All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [uml-devel] [PATCH 5/6] UML - stub needs to tolerate SIGWINCH
@ 2008-06-03 19:02 ` Jeff Dike
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Dike @ 2008-06-03 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Morton, LKML, uml-devel; +Cc: Benedict Verheyen

We lost the marking of SIGWINCH as being OK to receive during stub
execution, causing a panic should that happen.

Cc: Benedict Verheyen <benedict.verheyen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux-2.6.22/arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.22.orig/arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c	2008-04-14 10:44:33.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.22/arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c	2008-05-13 11:37:35.000000000 -0400
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static int ptrace_dump_regs(int pid)
  * Signals that are OK to receive in the stub - we'll just continue it.
  * SIGWINCH will happen when UML is inside a detached screen.
  */
-#define STUB_SIG_MASK (1 << SIGVTALRM)
+#define STUB_SIG_MASK ((1 << SIGVTALRM) | (1 << SIGWINCH))
 
 /* Signals that the stub will finish with - anything else is an error */
 #define STUB_DONE_MASK (1 << SIGTRAP)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 5/6] UML - stub needs to tolerate SIGWINCH
@ 2008-06-03 19:02 ` Jeff Dike
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Dike @ 2008-06-03 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Morton, LKML, uml-devel; +Cc: Benedict Verheyen

We lost the marking of SIGWINCH as being OK to receive during stub
execution, causing a panic should that happen.

Cc: Benedict Verheyen <benedict.verheyen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux-2.6.22/arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.22.orig/arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c	2008-04-14 10:44:33.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.22/arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c	2008-05-13 11:37:35.000000000 -0400
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static int ptrace_dump_regs(int pid)
  * Signals that are OK to receive in the stub - we'll just continue it.
  * SIGWINCH will happen when UML is inside a detached screen.
  */
-#define STUB_SIG_MASK (1 << SIGVTALRM)
+#define STUB_SIG_MASK ((1 << SIGVTALRM) | (1 << SIGWINCH))
 
 /* Signals that the stub will finish with - anything else is an error */
 #define STUB_DONE_MASK (1 << SIGTRAP)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-06-03 19:04 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-06-03 19:02 [uml-devel] [PATCH 5/6] UML - stub needs to tolerate SIGWINCH Jeff Dike
2008-06-03 19:02 ` Jeff Dike

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.