From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Commit annotations (was:: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?)
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 22:27:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200806032227.02951.jnareb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0806031244290.3473@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> One of the things I could imagine using git for is to have "annotation
> branches" for things like code review etc. They'd be a real branch in
> their own right and with their own history, but at the same time they
> could well want to point back to the "code branch" that they annotate by
> considering that another parent in a "non-data merge" (and yes, you'd
> obviously have to use a special merge strategy for things like that, but
> you'd likely integrate it in some "annotation tool chain" rather than
> anything else).
By the way, what is status of git-notes / commit annotations? Did it got
abandoned, on hiatus, or what?
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-03 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-03 1:14 Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful? Jakub Narebski
2008-06-03 2:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-03 3:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-03 5:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-03 5:28 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-06-03 5:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-03 8:31 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-06-03 10:40 ` SZEDER Gábor
2008-06-03 19:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-03 20:39 ` SZEDER Gábor
2008-06-03 22:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-03 23:10 ` SZEDER Gábor
2008-06-04 0:35 ` Jeff King
2008-06-04 1:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-03 14:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-03 23:11 ` Miklos Vajna
2008-06-04 0:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-03 4:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-03 6:39 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-06-03 7:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-03 7:32 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-06-03 7:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-03 19:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-03 20:27 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2008-06-03 20:33 ` Commit annotations (was:: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?) Johannes Schindelin
2008-06-03 23:59 ` Johan Herland
2008-06-03 2:16 ` Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful? Daniel Villeneuve
2008-06-03 10:06 ` Matthieu Moy
2008-06-03 11:27 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-06-03 11:53 ` Matthieu Moy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200806032227.02951.jnareb@gmail.com \
--to=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.