From: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
To: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
gregkh@suse.de, lethal@linux-sh.org, i2c@lm-sensors.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/05] resource: add resource_type() and IORESOURCE_TYPE_BITS
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 09:33:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080718083317.GN24620@fluff.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aec7e5c30807180124j3623675fwaeedcaf23e4b0b05@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 05:24:59PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org> wrote:
> > You are changing a simple test to a mask and compare, is anyone going
> > to produce resources with an IORESOURCE_MEM and an IORESOURCE_IO
> > together?
>
> Actually, I'd like to replace the one-bit-per-type strategy with a
> N-bit counter. But that is not very compatible with the case you are
> pointing out. I'm not sure if that's a combination we really want to
> support though. Both IRQ and DMA doesn't make much sense to me. =)
I'm not saying it is a bad idea, I just do not know if anyone is
currently relying on this to work...
--
Ben (ben@fluff.org, http://www.fluff.org/)
'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
To: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
gregkh@suse.de, lethal@linux-sh.org, i2c@lm-sensors.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/05] resource: add resource_type() and
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 08:33:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080718083317.GN24620@fluff.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aec7e5c30807180124j3623675fwaeedcaf23e4b0b05@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 05:24:59PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org> wrote:
> > You are changing a simple test to a mask and compare, is anyone going
> > to produce resources with an IORESOURCE_MEM and an IORESOURCE_IO
> > together?
>
> Actually, I'd like to replace the one-bit-per-type strategy with a
> N-bit counter. But that is not very compatible with the case you are
> pointing out. I'm not sure if that's a combination we really want to
> support though. Both IRQ and DMA doesn't make much sense to me. =)
I'm not saying it is a bad idea, I just do not know if anyone is
currently relying on this to work...
--
Ben (ben@fluff.org, http://www.fluff.org/)
'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-18 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-18 7:40 [PATCH 00/05] resource: type, size and IORESOURCE_CLK patches V2 Magnus Damm
2008-07-18 7:40 ` Magnus Damm
2008-07-18 7:40 ` [PATCH 01/05] resource: add resource_size() Magnus Damm
2008-07-18 7:40 ` Magnus Damm
2008-07-18 7:54 ` Ben Dooks
2008-07-18 7:54 ` Ben Dooks
2008-07-18 7:40 ` [PATCH 02/05] resource: add resource_type() and IORESOURCE_TYPE_BITS Magnus Damm
2008-07-18 7:40 ` Magnus Damm
2008-07-18 7:56 ` Ben Dooks
2008-07-18 7:56 ` [PATCH 02/05] resource: add resource_type() and Ben Dooks
2008-07-18 8:24 ` [PATCH 02/05] resource: add resource_type() and IORESOURCE_TYPE_BITS Magnus Damm
2008-07-18 8:24 ` Magnus Damm
2008-07-18 8:33 ` Ben Dooks [this message]
2008-07-18 8:33 ` [PATCH 02/05] resource: add resource_type() and Ben Dooks
2008-07-18 9:05 ` [PATCH 02/05] resource: add resource_type() and IORESOURCE_TYPE_BITS Magnus Damm
2008-07-18 9:05 ` Magnus Damm
2008-07-18 7:40 ` [PATCH 03/05] resource: add new IORESOURCE_CLK type V2 Magnus Damm
2008-07-18 7:40 ` Magnus Damm
2008-07-18 7:53 ` [i2c] " Ben Dooks
2008-07-18 7:53 ` Ben Dooks
2008-07-18 8:53 ` Magnus Damm
2008-07-18 8:53 ` Magnus Damm
2008-07-18 7:40 ` [PATCH 04/05] i2c-sh_mobile: IORESOURCE_CLK support Magnus Damm
2008-07-18 7:40 ` Magnus Damm
2008-07-18 8:04 ` Ben Dooks
2008-07-18 8:04 ` Ben Dooks
2008-07-18 9:18 ` Magnus Damm
2008-07-18 9:18 ` Magnus Damm
2008-08-13 5:54 ` [i2c] " Ben Dooks
2008-08-13 5:54 ` Ben Dooks
2008-08-13 7:51 ` Russell King
2008-08-13 7:51 ` Russell King
2008-07-18 7:40 ` [PATCH 05/05] sh: add IORESOURCE_CLK to SuperH Mobile I2C platform data Magnus Damm
2008-07-18 7:40 ` Magnus Damm
2008-07-18 23:36 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-18 23:36 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-18 23:36 ` [PATCH 05/05] sh: add IORESOURCE_CLK to SuperH Mobile I2C Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080718083317.GN24620@fluff.org.uk \
--to=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=i2c@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.