From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] binfmt_elf_fdpic: Convert initial stack alignment to arch_align_stack().
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 21:44:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080801214448.GA13448@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <27552.1217599279@redhat.com>
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 03:01:19PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> wrote:
>
> > + * In some cases (e.g. Hyper-Threading), we want to avoid L1
> > + * evictions by the processes running on the same package. One
> > + * thing we can do is to shuffle the initial stack for them, so
> > + * we give the architecture an opportunity to do so here.
> > + */
> > #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> > - sp = bprm->p;
> > + sp = arch_align_stack(bprm->p);
> > #else
> > - sp = mm->start_stack;
> > + sp = arch_align_stack(mm->start_stack);
>
> Ummm... You're calling arch_align_stack() under NOMMU... Is that really a
> good idea?
>
Not particularly, no.
> You can't necessarily move the stack pointer without exiting the allocated
> region or shrinking the amount of stack space the executable asked for. If
> you want to do this sort of thing, you need to tell the memory allocator what
> you're up to - or at the very least allocate some slack.
>
Yes, that's a good point, and one that probably ought to be documented
alongside the initial alignment. I'll send an updated patch.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] binfmt_elf_fdpic: Convert initial stack alignment to arch_align_stack().
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 06:44:48 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080801214448.GA13448@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <27552.1217599279@redhat.com>
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 03:01:19PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> wrote:
>
> > + * In some cases (e.g. Hyper-Threading), we want to avoid L1
> > + * evictions by the processes running on the same package. One
> > + * thing we can do is to shuffle the initial stack for them, so
> > + * we give the architecture an opportunity to do so here.
> > + */
> > #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> > - sp = bprm->p;
> > + sp = arch_align_stack(bprm->p);
> > #else
> > - sp = mm->start_stack;
> > + sp = arch_align_stack(mm->start_stack);
>
> Ummm... You're calling arch_align_stack() under NOMMU... Is that really a
> good idea?
>
Not particularly, no.
> You can't necessarily move the stack pointer without exiting the allocated
> region or shrinking the amount of stack space the executable asked for. If
> you want to do this sort of thing, you need to tell the memory allocator what
> you're up to - or at the very least allocate some slack.
>
Yes, that's a good point, and one that probably ought to be documented
alongside the initial alignment. I'll send an updated patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-01 21:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-28 15:03 [PATCH 0/3] binfmt_elf_fdpic: auxvec updates Paul Mundt
2008-07-28 15:03 ` Paul Mundt
2008-07-28 15:04 ` [PATCH 1/3] binfmt_elf_fdpic: Support auxvec base platform string Paul Mundt
2008-07-28 15:04 ` Paul Mundt
2008-07-28 15:05 ` [PATCH 2/3] binfmt_elf_fdpic: Convert initial stack alignment to arch_align_stack() Paul Mundt
2008-07-28 15:05 ` Paul Mundt
2008-07-28 15:05 ` [PATCH 3/3] binfmt_elf_fdpic: Wire up AT_EXECFD, AT_EXECFN, AT_SECURE Paul Mundt
2008-07-28 15:05 ` Paul Mundt
2008-08-01 14:04 ` David Howells
2008-08-01 14:04 ` David Howells
2008-08-01 14:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] binfmt_elf_fdpic: Convert initial stack alignment to arch_align_stack() David Howells
2008-08-01 14:01 ` David Howells
2008-08-01 21:44 ` Paul Mundt [this message]
2008-08-01 21:44 ` Paul Mundt
2008-08-04 3:24 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-08-04 3:24 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-08-04 4:00 ` Paul Mundt
2008-08-04 4:00 ` Paul Mundt
2008-08-04 10:08 ` David Howells
2008-08-04 10:08 ` David Howells
2008-08-01 13:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] binfmt_elf_fdpic: Support auxvec base platform string David Howells
2008-08-01 13:57 ` David Howells
2008-08-01 21:46 ` Paul Mundt
2008-08-01 21:46 ` Paul Mundt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-08-06 10:34 [PATCH 0/3] binfmt_elf_fdpic: auxvec updates, v2 Paul Mundt
2008-08-06 10:36 ` [PATCH 2/3] binfmt_elf_fdpic: Convert initial stack alignment to arch_align_stack() Paul Mundt
2008-08-06 10:36 ` Paul Mundt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080801214448.GA13448@linux-sh.org \
--to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.