From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, vinay@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
krkumar2@in.ibm.com, mchan@broadcom.com, Matheos.Worku@Sun.COM,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/39]: netdev: Move next_sched into struct netdev_queue.
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:49:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080714114913.GA4504@ff.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080703.000333.199735542.davem@davemloft.net>
On 03-07-2008 09:03, David Miller wrote:
> We schedule queues, not the device, for output queue
> processing in BH.
>
...
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index 8e38948..c5e3532 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -1323,13 +1323,14 @@ static void dev_queue_xmit_nit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> void __netif_schedule(struct net_device *dev)
> {
> if (!test_and_set_bit(__LINK_STATE_SCHED, &dev->state)) {
Isn't this bit supposed to be set/tested per queue as well, or do I
miss something?
Jarek P.
> + struct netdev_queue *txq = &dev->tx_queue;
> unsigned long flags;
> struct softnet_data *sd;
>
> local_irq_save(flags);
> sd = &__get_cpu_var(softnet_data);
> - dev->next_sched = sd->output_queue;
> - sd->output_queue = dev;
> + txq->next_sched = sd->output_queue;
> + sd->output_queue = txq;
> raise_softirq_irqoff(NET_TX_SOFTIRQ);
> local_irq_restore(flags);
> }
> @@ -1912,7 +1913,7 @@ static void net_tx_action(struct softirq_action *h)
> }
>
> if (sd->output_queue) {
> - struct net_device *head;
> + struct netdev_queue *head;
>
> local_irq_disable();
> head = sd->output_queue;
> @@ -1920,12 +1921,10 @@ static void net_tx_action(struct softirq_action *h)
> local_irq_enable();
>
> while (head) {
> - struct net_device *dev = head;
> - struct netdev_queue *txq;
> + struct netdev_queue *txq = head;
> + struct net_device *dev = txq->dev;
> head = head->next_sched;
>
> - txq = &dev->tx_queue;
> -
> smp_mb__before_clear_bit();
> clear_bit(__LINK_STATE_SCHED, &dev->state);
>
> @@ -4346,7 +4345,7 @@ static int dev_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
> void *ocpu)
> {
> struct sk_buff **list_skb;
> - struct net_device **list_net;
> + struct netdev_queue **list_net;
> struct sk_buff *skb;
> unsigned int cpu, oldcpu = (unsigned long)ocpu;
> struct softnet_data *sd, *oldsd;
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
Cc: netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
vinay-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org,
krkumar2-xthvdsQ13ZrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
mchan-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
Matheos.Worku-UdXhSnd/wVw@public.gmane.org,
linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/39]: netdev: Move next_sched into struct netdev_queue.
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:49:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080714114913.GA4504@ff.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080703.000333.199735542.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
On 03-07-2008 09:03, David Miller wrote:
> We schedule queues, not the device, for output queue
> processing in BH.
>
...
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index 8e38948..c5e3532 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -1323,13 +1323,14 @@ static void dev_queue_xmit_nit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> void __netif_schedule(struct net_device *dev)
> {
> if (!test_and_set_bit(__LINK_STATE_SCHED, &dev->state)) {
Isn't this bit supposed to be set/tested per queue as well, or do I
miss something?
Jarek P.
> + struct netdev_queue *txq = &dev->tx_queue;
> unsigned long flags;
> struct softnet_data *sd;
>
> local_irq_save(flags);
> sd = &__get_cpu_var(softnet_data);
> - dev->next_sched = sd->output_queue;
> - sd->output_queue = dev;
> + txq->next_sched = sd->output_queue;
> + sd->output_queue = txq;
> raise_softirq_irqoff(NET_TX_SOFTIRQ);
> local_irq_restore(flags);
> }
> @@ -1912,7 +1913,7 @@ static void net_tx_action(struct softirq_action *h)
> }
>
> if (sd->output_queue) {
> - struct net_device *head;
> + struct netdev_queue *head;
>
> local_irq_disable();
> head = sd->output_queue;
> @@ -1920,12 +1921,10 @@ static void net_tx_action(struct softirq_action *h)
> local_irq_enable();
>
> while (head) {
> - struct net_device *dev = head;
> - struct netdev_queue *txq;
> + struct netdev_queue *txq = head;
> + struct net_device *dev = txq->dev;
> head = head->next_sched;
>
> - txq = &dev->tx_queue;
> -
> smp_mb__before_clear_bit();
> clear_bit(__LINK_STATE_SCHED, &dev->state);
>
> @@ -4346,7 +4345,7 @@ static int dev_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
> void *ocpu)
> {
> struct sk_buff **list_skb;
> - struct net_device **list_net;
> + struct netdev_queue **list_net;
> struct sk_buff *skb;
> unsigned int cpu, oldcpu = (unsigned long)ocpu;
> struct softnet_data *sd, *oldsd;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-14 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-03 7:03 [PATCH 11/39]: netdev: Move next_sched into struct netdev_queue David Miller
2008-07-14 11:49 ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2008-07-14 11:49 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-07-14 12:00 ` David Miller
2008-07-14 12:27 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-07-14 12:27 ` Jarek Poplawski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080714114913.GA4504@ff.dom.local \
--to=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=Matheos.Worku@Sun.COM \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=krkumar2@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vinay@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.