All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl>
Cc: mhoffman@lightlink.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [RESEND x9+ patch 2.6.26-git 1/2] lm75: cleanup
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:46:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080730004615.f0686916.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48901BF7.9050601@hhs.nl>

On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:44:55 +0200 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl> wrote:

> > > Minor cleanup and reorg of the lm75 code.
> >
> > This patch (and the other) have been in Mark's tree for a month or so. 
> > (linux-next <- useful!)
>  >
> > Mark has been pretty, umm, low-key lately.  I've attached the full
> > git-hwmon changelog below and the authors of all those changes are
> > cc'ed.
> >
> > Could people please confirm that what is in linux-next is still the
> > latest and greatest version of their changes?  If so, I shall plan on
> > fishing those changes out of there and getting them into -rc2.
> 
> Andrew,
> 
> I see that atleast this patch:
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2008-July/023629.html
> 
> Is missing which is a minor yet somewhat important bugfix to the abituguru3 
> driver, see:
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2008-July/023630.html
> 
> For my: "Acked-by: Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl>" Line (I'm the 
> maintainer of that driver).
> 
> It would be nice if this fix could make 2.6.27.
> 

OK.  Can you please email me any patches which you think should be in
2.6.27 in the usual manner, with the appropriate mailing list cc's?  Add
your own signed-off-by: if needed.  I'll get it all lined up.

Or Jean can do it if he'd prefer - the main thing is to not let
people's reviewed, tested and merged code fall out of 2.6.27.

> 
> Also Jean has been doing a lot of patches for all i2c hwmon driver to convert 
> them to new style driver binding, and I've reviewed and Acked the entire bunch.
> So all in all it looks like we're dropping patches, does anyone know whats up 
> with Mark, holiday or ... ?

He did mention a while ago that he had little time, but I don't know
whether that is a temporary state.


_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl>
Cc: mhoffman@lightlink.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [RESEND x9+ patch 2.6.26-git 1/2] lm75: cleanup and reorg
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:46:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080730004615.f0686916.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48901BF7.9050601@hhs.nl>

On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:44:55 +0200 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl> wrote:

> > > Minor cleanup and reorg of the lm75 code.
> >
> > This patch (and the other) have been in Mark's tree for a month or so. 
> > (linux-next <- useful!)
>  >
> > Mark has been pretty, umm, low-key lately.  I've attached the full
> > git-hwmon changelog below and the authors of all those changes are
> > cc'ed.
> >
> > Could people please confirm that what is in linux-next is still the
> > latest and greatest version of their changes?  If so, I shall plan on
> > fishing those changes out of there and getting them into -rc2.
> 
> Andrew,
> 
> I see that atleast this patch:
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2008-July/023629.html
> 
> Is missing which is a minor yet somewhat important bugfix to the abituguru3 
> driver, see:
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2008-July/023630.html
> 
> For my: "Acked-by: Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl>" Line (I'm the 
> maintainer of that driver).
> 
> It would be nice if this fix could make 2.6.27.
> 

OK.  Can you please email me any patches which you think should be in
2.6.27 in the usual manner, with the appropriate mailing list cc's?  Add
your own signed-off-by: if needed.  I'll get it all lined up.

Or Jean can do it if he'd prefer - the main thing is to not let
people's reviewed, tested and merged code fall out of 2.6.27.

> 
> Also Jean has been doing a lot of patches for all i2c hwmon driver to convert 
> them to new style driver binding, and I've reviewed and Acked the entire bunch.
> So all in all it looks like we're dropping patches, does anyone know whats up 
> with Mark, holiday or ... ?

He did mention a while ago that he had little time, but I don't know
whether that is a temporary state.


  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-30  7:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-25 20:21 [lm-sensors] [RESEND x9+ patch 2.6.26-git 1/2] lm75: cleanup and David Brownell
2008-07-25 22:23 ` David Brownell
2008-07-25 22:23   ` [RESEND x9+ patch 2.6.26-git 1/2] lm75: cleanup and reorg David Brownell
2008-07-30  6:32   ` [lm-sensors] [RESEND x9+ patch 2.6.26-git 1/2] lm75: cleanup Andrew Morton
2008-07-30  6:32     ` [RESEND x9+ patch 2.6.26-git 1/2] lm75: cleanup and reorg Andrew Morton
2008-07-30  7:17     ` [lm-sensors] [RESEND x9+ patch 2.6.26-git 1/2] lm75: cleanup David Brownell
2008-07-30  7:17       ` [RESEND x9+ patch 2.6.26-git 1/2] lm75: cleanup and reorg David Brownell
2008-07-30  7:44     ` [lm-sensors] [RESEND x9+ patch 2.6.26-git 1/2] lm75: cleanup Hans de Goede
2008-07-30  7:44       ` [lm-sensors] [RESEND x9+ patch 2.6.26-git 1/2] lm75: cleanup and reorg Hans de Goede
2008-07-30  7:46       ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-07-30  7:46         ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-31 10:33         ` [lm-sensors] [RESEND x9+ patch 2.6.26-git 1/2] lm75: cleanup Hans de Goede
2008-07-31 10:33           ` [lm-sensors] [RESEND x9+ patch 2.6.26-git 1/2] lm75: cleanup and reorg Hans de Goede
2008-07-31 16:52           ` [lm-sensors] [RESEND x9+ patch 2.6.26-git 1/2] lm75: cleanup Andrew Morton
2008-07-31 16:52             ` [lm-sensors] [RESEND x9+ patch 2.6.26-git 1/2] lm75: cleanup and reorg Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080730004615.f0686916.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
    --cc=mhoffman@lightlink.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.