From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>
Cc: gregkh@suse.de, x86@kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yhlu.kernel@gmail.com,
vgoyal@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add /sys/firmware/memmap
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:36:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080711173609.8310504d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1214565175-21512-2-git-send-email-bwalle@suse.de>
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:12:54 +0200 Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de> wrote:
> This patch adds /sys/firmware/memmap interface that represents the BIOS
> (or Firmware) provided memory map. The tree looks like:
>
> /sys/firmware/memmap/0/start (hex number)
> end (hex number)
> type (string)
> ... /1/start
> end
> type
>
> With the following shell snippet one can print the memory map in the same form
> the kernel prints itself when booting on x86 (the E820 map).
>
> --------- 8< --------------------------
> #!/bin/sh
> cd /sys/firmware/memmap
> for dir in * ; do
> start=$(cat $dir/start)
> end=$(cat $dir/end)
> type=$(cat $dir/type)
> printf "%016x-%016x (%s)\n" $start $[ $end +1] "$type"
> done
> --------- >8 --------------------------
>
> That patch only provides the needed interface:
>
> 1. The sysfs interface.
> 2. The structure and enumeration definition.
> 3. The function firmware_map_add() and firmware_map_add_early()
> that should be called from architecture code (E820/EFI, for
> example) to add the contents to the interface.
>
> If the kernel is compiled without CONFIG_FIRMWARE_MEMMAP, the interface does
> nothing without cluttering the architecture-specific code with #ifdef's.
>
> The purpose of the new interface is kexec: While /proc/iomem represents
> the *used* memory map (e.g. modified via kernel parameters like 'memmap'
> and 'mem'), the /sys/firmware/memmap tree represents the unmodified memory
> map provided via the firmware. So kexec can:
>
> - use the original memory map for rebooting,
> - use the /proc/iomem for setting up the ELF core headers for kdump
> case that should only represent the memory of the system.
>
> The patch has been tested on i386 and x86_64.
>
> ...
>
> +/*
> + * Firmware memory map entries
> + */
> +static LIST_HEAD(map_entries);
Alarm bells. Please add a comment explaining why no locking is needed
for this.
> +/**
> + * Common implementation of firmware_map_add() and firmware_map_add_early()
> + * which expects a pre-allocated struct firmware_map_entry.
> + *
> + * @start: Start of the memory range.
> + * @end: End of the memory range (inclusive).
> + * @type: Type of the memory range.
> + * @entry: Pre-allocated (either kmalloc() or bootmem allocator), uninitialised
> + * entry.
> + */
Busted kerneldoc. It should start with
/**
* firmware_map_add_entry - <stuff>
> +static int firmware_map_add_entry(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
> + const char *type,
> + struct firmware_map_entry *entry)
> +{
> + BUG_ON(start > end);
> +
> + entry->start = start;
> + entry->end = end;
> + entry->type = type;
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&entry->list);
> + kobject_init(&entry->kobj, &memmap_ktype);
> +
> + list_add_tail(&entry->list, &map_entries);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * See <linux/firmware-map.h> for documentation.
> + */
> +int firmware_map_add(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
> + const char *type)
> +{
> + struct firmware_map_entry *entry;
> +
> + entry = kmalloc(sizeof(struct firmware_map_entry), GFP_ATOMIC);
> + WARN_ON(!entry);
Actually, kmalloc() would have warned already.
> + if (!entry)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + return firmware_map_add_entry(start, end, type, entry);
> +}
> +
>
> ...
>
> +static ssize_t start_show(struct firmware_map_entry *entry, char *buf)
> +{
> + return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "0x%llx\n", entry->start);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t end_show(struct firmware_map_entry *entry, char *buf)
> +{
> + return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "0x%llx\n", entry->end);
> +}
Printing a resource_size_t needs a cast to `unsigned long long' to
avoid printk warnings.
> +static ssize_t type_show(struct firmware_map_entry *entry, char *buf)
> +{
> + return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%s\n", entry->type);
> +}
> +
> +#define to_memmap_attr(_attr) container_of(_attr, struct memmap_attribute, attr)
> +#define to_memmap_entry(obj) container_of(obj, struct firmware_map_entry, kobj)
> +
> +static ssize_t memmap_attr_show(struct kobject *kobj,
> + struct attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> + struct firmware_map_entry *entry = to_memmap_entry(kobj);
> + struct memmap_attribute *memmap_attr = to_memmap_attr(attr);
> +
> + return memmap_attr->show(entry, buf);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Initialises stuff and adds the entries in the map_entries list to
> + * sysfs. Important is that firmware_map_add() and firmware_map_add_early()
> + * must be called before late_initcall.
Please update the comment to provide the reason why this is important.
> + */
> +static int __init memmap_init(void)
> +{
> + int i = 0;
> + struct firmware_map_entry *entry;
> + struct kset *memmap_kset;
> +
> + memmap_kset = kset_create_and_add("memmap", NULL, firmware_kobj);
> + WARN_ON(!memmap_kset);
> + if (!memmap_kset)
> + return -ENOMEM;
Actually, you can do
if (WARN_ON(!memmap_kset))
return -ENOMEM;
(multiple instances)
> + list_for_each_entry(entry, &map_entries, list) {
> + entry->kobj.kset = memmap_kset;
> + kobject_add(&entry->kobj, NULL, "%d", i++);
kobject_add() can fail.
I'd suggest that you enable CONFIG_ENABLE_MUST_CHECK in your usualconfig.
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +late_initcall(memmap_init);
> +
>
> ...
>
> +/**
> + * Adds a firmware mapping entry. This function uses kmalloc() for memory
> + * allocation. Use firmware_map_add_early() if you want to use the bootmem
> + * allocator.
> + *
> + * That function must be called before late_initcall.
> + *
> + * @start: Start of the memory range.
> + * @end: End of the memory range (inclusive).
> + * @type: Type of the memory range.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success, or -ENOMEM if no memory could be allocated.
> + */
> +int firmware_map_add(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
> + const char *type);
More busted kernedoc (multiple instances)
Please document C functions at the definition site, not in the header file.
a) because otherwise the documentation gets splattered across
different files (eg - static functions?)
b) principle of least surprise: that's where people expect to find it.
> +/**
> + * Adds a firmware mapping entry. This function uses the bootmem allocator
> + * for memory allocation. Use firmware_map_add() if you want to use kmalloc().
> + *
> + * That function must be called before late_initcall.
> + *
> + * @start: Start of the memory range.
> + * @end: End of the memory range (inclusive).
> + * @type: Type of the memory range.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success, or -ENOMEM if no memory could be allocated.
> + */
> +int firmware_map_add_early(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
> + const char *type);
> +
> +#else /* CONFIG_FIRMWARE_MEMMAP */
> +
> +static inline int firmware_map_add(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
> + const char *type)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int firmware_map_add_early(resource_size_t start,
> + resource_size_t end, const char *type)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_FIRMWARE_MEMMAP */
> +
> +#endif /* _LINUX_FIRMWARE_MAP_H */
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, gregkh@suse.de, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
yhlu.kernel@gmail.com, vgoyal@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add /sys/firmware/memmap
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:36:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080711173609.8310504d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1214565175-21512-2-git-send-email-bwalle@suse.de>
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:12:54 +0200 Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de> wrote:
> This patch adds /sys/firmware/memmap interface that represents the BIOS
> (or Firmware) provided memory map. The tree looks like:
>
> /sys/firmware/memmap/0/start (hex number)
> end (hex number)
> type (string)
> ... /1/start
> end
> type
>
> With the following shell snippet one can print the memory map in the same form
> the kernel prints itself when booting on x86 (the E820 map).
>
> --------- 8< --------------------------
> #!/bin/sh
> cd /sys/firmware/memmap
> for dir in * ; do
> start=$(cat $dir/start)
> end=$(cat $dir/end)
> type=$(cat $dir/type)
> printf "%016x-%016x (%s)\n" $start $[ $end +1] "$type"
> done
> --------- >8 --------------------------
>
> That patch only provides the needed interface:
>
> 1. The sysfs interface.
> 2. The structure and enumeration definition.
> 3. The function firmware_map_add() and firmware_map_add_early()
> that should be called from architecture code (E820/EFI, for
> example) to add the contents to the interface.
>
> If the kernel is compiled without CONFIG_FIRMWARE_MEMMAP, the interface does
> nothing without cluttering the architecture-specific code with #ifdef's.
>
> The purpose of the new interface is kexec: While /proc/iomem represents
> the *used* memory map (e.g. modified via kernel parameters like 'memmap'
> and 'mem'), the /sys/firmware/memmap tree represents the unmodified memory
> map provided via the firmware. So kexec can:
>
> - use the original memory map for rebooting,
> - use the /proc/iomem for setting up the ELF core headers for kdump
> case that should only represent the memory of the system.
>
> The patch has been tested on i386 and x86_64.
>
> ...
>
> +/*
> + * Firmware memory map entries
> + */
> +static LIST_HEAD(map_entries);
Alarm bells. Please add a comment explaining why no locking is needed
for this.
> +/**
> + * Common implementation of firmware_map_add() and firmware_map_add_early()
> + * which expects a pre-allocated struct firmware_map_entry.
> + *
> + * @start: Start of the memory range.
> + * @end: End of the memory range (inclusive).
> + * @type: Type of the memory range.
> + * @entry: Pre-allocated (either kmalloc() or bootmem allocator), uninitialised
> + * entry.
> + */
Busted kerneldoc. It should start with
/**
* firmware_map_add_entry - <stuff>
> +static int firmware_map_add_entry(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
> + const char *type,
> + struct firmware_map_entry *entry)
> +{
> + BUG_ON(start > end);
> +
> + entry->start = start;
> + entry->end = end;
> + entry->type = type;
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&entry->list);
> + kobject_init(&entry->kobj, &memmap_ktype);
> +
> + list_add_tail(&entry->list, &map_entries);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * See <linux/firmware-map.h> for documentation.
> + */
> +int firmware_map_add(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
> + const char *type)
> +{
> + struct firmware_map_entry *entry;
> +
> + entry = kmalloc(sizeof(struct firmware_map_entry), GFP_ATOMIC);
> + WARN_ON(!entry);
Actually, kmalloc() would have warned already.
> + if (!entry)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + return firmware_map_add_entry(start, end, type, entry);
> +}
> +
>
> ...
>
> +static ssize_t start_show(struct firmware_map_entry *entry, char *buf)
> +{
> + return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "0x%llx\n", entry->start);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t end_show(struct firmware_map_entry *entry, char *buf)
> +{
> + return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "0x%llx\n", entry->end);
> +}
Printing a resource_size_t needs a cast to `unsigned long long' to
avoid printk warnings.
> +static ssize_t type_show(struct firmware_map_entry *entry, char *buf)
> +{
> + return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%s\n", entry->type);
> +}
> +
> +#define to_memmap_attr(_attr) container_of(_attr, struct memmap_attribute, attr)
> +#define to_memmap_entry(obj) container_of(obj, struct firmware_map_entry, kobj)
> +
> +static ssize_t memmap_attr_show(struct kobject *kobj,
> + struct attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> + struct firmware_map_entry *entry = to_memmap_entry(kobj);
> + struct memmap_attribute *memmap_attr = to_memmap_attr(attr);
> +
> + return memmap_attr->show(entry, buf);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Initialises stuff and adds the entries in the map_entries list to
> + * sysfs. Important is that firmware_map_add() and firmware_map_add_early()
> + * must be called before late_initcall.
Please update the comment to provide the reason why this is important.
> + */
> +static int __init memmap_init(void)
> +{
> + int i = 0;
> + struct firmware_map_entry *entry;
> + struct kset *memmap_kset;
> +
> + memmap_kset = kset_create_and_add("memmap", NULL, firmware_kobj);
> + WARN_ON(!memmap_kset);
> + if (!memmap_kset)
> + return -ENOMEM;
Actually, you can do
if (WARN_ON(!memmap_kset))
return -ENOMEM;
(multiple instances)
> + list_for_each_entry(entry, &map_entries, list) {
> + entry->kobj.kset = memmap_kset;
> + kobject_add(&entry->kobj, NULL, "%d", i++);
kobject_add() can fail.
I'd suggest that you enable CONFIG_ENABLE_MUST_CHECK in your usualconfig.
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +late_initcall(memmap_init);
> +
>
> ...
>
> +/**
> + * Adds a firmware mapping entry. This function uses kmalloc() for memory
> + * allocation. Use firmware_map_add_early() if you want to use the bootmem
> + * allocator.
> + *
> + * That function must be called before late_initcall.
> + *
> + * @start: Start of the memory range.
> + * @end: End of the memory range (inclusive).
> + * @type: Type of the memory range.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success, or -ENOMEM if no memory could be allocated.
> + */
> +int firmware_map_add(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
> + const char *type);
More busted kernedoc (multiple instances)
Please document C functions at the definition site, not in the header file.
a) because otherwise the documentation gets splattered across
different files (eg - static functions?)
b) principle of least surprise: that's where people expect to find it.
> +/**
> + * Adds a firmware mapping entry. This function uses the bootmem allocator
> + * for memory allocation. Use firmware_map_add() if you want to use kmalloc().
> + *
> + * That function must be called before late_initcall.
> + *
> + * @start: Start of the memory range.
> + * @end: End of the memory range (inclusive).
> + * @type: Type of the memory range.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success, or -ENOMEM if no memory could be allocated.
> + */
> +int firmware_map_add_early(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
> + const char *type);
> +
> +#else /* CONFIG_FIRMWARE_MEMMAP */
> +
> +static inline int firmware_map_add(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
> + const char *type)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int firmware_map_add_early(resource_size_t start,
> + resource_size_t end, const char *type)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_FIRMWARE_MEMMAP */
> +
> +#endif /* _LINUX_FIRMWARE_MAP_H */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-12 0:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-27 11:12 x86: Add /sys/firmware/memmap Bernhard Walle
2008-06-27 11:12 ` Bernhard Walle
2008-06-27 11:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Bernhard Walle
2008-06-27 11:12 ` Bernhard Walle
2008-06-27 18:51 ` Dave Hansen
2008-06-27 18:51 ` Dave Hansen
2008-06-27 20:56 ` Greg KH
2008-06-27 20:56 ` Greg KH
2008-07-01 20:30 ` Bernhard Walle
2008-07-01 20:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-12 0:36 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-07-12 0:36 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-12 22:15 ` firmware/memmap fixes Bernhard Walle
2008-07-12 22:15 ` Bernhard Walle
2008-07-12 22:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] firmware/memmap: Cleanup Bernhard Walle
2008-07-12 22:15 ` Bernhard Walle
2008-07-12 22:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] firmware/memmap: Move kobject initialisation before kobject_add() Bernhard Walle
2008-07-12 22:15 ` Bernhard Walle
2008-06-27 11:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] Use FIRMWARE_MEMMAP on x86/E820 Bernhard Walle
2008-06-27 11:12 ` Bernhard Walle
2008-06-27 13:01 ` x86: Add /sys/firmware/memmap Vivek Goyal
2008-06-27 13:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-06-27 18:18 ` Greg KH
2008-06-27 18:18 ` Greg KH
2008-06-27 18:34 ` Bernhard Walle
2008-06-27 18:34 ` Bernhard Walle
2008-07-03 14:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-03 14:15 ` Ingo Molnar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-06-26 20:19 Bernhard Walle
2008-06-26 20:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Bernhard Walle
2008-06-26 20:19 ` Bernhard Walle
2008-06-26 20:45 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-06-26 20:45 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-06-26 22:24 ` Greg KH
2008-06-26 22:24 ` Greg KH
2008-06-27 11:08 ` Bernhard Walle
2008-06-27 11:08 ` Bernhard Walle
2008-06-26 8:14 x86: " Bernhard Walle
2008-06-26 8:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Bernhard Walle
2008-06-26 8:14 ` Bernhard Walle
2008-06-25 19:57 x86: " Bernhard Walle
2008-06-25 19:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Bernhard Walle
2008-06-25 19:57 ` Bernhard Walle
2008-06-25 22:43 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-06-25 22:43 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-06-26 8:13 ` Mikael Pettersson
2008-06-26 8:13 ` Mikael Pettersson
2008-06-26 8:45 ` Bernhard Walle
2008-06-26 8:45 ` Bernhard Walle
2008-06-26 9:11 ` Mikael Pettersson
2008-06-26 9:11 ` Mikael Pettersson
2008-06-26 18:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-06-26 18:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-06-26 18:18 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-06-26 18:18 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-06-26 19:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-06-26 19:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-06-26 18:23 ` Bernhard Walle
2008-06-26 18:23 ` Bernhard Walle
2008-06-26 12:42 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-06-26 12:42 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-06-26 8:15 ` Bernhard Walle
2008-06-26 8:15 ` Bernhard Walle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080711173609.8310504d.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bwalle@suse.de \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.