From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks-PjAqaU27lzQ@public.gmane.org
Cc: Michael Kerrisk
<mtk.manpages-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>,
Ivana Varekova <varekova-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: PR_SET_SECCOMP and PR_GET_SECCOMP doc (and bug?)
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:34:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080617173411.GC28087@duo.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18697.1213719134-+bZmOdGhbsPr6rcHtW+onFJE71vCis6O@public.gmane.org>
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 12:12:14PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks-PjAqaU27lzQ@public.gmane.org wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:32:29 +0200, Michael Kerrisk said:
> > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Andrea Arcangeli <andrea-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 02:15:13PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
>
> > >> PR_GET_SECCOMP (since Linux 2.6.23)
> > >> Return the secure computing mode of the calling thread.
> > >> Not very useful: if the caller is not in secure computing
> > >> mode, this operation returns 0; if the caller is in secure
> > >> computing mode, then the prctl() call will cause a SIGKILL
> > >> signal to be sent to the process. This operation is only
> > >> available if the kernel is configured with CONFIG_SECCOMP
> > >> enabled.
>
> Would it make sense to change the text to read "Not very useful for the
> current implementation of mode=1" and/or add that it may be useful for
Yes, makes sense to me ;).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@qumranet.com>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@googlemail.com>,
Ivana Varekova <varekova@redhat.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PR_SET_SECCOMP and PR_GET_SECCOMP doc (and bug?)
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:34:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080617173411.GC28087@duo.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18697.1213719134@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 12:12:14PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:32:29 +0200, Michael Kerrisk said:
> > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@qumranet.com> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 02:15:13PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
>
> > >> PR_GET_SECCOMP (since Linux 2.6.23)
> > >> Return the secure computing mode of the calling thread.
> > >> Not very useful: if the caller is not in secure computing
> > >> mode, this operation returns 0; if the caller is in secure
> > >> computing mode, then the prctl() call will cause a SIGKILL
> > >> signal to be sent to the process. This operation is only
> > >> available if the kernel is configured with CONFIG_SECCOMP
> > >> enabled.
>
> Would it make sense to change the text to read "Not very useful for the
> current implementation of mode=1" and/or add that it may be useful for
Yes, makes sense to me ;).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-17 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-16 12:15 PR_SET_SECCOMP and PR_GET_SECCOMP doc (and bug?) Michael Kerrisk
2008-06-16 12:15 ` Michael Kerrisk
2008-06-16 16:25 ` Andrea Arcangeli
[not found] ` <20080616162543.GA9552-cCc6IEhtdJnQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-06-17 13:32 ` Michael Kerrisk
2008-06-17 13:32 ` Michael Kerrisk
[not found] ` <cfd18e0f0806170632p27a5ccd2obadaf0dfd4ce64aa-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2008-06-17 16:12 ` Valdis.Kletnieks-PjAqaU27lzQ
2008-06-17 16:12 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
[not found] ` <18697.1213719134-+bZmOdGhbsPr6rcHtW+onFJE71vCis6O@public.gmane.org>
2008-06-17 17:34 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2008-06-17 17:34 ` Andrea Arcangeli
[not found] ` <20080617173411.GC28087-cCc6IEhtdJnQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-06-17 17:59 ` Michael Kerrisk
2008-06-17 17:59 ` Michael Kerrisk
2008-06-17 17:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-06-17 17:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080617173411.GC28087@duo.random \
--to=andrea-atkuwr5tajbwk0htik3j/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks-PjAqaU27lzQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=varekova-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.