From: "Kristian Høgsberg" <krh@bitplanet.net>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: "Rik van Riel" <riel@redhat.com>,
"Kristian Høgsberg" <krh@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Use structs instead of hardcoded offsets in x86 boot decompressor.
Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 00:25:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080525042527.GA12989@bitplanet.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4838E5D4.4050708@zytor.com>
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 09:06:44PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Rik van Riel wrote:
>> On Fri, 23 May 2008 23:17:01 -0700
>> "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Uhm... except it doesn't live at address zero, at all.
>>>
>>> It's called "zeropage" because we used to recycle it into
>>> empty_zero_page, a long long time ago.
>>>
>>> The bootparms structure is pointed to by %esi being passed from the setup
>>> code to the decompressor to the kernel.
>>
>> Then why does dereferencing the uninitialized
>> pointer work, both in the code before and after
>> the patch?
>>
>> What am I misssing?
>
> Heck if I know. It definitely *shouldn't* work...
Damn, I lost a chunk of the patch. There's supposed to be a
rm_screen_info = &real_mode->screen_info;
after the real_mode = rmode assignment. In the code before,
RM_SCREEN_INFO was a macro that just referenced the real_mode pointer:
#define RM_SCREEN_INFO (*(struct screen_info *)(real_mode+0))
Thanks, wil resend.
Kristian
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-25 4:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-23 21:59 [PATCH 1/2] Use structs instead of hardcoded offsets in x86 boot decompressor Kristian Høgsberg
2008-05-23 21:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] Only print "Decompressing Linux" etc when 'noisy' is passed Kristian Høgsberg
2008-05-23 22:42 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-05-24 9:25 ` Mikael Pettersson
2008-05-24 18:07 ` Diego Calleja
2008-05-24 1:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] Use structs instead of hardcoded offsets in x86 boot decompressor Rik van Riel
2008-05-24 6:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-05-25 4:03 ` Rik van Riel
2008-05-25 4:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-05-25 4:25 ` Kristian Høgsberg [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080525042527.GA12989@bitplanet.net \
--to=krh@bitplanet.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=krh@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.