> only solve it by auditing the code. So why add a message that will get
>> us countless emails/complaints from people we cannot do anything about
>> anyway without doing the audit?
>
> This argument could go on endlessly; however, it is clear that we need to
> settle on a patch and get it upstream ASAP! Now that mainline is broken,
> the urgency is _MUCH_ greater.
I agree. I'll take this one unless someone finds a problem with it.
John
--
John W. Linville
linville@tuxdriver.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-20 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-20 7:56 [PATCHv5] mac80211: fix NULL pointer dereference in ieee80211_compatible_rates Helmut Schaa
2008-05-20 12:54 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-05-20 12:57 ` Johannes Berg
2008-05-20 13:11 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-05-20 13:22 ` Johannes Berg
2008-05-20 13:33 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-05-20 13:38 ` Johannes Berg
2008-05-20 13:44 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-05-20 13:47 ` Larry Finger
2008-05-20 14:20 ` John W. Linville [this message]
2008-05-20 14:41 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-05-21 10:47 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-05-21 13:54 ` John W. Linville
2008-05-21 14:50 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-05-21 15:08 ` Johannes Berg
2008-05-21 15:11 ` Tomas Winkler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080520142012.GA1106@tuxdriver.com \
--to=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hschaa@suse.de \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tomasw@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.