Re: Current SVN is broken on x86_64

[Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>]

On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 08:51:25AM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 11:16 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> 
> > Furthermore, I had a look and some of the x86_64 versions are just stubs that
> > include the i386 one.
> > 
> > Why don't we handle this like Linux?  They ship a single directory and use
> > #ifdefs where appropiate.  That enforces consistency in the dir layout.
> 
> I think we can do it.  i386 and x86_64 could be joined into one "x86"
> architecture with common headers and sources.  Perhaps the users should
> still use i386 and x86_64 in configure, but the code should be mostly
> common.

Ok, but I think the i386->x86 rename would be overkill.  We're already using
i386/ headers on x86_64 (for example, when building util/ stuff in grub-pc). It
doesn't hurt if we continue doing that IMHO.

-- 
Robert Millan

  The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
  how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
  still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."