From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: module-placed markers/tracepoints
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:41:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080729224115.GA5209@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080729211543.GB17097@redhat.com>
* Frank Ch. Eigler (fche@redhat.com) wrote:
> Hi -
>
> Some locals are wondering -- is there code for (or need for new code
> for) incrementing module reference counts while markers and/or
> tracepoints resident in modules have active clients?
>
> - FChE
Hi Frank,
Probe module unloading is supposed to be done automatically assuming the
following module unload behavior :
1 - Module unload code takes the stop machine lock.
2 - It is assumed that the module exit function is called at that time,
while no preempt-disabled section is executed. This function
unregisters the callbacks.
3 - Given that preemption is disabled around tracepoint/marker calls, no
calls are left to a freed module.
Actually, I notice that it might not be the case. I took for granted
what (I can't remember who ? Rusty ?) told me about module unload code.
If we look at sys_delete_module() :
/* Stop the machine so refcounts can't move and disable module. */
ret = try_stop_module(mod, flags, &forced);
if (ret != 0)
goto out;
/* Never wait if forced. */
if (!forced && module_refcount(mod) != 0)
wait_for_zero_refcount(mod);
mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
/* Final destruction now noone is using it. */
if (mod->exit != NULL)
mod->exit();
So we see that mod->exit(), which I believe is responsible for calling
the module exit() functions, is called after the stop_machine, not
during the stop machine.
Therefore, what would be needed here is to add a synchronize_sched()
after mod->exit() in module.c or after each tracepoint/marker unregister
in marker.c/tracepoint.c. However, I'd really prefer to add this to
module.c since adding this for _every_ unregister will slow down
processing or multiple probe unregistration too much.
Rusty, am I understanding that correctly ?
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-29 22:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-17 15:57 [patch 0/4] Port KVM-trace to tracepoints Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-17 15:57 ` [patch 1/4] kvm move VMCS Encodings to system headers Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-17 15:57 ` [patch 2/4] kvm move VMCS read " Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-17 15:57 ` [patch 3/4] KVM move register read-write " Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-17 15:57 ` [patch 4/4] KVM-trace port to tracepoints Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-17 16:49 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-07-17 17:28 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-22 16:04 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-07-22 18:46 ` Avi Kivity
2008-07-23 7:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-23 8:08 ` Avi Kivity
2008-07-23 8:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-23 9:32 ` Avi Kivity
2008-07-23 9:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-23 13:15 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-23 10:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-07-23 10:08 ` Avi Kivity
2008-07-23 10:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-07-23 13:20 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-17 16:52 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-07-17 17:04 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-22 18:42 ` [patch 0/4] Port KVM-trace " Avi Kivity
2008-07-22 19:16 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-22 19:31 ` Avi Kivity
2008-07-22 19:54 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-22 22:12 ` [patch 0/4] Port KVM-trace to tracepoints -> LTTng ? Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-27 10:11 ` Avi Kivity
2008-07-28 0:54 ` [RFC] LTTng merge plan Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-28 0:54 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-29 16:18 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-29 16:18 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-29 17:01 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-29 17:01 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
[not found] ` <20080729211543.GB17097@redhat.com>
2008-07-29 22:41 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2008-07-29 23:01 ` module-placed markers/tracepoints Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-29 23:19 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-30 1:40 ` Rusty Russell
2008-07-30 2:27 ` [PATCH] Module : call synchronize_sched() between module exit() and free Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-30 3:04 ` Rusty Russell
2008-07-30 4:05 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-30 11:40 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-30 14:09 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-31 0:54 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080729224115.GA5209@Krystal \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.