From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix mount option parsing in remount
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:11:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080627131136.GD23431@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080603080019.GB19608@lst.de>
ping^2
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 10:00:19AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> ping? silently ignoring wrong options causes a lot of confusion for
> users, and the patch sould simple enough. Anyone take 10 minutes to
> review it and check it in?
>
> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 05:35:39PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Remount currently happily accept any option thrown at it, although the
> > only filesystem specific option it actually handles is barrier/nobarrier.
> > And it actually doesn't handle these correctly either because it only
> > uses the value it parsed when we're doing a ro->rw transition. In
> > addition to that there's also a bad bug in xfs_parseargs which doesn't
> > touch the actual option in the mount point except for a single one,
> > XFS_MOUNT_SMALL_INUMS and thus forced any filesystem that's every
> > remounted in some way to not support 64bit inodes with no way to recover
> > unless unmounted.
> >
> > This patch changes xfs_fs_remount to use it's own linux/parser.h based
> > options parse instead of xfs_parseargs and reject all options except
> > for barrier/nobarrier and to the right thing in general. Eventually
> > I'd like to have a single big option table used for mount aswell but
> > that can wait for a while.
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6-xfs.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c 2008-05-18 15:22:23.000000000 +0200
> > +++ linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c 2008-05-18 15:59:32.000000000 +0200
> > @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@
> > #include <linux/writeback.h>
> > #include <linux/kthread.h>
> > #include <linux/freezer.h>
> > +#include <linux/parser.h>
> >
> > static struct quotactl_ops xfs_quotactl_operations;
> > static struct super_operations xfs_super_operations;
> > @@ -1255,6 +1256,19 @@ xfs_fs_statfs(
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Eventually we should extend this table and use it for mount, too.
> > + */
> > +enum {
> > + Opt_barrier, Opt_nobarrier, Opt_err
> > +};
> > +
> > +static match_table_t tokens = {
> > + {Opt_barrier, "barrier"},
> > + {Opt_nobarrier, "nobarrier"},
> > + {Opt_err, NULL}
> > +};
> > +
> > STATIC int
> > xfs_fs_remount(
> > struct super_block *sb,
> > @@ -1262,36 +1276,54 @@ xfs_fs_remount(
> > char *options)
> > {
> > struct xfs_mount *mp = XFS_M(sb);
> > - struct xfs_mount_args *args;
> > - int error;
> > + substring_t args[MAX_OPT_ARGS];
> > + char *p;
> >
> > - args = xfs_args_allocate(sb, 0);
> > - if (!args)
> > - return -ENOMEM;
> > + while ((p = strsep(&options, ",")) != NULL) {
> > + int token;
> >
> > - error = xfs_parseargs(mp, options, args, 1);
> > - if (error)
> > - goto out_free_args;
> > + if (!*p)
> > + continue;
> >
> > - if (!(*flags & MS_RDONLY)) { /* rw/ro -> rw */
> > - if (mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_RDONLY)
> > - mp->m_flags &= ~XFS_MOUNT_RDONLY;
> > - if (args->flags & XFSMNT_BARRIER) {
> > + token = match_token(p, tokens, args);
> > + switch (token) {
> > + case Opt_barrier:
> > mp->m_flags |= XFS_MOUNT_BARRIER;
> > - xfs_mountfs_check_barriers(mp);
> > - } else {
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Test if barriers are actually working if we can,
> > + * else delay this check until the filesystem is
> > + * marked writeable.
> > + */
> > + if (!(mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_RDONLY))
> > + xfs_mountfs_check_barriers(mp);
> > + break;
> > + case Opt_nobarrier:
> > mp->m_flags &= ~XFS_MOUNT_BARRIER;
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + printk(KERN_INFO
> > + "XFS: mount option \"%s\" not support for remount\n", p);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > - } else if (!(mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_RDONLY)) { /* rw -> ro */
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* rw/ro -> rw */
> > + if ((mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_RDONLY) && !(*flags & MS_RDONLY)) {
> > + mp->m_flags &= ~XFS_MOUNT_RDONLY;
> > + if (mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_BARRIER)
> > + xfs_mountfs_check_barriers(mp);
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* rw -> ro */
> > + if (!(mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_RDONLY) && (*flags & MS_RDONLY)) {
> > xfs_filestream_flush(mp);
> > xfs_sync(mp, SYNC_DATA_QUIESCE);
> > xfs_attr_quiesce(mp);
> > mp->m_flags |= XFS_MOUNT_RDONLY;
> > }
> >
> > - out_free_args:
> > - kfree(args);
> > - return -error;
> > + return 0;
> > }
> >
> > /*
> ---end quoted text---
---end quoted text---
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-27 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-18 15:35 [PATCH] fix mount option parsing in remount Christoph Hellwig
2008-06-03 8:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-06-27 13:11 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2008-06-27 14:49 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-06-03 12:51 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-06-03 13:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-06-30 6:21 ` Timothy Shimmin
2008-06-30 16:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080627131136.GD23431@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.