From: "Denys Fedoryshchenko" <denys@visp.net.lb>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: packetloss, on e1000e worse than r8169?
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 23:20:27 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080616201836.M85480@visp.net.lb> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4856C3A7.9070703@cosmosbay.com>
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:48:55 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote
> Denys Fedoryshchenko a e'crit :
> > Hi again
> >
> > I moved from PCI Realtek 8169 to onboard PCI-Express e1000e, and situation
> > become worse. Strange? Yes.
> >
> > Here is info
> > Load and error rate:
> >
> > MegaRouter-KARAM /sys # ifconfig eth1;sleep 10;ifconfig eth1
> > eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:19:D1:71:5F:33
> > inet addr:192.168.20.10 Bcast:0.0.0.0 Mask:255.255.255.0
> > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> > RX packets:91991642 errors:0 dropped:1803444 overruns:0 frame:0
> > TX packets:91914611 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
> > RX bytes:316112765 (301.4 MiB) TX bytes:138303107 (131.8 MiB)
> > Memory:90300000-90320000
> >
> > eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:19:D1:71:5F:33
> > inet addr:192.168.20.10 Bcast:0.0.0.0 Mask:255.255.255.0
> > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> > RX packets:92812514 errors:0 dropped:1815490 overruns:0 frame:0
> > TX packets:92734865 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
> > RX bytes:739941322 (705.6 MiB) TX bytes:560547138 (534.5 MiB)
> > Memory:90300000-90320000
> >
> > System load (there is no NAT, no shapers, just routing, around 600-700
routes):
> > MegaRouter-KARAM /sys # mpstat 1
> > Linux 2.6.26-rc6-git2-build-0029 (MegaRouter-KARAM) 06/16/08
> >
> > 22:36:36 CPU %user %nice %sys %iowait %irq %soft %steal
> > %idle intr/s
> > 22:36:37 all 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.49 0.00
> > 98.51 19764.00
> > 22:36:38 all 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00
> > 99.01 19888.00
> > 22:36:39 all 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00
> > 99.50 19642.00
> > 22:36:40 all 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.01 9.05 0.00
> > 89.95 19543.00
> >
> > (system almost idle)
> >
> > MegaRouter-KARAM /sys # ethtool -S eth1
> > NIC statistics:
> > rx_packets: 109977509
> > tx_packets: 109887692
> > rx_bytes: 57656749138
> > tx_bytes: 57536071746
> > rx_broadcast: 6497
> > tx_broadcast: 92
> > rx_multicast: 48995
> > tx_multicast: 1960
> > rx_errors: 0
> > tx_errors: 0
> > tx_dropped: 0
> > multicast: 48995
> > collisions: 0
> > rx_length_errors: 0
> > rx_over_errors: 0
> > rx_crc_errors: 0
> > rx_frame_errors: 0
> > rx_no_buffer_count: 1796
> > rx_missed_errors: 2182679
> > tx_aborted_errors: 0
> > tx_carrier_errors: 0
> > tx_fifo_errors: 0
> > tx_heartbeat_errors: 0
> > tx_window_errors: 0
> > tx_abort_late_coll: 0
> > tx_deferred_ok: 55617
> > tx_single_coll_ok: 0
> > tx_multi_coll_ok: 0
> > tx_timeout_count: 0
> > tx_restart_queue: 1626
> > rx_long_length_errors: 0
> > rx_short_length_errors: 0
> > rx_align_errors: 0
> > tx_tcp_seg_good: 0
> > tx_tcp_seg_failed: 0
> > rx_flow_control_xon: 55461
> > rx_flow_control_xoff: 57329
> > tx_flow_control_xon: 39114
> > tx_flow_control_xoff: 48341
> > rx_long_byte_count: 57656749138
> > rx_csum_offload_good: 104097306
> > rx_csum_offload_errors: 2209
> > rx_header_split: 0
> > alloc_rx_buff_failed: 0
> > tx_smbus: 22
> > rx_smbus: 2201
> > dropped_smbus: 0
> > rx_dma_failed: 0
> > tx_dma_failed: 0
> > MegaRouter-KARAM /sys # ethtool -S eth1
> > NIC statistics:
> > rx_packets: 110154571
> > tx_packets: 110064459
> > rx_bytes: 57753358981
> > tx_bytes: 57632419451
> > rx_broadcast: 6501
> > tx_broadcast: 92
> > rx_multicast: 49155
> > tx_multicast: 1960
> > rx_errors: 0
> > tx_errors: 0
> > tx_dropped: 0
> > multicast: 49155
> > collisions: 0
> > rx_length_errors: 0
> > rx_over_errors: 0
> > rx_crc_errors: 0
> > rx_frame_errors: 0
> > rx_no_buffer_count: 1796
> > rx_missed_errors: 2187703
> > tx_aborted_errors: 0
> > tx_carrier_errors: 0
> > tx_fifo_errors: 0
> > tx_heartbeat_errors: 0
> > tx_window_errors: 0
> > tx_abort_late_coll: 0
> > tx_deferred_ok: 55772
> > tx_single_coll_ok: 0
> > tx_multi_coll_ok: 0
> > tx_timeout_count: 0
> > tx_restart_queue: 1628
> > rx_long_length_errors: 0
> > rx_short_length_errors: 0
> > rx_align_errors: 0
> > tx_tcp_seg_good: 0
> > tx_tcp_seg_failed: 0
> > rx_flow_control_xon: 55615
> > rx_flow_control_xoff: 57488
> > tx_flow_control_xon: 39209
> > tx_flow_control_xoff: 48448
> > rx_long_byte_count: 57753358981
> > rx_csum_offload_good: 104264656
> > rx_csum_offload_errors: 2210
> > rx_header_split: 0
> > alloc_rx_buff_failed: 0
> > tx_smbus: 23
> > rx_smbus: 2207
> > dropped_smbus: 0
> > rx_dma_failed: 0
> > tx_dma_failed: 0
> >
> >
> >
>
> What RX & TX rings look like on e1000e ?
>
> ethtool -g eth1
>
> Also, please post "cat /proc/interrupts"
>
MegaRouter-KARAM ~ # ethtool -g eth1
Ring parameters for eth1:
Pre-set maximums:
RX: 4096
RX Mini: 0
RX Jumbo: 0
TX: 4096
Current hardware settings:
RX: 256
RX Mini: 0
RX Jumbo: 0
TX: 256
After i tried to set ethtool -G eth1 4096 system becomes extremely slow, what
is very strange for me. I had to soft-reboot it (over kexec).
MegaRouter-KARAM ~ # cat /proc/interrupts;sleep 10;cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0 CPU1
0: 86148 0 IO-APIC-edge timer
1: 2 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042
9: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi acpi
12: 5 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042
16: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb3
18: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi ehci_hcd:usb1, uhci_hcd:usb7
19: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb6
21: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb4
23: 968 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi ehci_hcd:usb2, uhci_hcd:usb5
217: 3 1460438 PCI-MSI-edge eth1
NMI: 86087 85892 Non-maskable interrupts
LOC: 0 85892 Local timer interrupts
RES: 44 81 Rescheduling interrupts
CAL: 88 56 function call interrupts
TLB: 91 78 TLB shootdowns
TRM: 0 0 Thermal event interrupts
SPU: 0 0 Spurious interrupts
ERR: 0
MIS: 0
CPU0 CPU1
0: 96150 0 IO-APIC-edge timer
1: 2 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042
9: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi acpi
12: 5 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042
16: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb3
18: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi ehci_hcd:usb1, uhci_hcd:usb7
19: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb6
21: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb4
23: 968 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi ehci_hcd:usb2, uhci_hcd:usb5
217: 3 1646537 PCI-MSI-edge eth1
NMI: 96088 95893 Non-maskable interrupts
LOC: 0 95893 Local timer interrupts
RES: 44 81 Rescheduling interrupts
CAL: 89 56 function call interrupts
TLB: 91 78 TLB shootdowns
TRM: 0 0 Thermal event interrupts
SPU: 0 0 Spurious interrupts
ERR: 0
MIS: 0
About NMI interrupts - nmi_watchdog=1, if i disable it, it doesn't change
anything.
--
Denys Fedoryshchenko
Technical Manager
Virtual ISP S.A.L.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-16 20:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-16 19:37 packetloss, on e1000e worse than r8169? Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-16 19:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-06-16 20:20 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko [this message]
2008-06-16 20:23 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-16 20:36 ` Kok, Auke
2008-06-16 20:52 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
[not found] ` <20080616204411.M52834@visp.net.lb>
2008-06-16 20:49 ` Kok, Auke
2008-06-16 20:59 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-16 21:13 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-16 21:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-06-16 21:41 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-16 21:41 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
[not found] ` <20080616213419.M212@visp.net.lb>
2008-06-16 21:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-06-16 21:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-06-16 22:08 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-17 2:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-06-17 2:47 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-16 22:08 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-16 23:24 ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2008-06-17 1:53 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-17 6:46 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-17 17:22 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-18 0:58 ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2008-06-17 21:04 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-18 16:50 ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2008-06-18 17:03 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-16 21:17 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-16 21:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-06-16 20:15 ` Auke Kok
2008-06-16 20:29 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-06-16 20:26 ` Francois Romieu
2008-06-16 20:37 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2008-06-16 20:42 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080616201836.M85480@visp.net.lb \
--to=denys@visp.net.lb \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.